Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jesuits, continuing their centuries-long tradition of poking the church in the eye.

Good for them!

Hell yeah?..
Then you probably must have slept through the history class when they were teaching about the Inquisition and counterreformation.

Anonymous wrote:Jesuits, continuing their centuries-long tradition of poking the church in the eye.

Good for them!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. I can kind of understand where they are coming from. Homosexual marriage is not recognized by the Catholic Church. So according to the church, this teacher is living with and sleeping with someone outside of wedlock and discussing it with the students. If it was an unmarried heterosexual teacher living with a partner and talking about it with the kids, they would sure as shit be fired. And if this teacher was unmarried or just kept it to himself, it probably would continue to be ignored.

Maybe I missed something, but it's not at all clear from the article that the teacher discussed his marriage with his students. It sounds like someone found out about it (hard to keep one's marriage totally private, after all) and made an issue of it.

I doubt they are prepared to fire all the unmarried but sexually active teachers, or the teachers who use artificial birth control, or the teachers who violate some other aspect of Catholic teachings.

It looks like he put it up on Facebook.
I feel pretty certain that they are prepared to fire all of the teachers who are posting about their birth control and sexual activity on Facebook.

He posted about his MARRIAGE on Facebook. What about teachers who have been remarried? (But no annulment) What about the many many teachers who live with their fiancés before getting married? What about them? Should they be fired too?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. I can kind of understand where they are coming from. Homosexual marriage is not recognized by the Catholic Church. So according to the church, this teacher is living with and sleeping with someone outside of wedlock and discussing it with the students. If it was an unmarried heterosexual teacher living with a partner and talking about it with the kids, they would sure as shit be fired. And if this teacher was unmarried or just kept it to himself, it probably would continue to be ignored.

Maybe I missed something, but it's not at all clear from the article that the teacher discussed his marriage with his students. It sounds like someone found out about it (hard to keep one's marriage totally private, after all) and made an issue of it.

I doubt they are prepared to fire all the unmarried but sexually active teachers, or the teachers who use artificial birth control, or the teachers who violate some other aspect of Catholic teachings.

It looks like he put it up on Facebook.
I feel pretty certain that they are prepared to fire all of the teachers who are posting about their birth control and sexual activity on Facebook.

He posted about his MARRIAGE on Facebook. What about teachers who have been remarried? (But no annulment) What about the many many teachers who live with their fiancés before getting married? What about them? Should they be fired too?

Yes, if the school is actually Catholic, they would be fired. SSPX schools don’t allow anyone who falls into any of those categories to teach.
In Christ
SSPX poster

No one cares what SSPX schools do. They are not Catholic schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. I can kind of understand where they are coming from. Homosexual marriage is not recognized by the Catholic Church. So according to the church, this teacher is living with and sleeping with someone outside of wedlock and discussing it with the students. If it was an unmarried heterosexual teacher living with a partner and talking about it with the kids, they would sure as shit be fired. And if this teacher was unmarried or just kept it to himself, it probably would continue to be ignored.

Maybe I missed something, but it's not at all clear from the article that the teacher discussed his marriage with his students. It sounds like someone found out about it (hard to keep one's marriage totally private, after all) and made an issue of it.

I doubt they are prepared to fire all the unmarried but sexually active teachers, or the teachers who use artificial birth control, or the teachers who violate some other aspect of Catholic teachings.

It looks like he put it up on Facebook.
I feel pretty certain that they are prepared to fire all of the teachers who are posting about their birth control and sexual activity on Facebook.

More BS. A Bishop recently retired to an SSPX school and Francis approved it
https://international.la-croix.com/news/retired-swiss-bishop-to-live-in-sspx-home/10152

Even Francis views the Society as C@tholic. SSPX schools are the most Catholic schools in the world.
In Christ
SSPX poster

He posted about his MARRIAGE on Facebook. What about teachers who have been remarried? (But no annulment) What about the many many teachers who live with their fiancés before getting married? What about them? Should they be fired too?

Yes, if the school is actually Catholic, they would be fired. SSPX schools don’t allow anyone who falls into any of those categories to teach.
In Christ
SSPX poster

No one cares what SSPX schools do. They are not Catholic schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. I can kind of understand where they are coming from. Homosexual marriage is not recognized by the Catholic Church. So according to the church, this teacher is living with and sleeping with someone outside of wedlock and discussing it with the students. If it was an unmarried heterosexual teacher living with a partner and talking about it with the kids, they would sure as shit be fired. And if this teacher was unmarried or just kept it to himself, it probably would continue to be ignored.

Maybe I missed something, but it's not at all clear from the article that the teacher discussed his marriage with his students. It sounds like someone found out about it (hard to keep one's marriage totally private, after all) and made an issue of it.

I doubt they are prepared to fire all the unmarried but sexually active teachers, or the teachers who use artificial birth control, or the teachers who violate some other aspect of Catholic teachings.

It looks like he put it up on Facebook.
I feel pretty certain that they are prepared to fire all of the teachers who are posting about their birth control and sexual activity on Facebook.

He posted about his MARRIAGE on Facebook. What about teachers who have been remarried? (But no annulment) What about the many many teachers who live with their fiancés before getting married? What about them? Should they be fired too?

Yes, if the school is actually Catholic, they would be fired. SSPX schools don’t allow anyone who falls into any of those categories to teach.
In Christ
SSPX poster

Anonymous wrote:Just FYI, SSPX--the Society of St. Pius X--is not an orthodox group. They are cafeteria Catholics who reject Vatican II, and are official considered to be not in Communion with the Catholic Church. Their canonical status is a bit complicated, but the leaders of the society are considered to be in schism (a fact reiterated at least as recently as 2017). So take whatever he says about Catholic doctrine with a huge grain of salt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. I can kind of understand where they are coming from. Homosexual marriage is not recognized by the Catholic Church. So according to the church, this teacher is living with and sleeping with someone outside of wedlock and discussing it with the students. If it was an unmarried heterosexual teacher living with a partner and talking about it with the kids, they would sure as shit be fired. And if this teacher was unmarried or just kept it to himself, it probably would continue to be ignored.

Maybe I missed something, but it's not at all clear from the article that the teacher discussed his marriage with his students. It sounds like someone found out about it (hard to keep one's marriage totally private, after all) and made an issue of it.

I doubt they are prepared to fire all the unmarried but sexually active teachers, or the teachers who use artificial birth control, or the teachers who violate some other aspect of Catholic teachings.

It looks like he put it up on Facebook.
I feel pretty certain that they are prepared to fire all of the teachers who are posting about their birth control and sexual activity on Facebook.

He posted about his MARRIAGE on Facebook. What about teachers who have been remarried? (But no annulment) What about the many many teachers who live with their fiancés before getting married? What about them? Should they be fired too?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a Catholic, I would be much happier if all Catholics were like the Jesuits.

This!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. I can kind of understand where they are coming from. Homosexual marriage is not recognized by the Catholic Church. So according to the church, this teacher is living with and sleeping with someone outside of wedlock and discussing it with the students. If it was an unmarried heterosexual teacher living with a partner and talking about it with the kids, they would sure as shit be fired. And if this teacher was unmarried or just kept it to himself, it probably would continue to be ignored.

Maybe I missed something, but it's not at all clear from the article that the teacher discussed his marriage with his students. It sounds like someone found out about it (hard to keep one's marriage totally private, after all) and made an issue of it.

I doubt they are prepared to fire all the unmarried but sexually active teachers, or the teachers who use artificial birth control, or the teachers who violate some other aspect of Catholic teachings.

It looks like he put it up on Facebook.
I feel pretty certain that they are prepared to fire all of the teachers who are posting about their birth control and sexual activity on Facebook.

Anonymous wrote:I side with the Church. If you can't represent your company with honesty, find another company. There are a million schools where a person can teach. No Chevy dealer is going to have any credibility if he drives a Lexus. The President of a country shouldn't be a citizen of a different country. Talk the talk? Then walk the walk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. I can kind of understand where they are coming from. Homosexual marriage is not recognized by the Catholic Church. So according to the church, this teacher is living with and sleeping with someone outside of wedlock and discussing it with the students. If it was an unmarried heterosexual teacher living with a partner and talking about it with the kids, they would sure as shit be fired. And if this teacher was unmarried or just kept it to himself, it probably would continue to be ignored.

Maybe I missed something, but it's not at all clear from the article that the teacher discussed his marriage with his students. It sounds like someone found out about it (hard to keep one's marriage totally private, after all) and made an issue of it.

I doubt they are prepared to fire all the unmarried but sexually active teachers, or the teachers who use artificial birth control, or the teachers who violate some other aspect of Catholic teachings.

It looks like he put it up on Facebook.
I feel pretty certain that they are prepared to fire all of the teachers who are posting about their birth control and sexual activity on Facebook.

I'm a Catholic school teacher, but not a Catholic. Recently a fellow teacher posted a bunch of pictures of her marriage, the Baptist minister who performed it, and the outdoor ceremony at a location that I know to be in a diocese that doesn't allow it. Obviously, this isn't a marriage recognized by the Catholic church, and since the teacher is a confirmed Catholic, it's a violation of Catholic teachings. Should she be fired?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. I can kind of understand where they are coming from. Homosexual marriage is not recognized by the Catholic Church. So according to the church, this teacher is living with and sleeping with someone outside of wedlock and discussing it with the students. If it was an unmarried heterosexual teacher living with a partner and talking about it with the kids, they would sure as shit be fired. And if this teacher was unmarried or just kept it to himself, it probably would continue to be ignored.

Maybe I missed something, but it's not at all clear from the article that the teacher discussed his marriage with his students. It sounds like someone found out about it (hard to keep one's marriage totally private, after all) and made an issue of it.

I doubt they are prepared to fire all the unmarried but sexually active teachers, or the teachers who use artificial birth control, or the teachers who violate some other aspect of Catholic teachings.

It looks like he put it up on Facebook.
I feel pretty certain that they are prepared to fire all of the teachers who are posting about their birth control and sexual activity on Facebook.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. I can kind of understand where they are coming from. Homosexual marriage is not recognized by the Catholic Church. So according to the church, this teacher is living with and sleeping with someone outside of wedlock and discussing it with the students. If it was an unmarried heterosexual teacher living with a partner and talking about it with the kids, they would sure as shit be fired. And if this teacher was unmarried or just kept it to himself, it probably would continue to be ignored.

Maybe I missed something, but it's not at all clear from the article that the teacher discussed his marriage with his students. It sounds like someone found out about it (hard to keep one's marriage totally private, after all) and made an issue of it.

I doubt they are prepared to fire all the unmarried but sexually active teachers, or the teachers who use artificial birth control, or the teachers who violate some other aspect of Catholic teachings.