Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a parent who has spent $$$$ on a top flight non DC private. I think the answer is no. One factor you haven’t considered is that parents like me are more likely to be top school alums themselves. Between all those factors, I think it doesn’t much change admissions outcomes. And it certainly isn’t why I pay for private.
Same, but we're in DC.
I don't think our teens will end up at more competitive universities than our neighbors' kids at public HS, controlling for confounding variables.
I am certain they're getting different education experiences right now. Sometimes, it's the journey
Anonymous wrote:I don't think anyone's going to sign up for a randomized controlled study to prove your question one way or another. As a parent who is paying for 14 years of private school tuition (PK-12) twice. DC1 is at an Ivy and we'll find out if DC2 goes to one next month. They are the kind, thoughtful, serious adults, I wish I was at their age. We have had the luxury of letting them free-range and make their own decisions because they had lots of adults who really knew them at their high school and a program of study that guarantees an easy transition to college. As a matter of fairness, I really hope that they don't have an advantage over public schools students.
My sense is that it doesn't make a difference in admissions for the Ivies+, but it might at the SLACs less selective than Williams/Wellesley/Amherst. But, maybe more importantly, their high school reduced the stress of the admissions process. Teacher recs are tailored for the students and their target schools, counselors help students find safeties they'll be happy at, and there are plenty of friends at the colleges on their lists.
Anonymous wrote:What isn't often discussed, but should be is that if you can fully pay for university and don't need any financial aid, you get an edge up in admissions. Most kids at a Big 3 have parents who can fully pay AND are willing to fully pay for private college. All thing being equal if you have two kids with similar stats, the full pay kid is going to be admitted.
It really is affirmative action for rich people. Most people have to fully pay. Our HHI is around $175,000. We can't pay for a Big 3 or private university.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a parent who has spent $$$$ on a top flight non DC private. I think the answer is no. One factor you haven’t considered is that parents like me are more likely to be top school alums themselves. Between all those factors, I think it doesn’t much change admissions outcomes. And it certainly isn’t why I pay for private.
Anonymous wrote:^ you essentially agree with the posters main point though. Top 10% at good public’s are working just as hard and are just as bright as the kids at $45k+ per year Big 3s. I can understand the bitterness that they feel when they realize all that $ paid didn’t confer an admission advantage.
Anonymous wrote:^ you essentially agree with the posters main point though. Top 10% at good public’s are working just as hard and are just as bright as the kids at $45k+ per year Big 3s. I can understand the bitterness that they feel when they realize all that $ paid didn’t confer an admission advantage.
Anonymous wrote:All thing being equal if you have two kids with similar stats, the full pay kid is going to be admitted.
Anonymous wrote:What isn't often discussed, but should be is that if you can fully pay for university and don't need any financial aid, you get an edge up in admissions. Most kids at a Big 3 have parents who can fully pay AND are willing to fully pay for private college. All thing being equal if you have two kids with similar stats, the full pay kid is going to be admitted.
It really is affirmative action for rich people. Most people have to fully pay. Our HHI is around $175,000. We can't pay for a Big 3 or private university.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only 10 percent of Big 3 seniors end up at top undergrads?
Correct.
Anonymous wrote:^ you essentially agree with the posters main point though. Top 10% at good public’s are working just as hard and are just as bright as the kids at $45k+ per year Big 3s. I can understand the bitterness that they feel when they realize all that $ paid didn’t confer an admission advantage.
Anonymous wrote:Only 10 percent of Big 3 seniors end up at top undergrads?