Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Let’s get real. The kids were never all at the same level. There was always a variation in skills, interests, background knowledge, and work ethic. The difference I see now is that we get some parents who are less educated themselves so they can’t help at home, less equipped financially to assist with extra materials, less aware of the intense commitment the entire family is making, and less confident in asking teachers to explain a concept differently or reconsider a grade. Under the old system, a family might send three kids through magnet although only the first one was truly gifted and others average because they learned from experience how to make it work. Or they had lots of advice from friends and neighbors with kids who went to magnet. Now there are more kids who are truly trailblazers.
I’ve taught mixed ability general ed. This year’s classes were nothing like that. When MCPS starts admitting to MS magnet fifteen year olds or students reading on a pre-primer level, I’ll be the loudest one protesting.
Signed,
A middle school magnet teacher
That was my impression as a parent with kids in the magnet programs, too.
Also, as a parent with kids in the magnet program, my opinion is that participation in the magnet program should not require an intense commitment by the entire family.
Whether you like it or not, it does. Sending kids to magnet is a family commitment. We are perfectly okay with that.
Not in my family. My oldest requires less commitment than most parents give their kids in local schools (pick ups and drop offs notwithstanding). Perhaps if my youngest had been pushed and prepped and made to go to magnet it would have required that kind of commitment, but that's because he's not an appropriate kid for that program. He's perfectly happy being a straight-A student with all his various interests and activities in his local MS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We turned down CES due to the amount of endless projects. Yes, this is going much deeper into the material, but often projects seem like more work from parents than for students. Honestly, is very clear when parents have done most of the work.
Our daughter is capable of doing the work, but she is already extremely busy with a multitude of language, music, and dance programs. She has at least 10 hours of work from her language program each week already.
Wow... you really failed your child. There weren't endless projects and I never stepped in, even to check homework. I did have awesome conversations with my kid, however, about what they were working on. The teachers did a great job a getting the kids to manage their time. Our kid had two after school activities that typically occurred 4-5 days a week. Kid survived. I think you're actually a troll, but if you really turned down the program for the reasons you posted, you really, really did your kid a disservice. The CES program was life changing for my kid. And we'd do it again 100 times out of 100.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Let’s get real. The kids were never all at the same level. There was always a variation in skills, interests, background knowledge, and work ethic. The difference I see now is that we get some parents who are less educated themselves so they can’t help at home, less equipped financially to assist with extra materials, less aware of the intense commitment the entire family is making, and less confident in asking teachers to explain a concept differently or reconsider a grade. Under the old system, a family might send three kids through magnet although only the first one was truly gifted and others average because they learned from experience how to make it work. Or they had lots of advice from friends and neighbors with kids who went to magnet. Now there are more kids who are truly trailblazers.
I’ve taught mixed ability general ed. This year’s classes were nothing like that. When MCPS starts admitting to MS magnet fifteen year olds or students reading on a pre-primer level, I’ll be the loudest one protesting.
Signed,
A middle school magnet teacher
That was my impression as a parent with kids in the magnet programs, too.
Also, as a parent with kids in the magnet program, my opinion is that participation in the magnet program should not require an intense commitment by the entire family.
Whether you like it or not, it does. Sending kids to magnet is a family commitment. We are perfectly okay with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We turned down CES due to the amount of endless projects. Yes, this is going much deeper into the material, but often projects seem like more work from parents than for students. Honestly, is very clear when parents have done most of the work.
Our daughter is capable of doing the work, but she is already extremely busy with a multitude of language, music, and dance programs. She has at least 10 hours of work from her language program each week already.
Wow... you really failed your child. There weren't endless projects and I never stepped in, even to check homework. I did have awesome conversations with my kid, however, about what they were working on. The teachers did a great job a getting the kids to manage their time. Our kid had two after school activities that typically occurred 4-5 days a week. Kid survived. I think you're actually a troll, but if you really turned down the program for the reasons you posted, you really, really did your kid a disservice. The CES program was life changing for my kid. And we'd do it again 100 times out of 100.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We turned down CES due to the amount of endless projects. Yes, this is going much deeper into the material, but often projects seem like more work from parents than for students. Honestly, is very clear when parents have done most of the work.
Our daughter is capable of doing the work, but she is already extremely busy with a multitude of language, music, and dance programs. She has at least 10 hours of work from her language program each week already.
Wow... you really failed your child. There weren't endless projects and I never stepped in, even to check homework. I did have awesome conversations with my kid, however, about what they were working on. The teachers did a great job a getting the kids to manage their time. Our kid had two after school activities that typically occurred 4-5 days a week. Kid survived. I think you're actually a troll, but if you really turned down the program for the reasons you posted, you really, really did your kid a disservice. The CES program was life changing for my kid. And we'd do it again 100 times out of 100.
Anonymous wrote:We turned down CES due to the amount of endless projects. Yes, this is going much deeper into the material, but often projects seem like more work from parents than for students. Honestly, is very clear when parents have done most of the work.
Our daughter is capable of doing the work, but she is already extremely busy with a multitude of language, music, and dance programs. She has at least 10 hours of work from her language program each week already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Magnet is supposed to be for students who are "gifted and talented." Not "easily driven by parental pressures. "
FIFY
In an ideal world, the students in the magnet would all be gifted and talented. Parents wouldn’t matter at all. But we don’t have an ideal world. And a lot of MCPS parents don’t want that world because it allows them to get their average children into and through ES and MS magnet.
You sound bitter. If saying that makes you feel better, more power to you.
Bitter over what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
We turned down CES due to the amount of endless projects. Yes, this is going much deeper into the material, but often projects seem like more work from parents than for students. Honestly, is very clear when parents have done most of the work.
Our daughter is capable of doing the work, but she is already extremely busy with a multitude of language, music, and dance programs. She has at least 10 hours of work from her language program each week already.
Please stop trolling. You say you turned down the program so how do you have any idea what the projects are all about? You also have no idea that parents do the work. Just based on your response it seems like a case of sour grapes. You sound bitter.
Anonymous wrote:
We turned down CES due to the amount of endless projects. Yes, this is going much deeper into the material, but often projects seem like more work from parents than for students. Honestly, is very clear when parents have done most of the work.
Our daughter is capable of doing the work, but she is already extremely busy with a multitude of language, music, and dance programs. She has at least 10 hours of work from her language program each week already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ what’s wrong with it?
Not that poster, but here is what I hear from some families:
*Disrupted family schedules because of the bus.
*Tension between students and parents over the workload at home.
*Unfairness to other kids in the family who lose parental attention or have to adjust their schedule.
NP here. I have not heard that in my 15 years as a magnet teacher. Most parents are aware of the time committment and they consider themselves a partner in their child's education. Most students are happy within the program, even if some have to work harder to catch up with some of their peers. The truth is that these children are able to do the work and they thrive also because of a very like-ability cohort.
- Magnet teacher.
We turned down CES due to the amount of endless projects. Yes, this is going much deeper into the material, but often projects seem like more work from parents than for students. Honestly, is very clear when parents have done most of the work.
Our daughter is capable of doing the work, but she is already extremely busy with a multitude of language, music, and dance programs. She has at least 10 hours of work from her language program each week already.
Anonymous wrote:I know two Clemente magnet teachers who left in the last few years
Moss and Marks..
Were they good?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Magnet is supposed to be for students who are "gifted and talented." Not "easily driven by parental pressures. "
FIFY
In an ideal world, the students in the magnet would all be gifted and talented. Parents wouldn’t matter at all. But we don’t have an ideal world. And a lot of MCPS parents don’t want that world because it allows them to get their average children into and through ES and MS magnet.
You sound bitter. If saying that makes you feel better, more power to you.