Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alan Dershowitz: I had a "perfect, perfect sex life during the relevant period of time"
<SHUDDER>
https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1152048480594137090?s=21

Dershowitz said he had sex with just one woman -- carefully dodging the fact that the accusations surrounding Epstein and his supporters have to do with girls, not women.

Anonymous wrote:Alan Dershowitz: I had a "perfect, perfect sex life during the relevant period of time"
<SHUDDER>
https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1152048480594137090?s=21

Anonymous wrote:He will stay in jail - bail denied.

Thoughts and Prayers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The elephant in the room is that the wildly successful/powerful/rich/etc get ahead by being indifferent to others. There’s massively more rot all around than DCUM’s monomaniacal obsession with Trump assumes and I’d be very glad if ANYONE guilty of this stuff is caught. All of you should also be glad instead of making up these weird stories about coverups, which sound as stupid as pizzagate!

I think most of us who are “obsessing” over Trump’s involvement agree that ANYONE who is guilty needs to be caught. The focus on Trump is due to the fact that HE IS CURRENTLY THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD!

The publicly available evidence of his involvement is probably the weakest of all public figures so far identified. Given that we’ve seen years of lurid accusations against Trump that are always walked backed, it looks like TDS is still alive and well.

Now, hiring under the table Polish laborers and having them deported before paying them seems more much likely, but strangely less discussed.

A former IT contractor for Jeffrey Epstein who said that he ended their business relationship over personal concerns about gaggles of apparently unsupervised young women on the embattled financier's private island told ABC News that his reluctance to continue working there was underscored by what he said was an extensive collection of photos of topless women displayed throughout the island's compounds.

“There were photos of topless women everywhere," said contractor Steve Scully, who said he worked for Epstein for six years beginning in 1999. "On his desk, in his office, in his bedroom,” Scully, a 69-year-old father of three girls, said of the private island dubbed "Little St. James."

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I bet some of the blackmail money to Epstein came from the British royal family. They'd do anything to keep Prince Andrew out of this.

I just cannot understand that mindset, if true (and it seems likely), to protect one’s pedophile child rather than protecting children from pedophiles. Do they think it’s exaggerated? Made up? Not that bad if the girl was x?


It would do epic harm to the royal family as an institution, which is the bigger issue.

Queen Elizabeth has worked her entire life for “the Firm.” No, they will not sacrifice what they have for teenage girls.

If he is guilty and gets exposed, it is going to be so much worse for them. So so much worse. I read a lot of royal gossip, so I know about the queen’s devotion to her job, but good god - cut him off and cut him out. If he gets exposed, it might end the royal family (as I understand that fully 50% of British people don’t support the monarchy).


My theory is they can’t control how much information about this would come out so they would prefer it be none at all. If Andrew is a pedophile, it would mean that they have already known and covered it up for decades. And they have enough power and money to still believe that they can control this.

Exactly. It's like the cover up by the Catholic Church in their pedophile scandals.