Anonymous wrote:Sounds like people were abusing the previous return policy and they tired of it and decided it wasn't sustainable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is very unappealing to me because I stock up a few times a year and its more than likely we won't even take the tags off for 60 days. I purposely buy off season to save money so with a return policy of only 2 months its basically final sale for us.
Right but most businesses can't support that. They are moving towards the norm. Stop stocking up and then returning things, and instead buy only what you need. Honestly I do that most of the time anyhow because sizing is never perfect, kids grow, and tastes change.
Target allows a 90 day return window, so I'll throw another vote in for their clothes. We've had good quality for most Cat and Jack stuff in the last few years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uh, sorry you can’t return your USED undergarments OP. Sounds like people like you are the reason they changed their policy.
Are you a troll? have you ever purchased HA clothing? Their message was that these clothes can be passed down. High quality that doesn't fall apart, seams falling apart, etc.
If you're paying $65 for a cotton slip and it falls apart after 2 washes, their former policy was that they would take it back. so when you're paying that amount, you know it will last or they will refund the $$.
Now - I am not paying $65 for that same slip, knowing that it isn't well made and probably won't last.
NP. If you're paying $65 for a cotton slip for a child, you've got bigger problems than return policies. Just sayin'.
why? if it can be worn by multiple children bc it's supposed to wash and wear like new, year after year. Instead of going cheap Amazon that ends up in a landfill after 2 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here - i agree with all of you. Their quality has dropped considerably. I'm not shelling out $45 for a shirt that may not last after 2 or 3 washes.
It's a shame. I will be going to Old Navy,too, I suppose.
That is the issue with buying ahead. The policy is reasonable.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - i agree with all of you. Their quality has dropped considerably. I'm not shelling out $45 for a shirt that may not last after 2 or 3 washes.
It's a shame. I will be going to Old Navy,too, I suppose.
Anonymous wrote:Uh, sorry you can’t return your USED undergarments OP. Sounds like people like you are the reason they changed their policy. [/quote
Not OP but once a kid wears something it's used. You think it's acceptable to pay for a child's shirt that starts falling apart after three washes??? Really?