Anonymous wrote:My first question is why is your 15 year old son and sophomore friends partying and ahnging out with a bunch of newly teen middle school girls?
Add in the unsupervised by a partying teenager and liberally permissive parents, nothing good can come of this.
If/when he sleeps with one of the lttle girls, is the age range enough for statuatory rape charges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First, no, my 15YO boy would not be there.
Second, obviously the girls got caught and blamed the boys, saying they all just showed up uninvited and what could we do? So they threw the boys under the bus once and are ready to do it again if trouble happens -- don't let it be your kid next time.
Wow. Way to blame girls for boys getting in trouble. So, your son(s) are angels until a girl is around. Got it.
You have zero knowledge of what exactly happened but you're making up a story to fit a bigger view that girls are trouble and boys are so easily led astray, poor dears. Great lesson to teach boys.
NP here, I think the person overreaching here is you. This isn't a gender issue. This is a home resident vs guest issue. Get a grip.
Oh, I agree, the OP's situation is about "guests" who aren't guests at all and whom the homeowner has said are not welcome.
But I wasn't addressing that; I was addressing the one PP above who is the one who made this about gender--not me. Sorry you missed that. The PP says, based on nothing at all that the OP posted, that "obviously" girls were the instigators who "threw the boys under the bus" -- poor, beleaguered boys, made victims by evil girls. If that PP leaps straight to that assumption, well, I'd bet that PP has sons and thinks they can do no wrong.
So, I'm not overreaching on OP's initial post because I'm not addressing it. I'm addressing that one PP's nasty little assumption. Of course the girls could have heaved patio furniture into the pool and damaged it. So could the boys. But the PP immediately blaming the girls based on nothing but the fact they ARE girls is pathetic and misogynistic.
Holy crap, you are reading way, way too much into that and totally out of context. Get a grip.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing personal OP, but are you high? I've got a 15yo boy and there's no way in hell he'd be anywhere that house with my permission. It's an (another) accident waiting to happen. Do you want your son bearing the responsibility of that accident, whatever it might be?
Anonymous wrote:Good lord no. All it takes is one kid to do something really stupid and next thing you know your kid is guilty by association, even if he wasn’t involved. I’m not a helicopter parent, and even I think this is a bad idea.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First, no, my 15YO boy would not be there.
Second, obviously the girls got caught and blamed the boys, saying they all just showed up uninvited and what could we do? So they threw the boys under the bus once and are ready to do it again if trouble happens -- don't let it be your kid next time.
Wow. Way to blame girls for boys getting in trouble. So, your son(s) are angels until a girl is around. Got it.
You have zero knowledge of what exactly happened but you're making up a story to fit a bigger view that girls are trouble and boys are so easily led astray, poor dears. Great lesson to teach boys.
NP here, I think the person overreaching here is you. This isn't a gender issue. This is a home resident vs guest issue. Get a grip.
Oh, I agree, the OP's situation is about "guests" who aren't guests at all and whom the homeowner has said are not welcome.
But I wasn't addressing that; I was addressing the one PP above who is the one who made this about gender--not me. Sorry you missed that. The PP says, based on nothing at all that the OP posted, that "obviously" girls were the instigators who "threw the boys under the bus" -- poor, beleaguered boys, made victims by evil girls. If that PP leaps straight to that assumption, well, I'd bet that PP has sons and thinks they can do no wrong.
So, I'm not overreaching on OP's initial post because I'm not addressing it. I'm addressing that one PP's nasty little assumption. Of course the girls could have heaved patio furniture into the pool and damaged it. So could the boys. But the PP immediately blaming the girls based on nothing but the fact they ARE girls is pathetic and misogynistic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First, no, my 15YO boy would not be there.
Second, obviously the girls got caught and blamed the boys, saying they all just showed up uninvited and what could we do? So they threw the boys under the bus once and are ready to do it again if trouble happens -- don't let it be your kid next time.
Wow. Way to blame girls for boys getting in trouble. So, your son(s) are angels until a girl is around. Got it.
You have zero knowledge of what exactly happened but you're making up a story to fit a bigger view that girls are trouble and boys are so easily led astray, poor dears. Great lesson to teach boys.
Anonymous wrote:Is the child asking this question or the adult?
Outside fun? You really think a child will never go inside if everyone else does? What if they need to use the bathroom?
It is nuts to think a child will stay outside or go home from a fun party if everyone else moves indoors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- I didn’t allow it at all at first when I found out no parent ever there. But only 1 other mom out of 7 neighborhood boys have issue with this- so rest of kids always there- of course- who wouldn’t want to hang at huge house with lots of toys, teen girls and no parents. Then the other mom allowed her son son outside only and I agreed that’s ok. Then the pool damage happened- kids threw patio furniture in deep end damaging pool. My son didn’t do that - it was one kid/ but the homeowner texted all the neighbors boys parents with the warning of please invite only and respect his property.
So bigger issue is, why am I about the only parent not concerned with boys/ girls unsupervised. Am I way too strict? Most of the neighborhood boys are good overall- couple get bit rowdy- but most are equally unsupervised with parents having busy social lives.
I want to follow my gut - but also be open to someone saying I am way to strict if I’m being too protective- strict??? I trust my son, but still feel like boys don’t need to go over there.
And yes, it would help if the dad would text it is ok- since he asked for kids to only come with invite.
I grew up going to parties like this and weed and alcohol come out. Bedrooms ventured into. Slut shaming the next day. Add phones. Add lawyers. You are not overreacting. You are parenting young teens. Age 17-18, sure no problem. 13-15. Crazy. Protect your kid.
+1
Neighborhood kid with uber crazy parents now suing neighborhood parents for alcohol poisoning. No one is surprised, sadly.