Anonymous wrote:I'm a single mom living in DC, and I was able to adopt a healthy baby through domestic adoption. The process took only about nine months (from starting the homestudy to the baby's arrival). The birth parents were poor, but they certainly didn't sell their child. I did pay for some of their living expenses, but only for a few months.
Good luck to you, and I hope the process goes smoothly and quickly!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone had experience with this? We're about to throw in the towel on treatment and love the idea of adopting, but are scared about the details, especially since we have an older child to consider. Did you decide for or against adoption after infertility (especially secondary infertility)? Could you share your experiences either way?
Adoption is trauma. What do you love about the idea?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You obviously have issues. When I adopted my child, internationally (see, your biases are not always correct), the country DID have orphanages full of babies who had been left in public by their families. The families did so for social and economic reasons. They were UNKNOWN.
Sorry that YOU were traumatized somewhere along the way. But the people I met in my adoption journey were not RICH or greedy, they cared deeply about ensuring that these children got safe, loving homes. I saw that happen over and over again.
(Note: private adoptions can be very shady, I agree. Particularly those in poor parts of South America. I encourage all potential adoptive parents to work with ESTABLISHED adoption agencies rather than private attorneys.)
There are a lot of unethical practices in international adoptions. If you don't realize this, you are naive.
Anonymous wrote:You obviously have issues. When I adopted my child, internationally (see, your biases are not always correct), the country DID have orphanages full of babies who had been left in public by their families. The families did so for social and economic reasons. They were UNKNOWN.
Sorry that YOU were traumatized somewhere along the way. But the people I met in my adoption journey were not RICH or greedy, they cared deeply about ensuring that these children got safe, loving homes. I saw that happen over and over again.
(Note: private adoptions can be very shady, I agree. Particularly those in poor parts of South America. I encourage all potential adoptive parents to work with ESTABLISHED adoption agencies rather than private attorneys.)
Anonymous wrote:They are not trying to replace their biological child.
They want to parent, and this is a path open to them.
You are very screwed up. I hope you have no children, via any route. But I am sorry about whatever has happened to you,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No. Most families who adopt infants create the trauma by creating the insanely profitable market for infant adoptions. You are deluding yourself by thinking that there are orphanages filled with healthy infants waiting for second chances because they have parents who don’t want to parent them. That’s not how it works in domestic infant adoption.
Adoption counselors coerce vulnerable women into believing that they best way they can love their babies is to give them to a wealthier family to raise. They teach young mothers that wanting to parent when you are poor or sick or lack a lot of family support is sefish. The industry CREATES trauma, trauma that can last generations.
How dare you? Seriously, HOW DARE YOU? Who do you think you are to sit in your little home so smugly deciding why women choose to place their children for adoption and try to take that option away from them? Must a woman leave her infant at a firehouse so he can be placed into the foster system for a few years before YOU decide that it's appropriate for him to have a family who loves him? If you convinced every family not to adopt, there would be more abortions. And I'm pro-choice, so it is fine with me if a woman chooses an abortion. But if a woman does not want to abort and does not feel that she can parent, she can choose adoption and I HATE people like you who are trying to take that choice away from them. You are not doing these women or the children any favors. YES, let's support the women who want to parent but need financial and other support, absolutely. YES, let's make the adoption industry as open and transparent and ethical as possible. But you are a condescending jerk who thinks you know every woman's mind and what she really wants to do and wants to take away her options, all under the guise of what's really better for everybody, because, somehow you know the answer to that. People like this just make me sick, they really do. OP, do your homework. Domestic infant adoptions absolutely can be ethical and also there are ways to make it affordable.
+1. Seriously, WTF? Blame shady adoption lawyers and agencies, crisis pregnancy centers, lawmakers that cut funding to social services, and whomever else is creating the system that enables predatory adoption counselors to coerce women. Why on earth would you blame the families that likely have been through years of trauma and loss themselves, and have turned to adoption because they want to give a baby a loving family? They're being fed lies and taken advantage of the same as the women that place their children for adoption.
If you are adopting due to your own trauma or the child is a replacement child for the biological child you could not have, just don’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No. Most families who adopt infants create the trauma by creating the insanely profitable market for infant adoptions. You are deluding yourself by thinking that there are orphanages filled with healthy infants waiting for second chances because they have parents who don’t want to parent them. That’s not how it works in domestic infant adoption.
Adoption counselors coerce vulnerable women into believing that they best way they can love their babies is to give them to a wealthier family to raise. They teach young mothers that wanting to parent when you are poor or sick or lack a lot of family support is sefish. The industry CREATES trauma, trauma that can last generations.
How dare you? Seriously, HOW DARE YOU? Who do you think you are to sit in your little home so smugly deciding why women choose to place their children for adoption and try to take that option away from them? Must a woman leave her infant at a firehouse so he can be placed into the foster system for a few years before YOU decide that it's appropriate for him to have a family who loves him? If you convinced every family not to adopt, there would be more abortions. And I'm pro-choice, so it is fine with me if a woman chooses an abortion. But if a woman does not want to abort and does not feel that she can parent, she can choose adoption and I HATE people like you who are trying to take that choice away from them. You are not doing these women or the children any favors. YES, let's support the women who want to parent but need financial and other support, absolutely. YES, let's make the adoption industry as open and transparent and ethical as possible. But you are a condescending jerk who thinks you know every woman's mind and what she really wants to do and wants to take away her options, all under the guise of what's really better for everybody, because, somehow you know the answer to that. People like this just make me sick, they really do. OP, do your homework. Domestic infant adoptions absolutely can be ethical and also there are ways to make it affordable.
+1. Seriously, WTF? Blame shady adoption lawyers and agencies, crisis pregnancy centers, lawmakers that cut funding to social services, and whomever else is creating the system that enables predatory adoption counselors to coerce women. Why on earth would you blame the families that likely have been through years of trauma and loss themselves, and have turned to adoption because they want to give a baby a loving family? They're being fed lies and taken advantage of the same as the women that place their children for adoption.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No. Most families who adopt infants create the trauma by creating the insanely profitable market for infant adoptions. You are deluding yourself by thinking that there are orphanages filled with healthy infants waiting for second chances because they have parents who don’t want to parent them. That’s not how it works in domestic infant adoption.
Adoption counselors coerce vulnerable women into believing that they best way they can love their babies is to give them to a wealthier family to raise. They teach young mothers that wanting to parent when you are poor or sick or lack a lot of family support is sefish. The industry CREATES trauma, trauma that can last generations.
How dare you? Seriously, HOW DARE YOU? Who do you think you are to sit in your little home so smugly deciding why women choose to place their children for adoption and try to take that option away from them? Must a woman leave her infant at a firehouse so he can be placed into the foster system for a few years before YOU decide that it's appropriate for him to have a family who loves him? If you convinced every family not to adopt, there would be more abortions. And I'm pro-choice, so it is fine with me if a woman chooses an abortion. But if a woman does not want to abort and does not feel that she can parent, she can choose adoption and I HATE people like you who are trying to take that choice away from them. You are not doing these women or the children any favors. YES, let's support the women who want to parent but need financial and other support, absolutely. YES, let's make the adoption industry as open and transparent and ethical as possible. But you are a condescending jerk who thinks you know every woman's mind and what she really wants to do and wants to take away her options, all under the guise of what's really better for everybody, because, somehow you know the answer to that. People like this just make me sick, they really do. OP, do your homework. Domestic infant adoptions absolutely can be ethical and also there are ways to make it affordable.
Anonymous wrote:
No. Most families who adopt infants create the trauma by creating the insanely profitable market for infant adoptions. You are deluding yourself by thinking that there are orphanages filled with healthy infants waiting for second chances because they have parents who don’t want to parent them. That’s not how it works in domestic infant adoption.
Adoption counselors coerce vulnerable women into believing that they best way they can love their babies is to give them to a wealthier family to raise. They teach young mothers that wanting to parent when you are poor or sick or lack a lot of family support is sefish. The industry CREATES trauma, trauma that can last generations.