Anonymous wrote:Nanny at least during the winter months for an infant, because of flu season.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny. But the cost was never an issue for us. And I wanted our baby to be cared for specifically. Not herded along in a group, forced to eat and nap when the daycare decided it was time.
Herded? You should see the bayonets they use to keep the toddlers in line. It is actually really cute and sweet to see the little kids line up to go to the playground and the like.
Also, they don't try to keep infants on a schedule. They eat and sleep when they want to.
There are pros and cons to both set ups; it is just really funny to see some of the caricatures that people have of daycare, in most cases by people who have never used a daycare, or at least a good one.
Please name some daycares that you think are such a great places for a four month old baby.
Anonymous wrote:I would do a daycare. Unless you happen to get lucky, $16-$20/hr is on the lower side for nanny care. That's not to mention additional costs that creep up unexpectedly.
If you do use a daycare, I would also suggest trying to find a couple of babysitters as backups for the backup grandma. Kids get sick a lot when they are in daycare for the first year or so. Grandma might not be able to cover all that time and/or handle the fussy baby for long periods of time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny. But the cost was never an issue for us. And I wanted our baby to be cared for specifically. Not herded along in a group, forced to eat and nap when the daycare decided it was time.
Herded? You should see the bayonets they use to keep the toddlers in line. It is actually really cute and sweet to see the little kids line up to go to the playground and the like.
Also, they don't try to keep infants on a schedule. They eat and sleep when they want to.
There are pros and cons to both set ups; it is just really funny to see some of the caricatures that people have of daycare, in most cases by people who have never used a daycare, or at least a good one.
Anonymous wrote:Nanny here. Choose a good nanny over daycare. A good nanny will speak, narrate, read, sing and engage your baby. As the baby gets older, a good nanny will find play groups, story times, free concerts and free forest classes to socialize your baby. A good nanny will have art projects and other sensory stimulations available. There is nothing comparable in early childhood education. Daycares cannot compete.
However, a good daycare is better than a bad nanny. A good daycare is better than a nanny who treats the baby like a sack of potatoes - never plays with the baby, never sings or talks to the baby. If you hire a nanny to be a housekeeper and just keep your baby alive, your baby is much better off in daycare.
Anonymous wrote:Nanny. But the cost was never an issue for us. And I wanted our baby to be cared for specifically. Not herded along in a group, forced to eat and nap when the daycare decided it was time.
Anonymous wrote:Would you consider a nanny-share? You could do it at your house for convenience and it cuts the price way down-closer to daycare costs (at least in DC)
Anonymous wrote:Would you consider a nanny-share? You could do it at your house for convenience and it cuts the price way down-closer to daycare costs (at least in DC)