Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should teach Arabic at the same school. Now that would be interesting.
One of the Jewish day schools in Md offers Arabic as an elective, but till HS, I think. My kid did Jewish Day School through 4th grade, spent a year in Israel, became fluent in Hebrew, took intro Arabic in college, said the Hebrew helped a lot in learning Arabic.
Another related semitic language that might appeal in this area would be Amharic.
most eithiopians teach their kids amharic in the home and in church.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should teach Arabic at the same school. Now that would be interesting.
One of the Jewish day schools in Md offers Arabic as an elective, but till HS, I think. My kid did Jewish Day School through 4th grade, spent a year in Israel, became fluent in Hebrew, took intro Arabic in college, said the Hebrew helped a lot in learning Arabic.
Another related semitic language that might appeal in this area would be Amharic.
Anonymous wrote:Jewish families I know have no interest in Sela because if they are practicing, they want Hebrew and a Jewish education. If they are secular but culturally Jewish, it still seems pointless. Learning Hebrew is pretty pointless unless are you Jewish.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually could imagine a "Sela to Arabic" transition. I bet many Israelis could teach Arabic to little kids just fine, given the extent to which they learn it. You get a few staff in place, get some curricular prep down to make it a strong elective, then use it more and more. Get an OK from PCSB and then make Arabic the primary, Hebrew the secondary language other than English and there you are. A global language school in DC.
Its 2 main outside funders, who combined gave $165K in 2016-17 would probably have an issue with that. https://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/report/990_SELAPCS.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This school is the school CMI wanted to be, but could never really deliver: strong academics, diverse, small classroom size, and inclusive. Folks have been hating on them since the beginning, but they continue to have solid scores, solid finances, and happy kids. Their building and location are fine. Not great, but fine. I am happy as a taxpayer that this little school that could has survived.
Nothing against Sela but you are NUTS if you think Sela is "the school CMI wanted to be". All you have to do is look at each school and the speed at which families jump ship at the 1st chance they get at what they consider a better school. Sela has tons of turnover and people jumping ship each year. CMI has way less turnover, WAY less. By miles.
Ha! Not actually true - Sela has strong retention rates these days, whereas CMI has been revealed to have crap academics, mistreated teachers, and the leadership was forced out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This school is the school CMI wanted to be, but could never really deliver: strong academics, diverse, small classroom size, and inclusive. Folks have been hating on them since the beginning, but they continue to have solid scores, solid finances, and happy kids. Their building and location are fine. Not great, but fine. I am happy as a taxpayer that this little school that could has survived.
Nothing against Sela but you are NUTS if you think Sela is "the school CMI wanted to be". All you have to do is look at each school and the speed at which families jump ship at the 1st chance they get at what they consider a better school. Sela has tons of turnover and people jumping ship each year. CMI has way less turnover, WAY less. By miles.
Anonymous wrote:This school is the school CMI wanted to be, but could never really deliver: strong academics, diverse, small classroom size, and inclusive. Folks have been hating on them since the beginning, but they continue to have solid scores, solid finances, and happy kids. Their building and location are fine. Not great, but fine. I am happy as a taxpayer that this little school that could has survived.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was explained to me that all the classes are taught in English but they have Hebrew class/lessons every day. As well as it being incorporated into music and art classes etc. If this is still correct than is a more traditional charter with early language learning that is certainly being overlooked. It seems to be a great little school. And a lot of probably has to do with location and demographics. That might change, as other school become harder to get into more folks might try it out.
Those obsessed with middle school paths never will.
Pk3 abd 4 are immersion with an English and Hebrew teacher. You’re right about the rest of the grades, but starting this year with kindergarten, they’re going to make it immersion like in PK and add that immersion program to each year (so in two years, first grade willl be fully immersive, etc).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm pro-sela. Staff seems to really care, students seem well-behaved, environment seems positive. I think a Hebrew language immersion is a gateway to Arabic as the languages are very similar (like Italian and Spanish) so very useful as well.
The commute would be reverse for us since were in CH with a metro there to hop right to work. That said, we don't go there because of the commute and would rather a closer school even with less amenities with two working parents who are stretched for time as it is. We also don't buy into the obsession for being bilingual.
It seems that it's all about the branding tho. Some schools have better branding even if the language isn't truly that useful on a daily basis and other schools don't. Some schools seem to have huge demand even though they aren't good schools. Sela is one of the better schools but just no demand.
Enough demand to fill the school, though. Perhaps less demand among UMC white parents - not sure that’s a real metric for success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should teach Arabic at the same school. Now that would be interesting.
That would be useful. As a Jew, I wonder if these kids will be served being bi-lingual in a language that isn't highly critical. Also as attitudes towards Israel change how marketable knowing Hebrew would be.
How fluent would they even be in Hebrew if they stop learning it in 5th grade? No MS or HS public school where they could continue the language. .
This school as taxpayer school should never have been approved, nor any other school in non-commonly used languages. Hebrew could have been offered as a language at a charter or DCPS school, plenty of other ways to spend taxpayer money. DC Charter school board needs to be held to higher accountability and offer schools that more people want. Also, sick of schools closing and opening, complete waste of money.
200 kids at the school, generally high performing. Why is it a waste of money? Also, the primary issues of schools opening and closing aren't wasting money. They received per pupil money for the students that they enrolled and served them for the time they were there. They didn't get per pupil money that wasn't used or went to waste.
Anonymous wrote:The families that leaves tend to be observant and less into the Hebrew thing.