Anonymous wrote:When they are little, their parents 'before' features haven't come out yet in their faces, especially noses. It's no Habsburg jaw, though, that's for sure.
Anonymous wrote:This forum is obsessed with saying everyone looks average except for their children of course. Those are, objectively, two good-looking children. They are also extremely well-behaved, composed, and put-together and always have been. I'm a pretty avid royal watcher and these two seem to have had a good upbringing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was the original "different strokes" and I stand by it. There are some posters here who LOVE to act as if the royal children are far and away the best looking kids. In my opinion it's not true. None of the children in the British royal family are anything beyond cute (I'm a huge MM fan and the "Archie is Gorgeous" was just as ridiculous) and neither are these girls.
There are children that make you stop in public and comment on their looks; that's my criteria for "beautiful/gorgeous". Would you honestly do a double take at these girls if you didn't know who they were? I highly doubt it.
Truly. That’s why some people have their tongues so far up these people’s asses. They don’t deserve democracy, they’d rather be ruled by inbreds. But they’re “so lovely”, so it’s all ok.
Whatever. You're the one posting on this thread so obviously you were still interested enough to click on the link. I'm no royalist but I find it mildly fun to gossip (in a fun and totally non malicious) way about royalty, or celebrities, or famous people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was the original "different strokes" and I stand by it. There are some posters here who LOVE to act as if the royal children are far and away the best looking kids. In my opinion it's not true. None of the children in the British royal family are anything beyond cute (I'm a huge MM fan and the "Archie is Gorgeous" was just as ridiculous) and neither are these girls.
There are children that make you stop in public and comment on their looks; that's my criteria for "beautiful/gorgeous". Would you honestly do a double take at these girls if you didn't know who they were? I highly doubt it.
Truly. That’s why some people have their tongues so far up these people’s asses. They don’t deserve democracy, they’d rather be ruled by inbreds. But they’re “so lovely”, so it’s all ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone can't find the Spanish princesses lovely then it frightens me to consider what they think must constitute beautiful.
The girls are lovely. True, they have the benefit of health, diet, grooming and deportment, but they are well put together and that really is all that matters at the end of the day. Anything beyond that is merely subjective.
Are you always this dramatic?