Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NNAT measures spatial reasoning. Iready measures math achievement. The tests don’t even remotely measure the same thing.
You're right. Both tests are essentially meaningless.
No they're definitely not meaningless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NNAT measures spatial reasoning. Iready measures math achievement. The tests don’t even remotely measure the same thing.
You're right. Both tests are essentially meaningless.
Anonymous wrote:This chart gives the percentile correspondence for each score in iready. http://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/7539/urlt/i-Ready-Table-6.pdf
So, how did your AAP kids or 2nd graders who are applying this year do in iready?
One kid scored 97th percentile in reading and way over the 99th percentile mark in math, which fits completely with my expectations. My older child scored only 85th percentile in reading and 97th in math. I'm shocked by the reading score, since this kid has has had perfect scores on the reading SOL each year and is a strong reader. Now I'm wondering what the score distribution looks like for AAP kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did you get your child's ready scores? They did not come with the report card.
They were mailed to us a couple weeks before the report card.
Anonymous wrote:Is780 good for my child in math?
Anonymous wrote:My 3rd grader is in AAP and last year she scored below average on her reading iReady. I knew it was crap since she could read just fine, and so did her teacher. Do not take any stock in those scores. I know the teachers definitely don't.
Anonymous wrote:How did you get your child's ready scores? They did not come with the report card.