Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many women on DCUM suggest often that women should not be a SAHM because you can't count on your H to support the family by himself and should do your part in that regard from the beginning, despite the possibility that having a SAHM when they are very young could be the best care a child can get.
So I would also suggest that no wife should assume their husband will be around and will be willing to take care of them when they are elderly or infirm. Provide for yourself, make plans for yourself, whether it's an issue now or for later on.
Personally I'm 100% counting on my adult children to do whatever they can both financially and physically to care for me as I get older should the need arise. They have both assured me I have nothing to worry about in that regard.
Not only did they see me and my siblings care for our elderly mother until the day she died they also have vivid and happy memories of me caring for them when they were little, until they were both in school full time.
I'm a SAHM and it is still my job and my husband's job to plan for our old age. I'm not putting that responsibility on my kids. No way will I do that. They need to be able to work and raise their own families. I am grateful that my own parents have felt the same way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can’t rely on him now- his ADD is something fierce and I pray all the time I don’t become physically or mentally I capacitated even for a week in the hospital.
Last kid to get into college and then I need to majorly evaluate why I’m here. It’s a real struggle.
I'm with you, OP. Let me guess? DH has a routine/act down so the ADD does not show to outsiders (or they have no idea from not having to live with it) - so DH looks "perfect", right? It is a special kind of hell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many women on DCUM suggest often that women should not be a SAHM because you can't count on your H to support the family by himself and should do your part in that regard from the beginning, despite the possibility that having a SAHM when they are very young could be the best care a child can get.
So I would also suggest that no wife should assume their husband will be around and will be willing to take care of them when they are elderly or infirm. Provide for yourself, make plans for yourself, whether it's an issue now or for later on.
Personally I'm 100% counting on my adult children to do whatever they can both financially and physically to care for me as I get older should the need arise. They have both assured me I have nothing to worry about in that regard.
Not only did they see me and my siblings care for our elderly mother until the day she died they also have vivid and happy memories of me caring for them when they were little, until they were both in school full time.
I'm a SAHM and it is still my job and my husband's job to plan for our old age. I'm not putting that responsibility on my kids. No way will I do that. They need to be able to work and raise their own families. I am grateful that my own parents have felt the same way.
Anonymous wrote:I think very few women expect their husband to care for them in their old age, so welcome to our world. We generally outlive our husbands plus men are typically not great at care taking task (for cultural reasons—I’m not implying there is anything predetermined about this). If my husband is still alive when I am this way (doubtful), I’d trust him to drive me to doctors appointments and hire a caregiver but not much else. Daughters or long term care insurance is what most women plan for. Or a bottle of pills in the bathroom.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a 69yo retired FED who married a 29yo foreign born spouse three years ago. She knows when I pass she gets my life insurance, $670k TSP, and half my pension for the rest of her life. She will take good care of me for the rest of my life and, in return, she will be financially secure for the rest of hers.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a 69yo retired FED who married a 29yo foreign born spouse three years ago. She knows when I pass she gets my life insurance, $670k TSP, and half my pension for the rest of her life. She will take good care of me for the rest of my life and, in return, she will be financially secure for the rest of hers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m counting on him getting me euthanized if my ass needs wiping from someone other than me.
Not in this area.
+1, I hope in our lifetime its allowed, especially after having to care for a loved one with dementia. It was a horrible death to suffer for years and the final few weeks were horrific.
Consider moving to one of those states that allow this. CA and Oregon come to mind.
Anonymous wrote:Many women on DCUM suggest often that women should not be a SAHM because you can't count on your H to support the family by himself and should do your part in that regard from the beginning, despite the possibility that having a SAHM when they are very young could be the best care a child can get.
So I would also suggest that no wife should assume their husband will be around and will be willing to take care of them when they are elderly or infirm. Provide for yourself, make plans for yourself, whether it's an issue now or for later on.
Personally I'm 100% counting on my adult children to do whatever they can both financially and physically to care for me as I get older should the need arise. They have both assured me I have nothing to worry about in that regard.
Not only did they see me and my siblings care for our elderly mother until the day she died they also have vivid and happy memories of me caring for them when they were little, until they were both in school full time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m counting on him getting me euthanized if my ass needs wiping from someone other than me.
Not in this area.
+1, I hope in our lifetime its allowed, especially after having to care for a loved one with dementia. It was a horrible death to suffer for years and the final few weeks were horrific.
Anonymous wrote:Many women on DCUM suggest often that women should not be a SAHM because you can't count on your H to support the family by himself and should do your part in that regard from the beginning, despite the possibility that having a SAHM when they are very young could be the best care a child can get.
So I would also suggest that no wife should assume their husband will be around and will be willing to take care of them when they are elderly or infirm. Provide for yourself, make plans for yourself, whether it's an issue now or for later on..
Anonymous wrote:Based on the number of times women have said they don't want to "take care of" a man in his old age, I'd say any man who relies on a woman to help him in his old age is foolhardy indeed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gosh.
My BIL was deeply involved in caregiving for my mom (his MIL) during many years when she lived with him and my sister and had a long string of medical issues--starting with knee surgery and moving along through TIA's, hip fracture, ruptured small intestine/ileostomy bag, 4 years of dialysis, Hoyer lift and hospital bed the final 5 years. His parents were kinda chilly and remote, there were 15 years between him and his next older sibling, and he always felt more like he was part of my sister's family than his own.
I do think that if you can't count on your spouse to be able to bathe you and wipe you if/when it comes to that, you don't have a spouse.
Do you supplement your sister and bil?