Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is a bad argument because it makes both sides get upset. And everyone has different experiences and levels of work. Even the last week with my terminal cancer parent dying wasn’t the same as the first week with a newborn waking hourly. I also had a lot more help with my parent and more visitors. With my newborns it was just my dh (and newborns aren’t all easy, I had one very difficult one and an easy one). One parent got his cancer diagnosis and died 3 weeks later. It was a messy, brutal 3 weeks and he died at home. But there was hospice help and morphine. The other parent has had dementia for 8 years. No way should a job accommodate that. Just like with a baby/child, you need care during the day that allows you to go to work.
I think work should allow you 12 weeks (mine was unpaid) maternity leave and then sick leave to deal with parents’ appointments. I work a 9 hour day and have a day off every other week that’s back to back appointments. That allows me to help but also allows me to be a good employee.
I think you are being unreasonable. You could have taken 6-8 weeks maternity leave and then still had FLMA or leave for parents appointments. If you are taking off 12 week and then a day or two every week, you are not being a good employee. Your personal life is interfering with work.
You aren't understanding the reality this poster is saying. We had a dementia situation and it lasted 5 years. The very end lasted 3 weeks and it was horrible. Its very different than what you are saying. You have no concept of this type of care.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The are very similar--it's about time employers recognize it too and accommodate those that take care of elderly.
Neither should be "accommodated."
So people with a terminally ill parent should just not make a living anymore????
Most elderly care is not for terminal people and then you bring in hospice and other supports. This has nothing to do with employment.
Hospice is skeletal and does not provide more than 4-6 hours a week of actual care. They will give you the thing you need like a hospital bed or a bed chair or a soft gel pillow for the wheelchair. The nurse will come once or twice a week. The social worker will come with the nurse about half the time- 30 minute visit. The doctor will come about once a month= 30 minute visit. We also had someone come to bathe my father 3x a week - 30 minutes each visit. You also have to be there when all the people come. You will still have to toilet your parent. You will still have to move your parent from the bed to a chair. YOU will still have to clean and make the bed, give shots, dress any bandages, keep track of medicines and administer them.... You still have to have 24/7 coverage. You can pay a private place or person to do all that but it is on your dime. They will charge Medicare for each visit ($300 for nurse visitor example) and they will charge Medicare rent fees for all the equipment and they will charge Medicare $5K+ a month for administration. They they will send you requests for donations for the next 5 years. It is a total racquet.
Anonymous wrote:I agree but I am assuming that you did elder care alone and you have help from a partner with your kids?
Anonymous wrote:I think this is a bad argument because it makes both sides get upset. And everyone has different experiences and levels of work. Even the last week with my terminal cancer parent dying wasn’t the same as the first week with a newborn waking hourly. I also had a lot more help with my parent and more visitors. With my newborns it was just my dh (and newborns aren’t all easy, I had one very difficult one and an easy one). One parent got his cancer diagnosis and died 3 weeks later. It was a messy, brutal 3 weeks and he died at home. But there was hospice help and morphine. The other parent has had dementia for 8 years. No way should a job accommodate that. Just like with a baby/child, you need care during the day that allows you to go to work.
I think work should allow you 12 weeks (mine was unpaid) maternity leave and then sick leave to deal with parents’ appointments. I work a 9 hour day and have a day off every other week that’s back to back appointments. That allows me to help but also allows me to be a good employee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The are very similar--it's about time employers recognize it too and accommodate those that take care of elderly.
Neither should be "accommodated."
So people with a terminally ill parent should just not make a living anymore????
Most elderly care is not for terminal people and then you bring in hospice and other supports. This has nothing to do with employment.
That's not how reality works for many of us. I'm glad you can do it, but for me, elderly care took a toll on my career and hospice could only do so much. What do you do when it's not within 6 months of death, but the condition is still serious.
I did 24/7 care for about a year then nursing home and was still there frequently and managing everything. It was a ton of work but it doesn't have to do with employment. You do it nights/weekends/hire a caregiver/nursing home. You make it work. We did it for years.
No. I couldn't do 24/7 care like that. I love my parents but my own health, husband and kids are my priority. This idea that we somehow owe it to our parents to destroy the quality of our own lives in order to make their final years comfortable is just...so very wrong. I would never expect my children to forgo their own happiness and independence like that.
As a parent, I owe it to my kids to give them the best start in life that I know how to give them. That is my job. I hope they will visit me but I do not want them to feel obligated to take care of me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree but I am assuming that you did elder care alone and you have help from a partner with your kids?
Nope, I was married with elder care and we were both heavily involved. It's just I did elder care younger than most and my friends just couldn't relate and I was an anomaly (or so it seemed). With kids, most got it, checked in, actually acknowledged things---but it was challenging, but certainly not adversity.
I'm an academic and there's lots of talk about how to schedule meetings to accomodate faculty with kids. Noone talks about elder care
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree but I am assuming that you did elder care alone and you have help from a partner with your kids?
Nope, I was married with elder care and we were both heavily involved. It's just I did elder care younger than most and my friends just couldn't relate and I was an anomaly (or so it seemed). With kids, most got it, checked in, actually acknowledged things---but it was challenging, but certainly not adversity.
Anonymous wrote:I agree but I am assuming that you did elder care alone and you have help from a partner with your kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The are very similar--it's about time employers recognize it too and accommodate those that take care of elderly.
Neither should be "accommodated."
So people with a terminally ill parent should just not make a living anymore????
Most elderly care is not for terminal people and then you bring in hospice and other supports. This has nothing to do with employment.
That's not how reality works for many of us. I'm glad you can do it, but for me, elderly care took a toll on my career and hospice could only do so much. What do you do when it's not within 6 months of death, but the condition is still serious.
I did 24/7 care for about a year then nursing home and was still there frequently and managing everything. It was a ton of work but it doesn't have to do with employment. You do it nights/weekends/hire a caregiver/nursing home. You make it work. We did it for years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The are very similar--it's about time employers recognize it too and accommodate those that take care of elderly.
Neither should be "accommodated."
So people with a terminally ill parent should just not make a living anymore????
Most elderly care is not for terminal people and then you bring in hospice and other supports. This has nothing to do with employment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The are very similar--it's about time employers recognize it too and accommodate those that take care of elderly.
Neither should be "accommodated."
So people with a terminally ill parent should just not make a living anymore????
Most elderly care is not for terminal people and then you bring in hospice and other supports. This has nothing to do with employment.
That's not how reality works for many of us. I'm glad you can do it, but for me, elderly care took a toll on my career and hospice could only do so much. What do you do when it's not within 6 months of death, but the condition is still serious.
I did 24/7 care for about a year then nursing home and was still there frequently and managing everything. It was a ton of work but it doesn't have to do with employment. You do it nights/weekends/hire a caregiver/nursing home. You make it work. We did it for years.
Okkkkkkk boomer
It a boomer. Grow up and deal with it.