Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hasn't Parisa never been in a courtroom?
Theo did some f'd up things so she deserved to be ousted, but kind of scared of Parisa's glazed over eyes SJW free-for-all mindset.
Parisa has never prosecuted a case, but she’s been in plenty or courtrooms. Prosecuting a case isn’t rocket science, and most cases plead out anyway. She’s a really talented lawyer, so i’m Guessing she can figure out how to do a direct, a plea colloquy, and a sentencing hearing. Not that the person who runs the office should be doing many of those.
Being an innocence lawyer involves investigating whether the claims are BS and, if not, developing facts to prove it. You have to think through how they’ll be in court, whether their testimony will be admissible, whether you can corroborate their story, and whether they’ll appear credible. All of those things are transferable skills and things many of us in the defense community would love to see prosecutors do more of (especially the corroborating).
I’m guessing prosecutors focus on proving their cases beyond a reasonable doubt, within the boundaries of ethics and the law. And sometimes trials can be extremely complicated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hasn't Parisa never been in a courtroom?
Theo did some f'd up things so she deserved to be ousted, but kind of scared of Parisa's glazed over eyes SJW free-for-all mindset.
Parisa has never prosecuted a case, but she’s been in plenty or courtrooms. Prosecuting a case isn’t rocket science, and most cases plead out anyway. She’s a really talented lawyer, so i’m Guessing she can figure out how to do a direct, a plea colloquy, and a sentencing hearing. Not that the person who runs the office should be doing many of those.
Being an innocence lawyer involves investigating whether the claims are BS and, if not, developing facts to prove it. You have to think through how they’ll be in court, whether their testimony will be admissible, whether you can corroborate their story, and whether they’ll appear credible. All of those things are transferable skills and things many of us in the defense community would love to see prosecutors do more of (especially the corroborating).
Where is your defense community?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn’t understand the posts above. Then I did some reading.
Parisa Tafti is a progressive prosecutor who plans to work to end mass incarceration.
Do scaredy-cat Republicans not like her because they’re actually afraid of minorities? Or are they just pushing the anti-minority white identity politics because that’s the only political play in their playbook?
Good for Arlington. Dems are putting their money where their mouth is: white and black people came together to fight racism.
48 percent of voters in a Democratic primary voted for Theo. Not sure why you’re ranting about Republicans. There really aren’t any in Arlington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hasn't Parisa never been in a courtroom?
Theo did some f'd up things so she deserved to be ousted, but kind of scared of Parisa's glazed over eyes SJW free-for-all mindset.
Parisa has never prosecuted a case, but she’s been in plenty or courtrooms. Prosecuting a case isn’t rocket science, and most cases plead out anyway. She’s a really talented lawyer, so i’m Guessing she can figure out how to do a direct, a plea colloquy, and a sentencing hearing. Not that the person who runs the office should be doing many of those.
Being an innocence lawyer involves investigating whether the claims are BS and, if not, developing facts to prove it. You have to think through how they’ll be in court, whether their testimony will be admissible, whether you can corroborate their story, and whether they’ll appear credible. All of those things are transferable skills and things many of us in the defense community would love to see prosecutors do more of (especially the corroborating).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hasn't Parisa never been in a courtroom?
Theo did some f'd up things so she deserved to be ousted, but kind of scared of Parisa's glazed over eyes SJW free-for-all mindset.
Parisa has never prosecuted a case, but she’s been in plenty or courtrooms. Prosecuting a case isn’t rocket science, and most cases plead out anyway. She’s a really talented lawyer, so i’m Guessing she can figure out how to do a direct, a plea colloquy, and a sentencing hearing. Not that the person who runs the office should be doing many of those.
Being an innocence lawyer involves investigating whether the claims are BS and, if not, developing facts to prove it. You have to think through how they’ll be in court, whether their testimony will be admissible, whether you can corroborate their story, and whether they’ll appear credible. All of those things are transferable skills and things many of us in the defense community would love to see prosecutors do more of (especially the corroborating).
Anonymous wrote:Hasn't Parisa never been in a courtroom?
Theo did some f'd up things so she deserved to be ousted, but kind of scared of Parisa's glazed over eyes SJW free-for-all mindset.
Anonymous wrote:Dear Arlington,
Thanks for taking all our criminals!
- Montgomery county
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, this might be good for the people priced out of Arlington. Crime goes up, real estate values come down.
Just the opposite. Yorktown parents won’t have to pay lawyers to get pot possession records expunged. More money to spend on housing.
Anonymous wrote:I know and like both Parisa and Theo. They are both lovely people who have very different visions of what prosecution should look like. On a whole lot of issues (discovery, mental health, juveniles), Theo champions tactics that are regressive, ineffective, and a poor use of resources. Those things are real, and they matter for a whole lot of people. I get that Arlington is Arlington, but people are nuts if they think those regressive policies don’t harm real people who are not true dangers to the community.
Anonymous wrote:I know and like both Parisa and Theo. They are both lovely people who have very different visions of what prosecution should look like. On a whole lot of issues (discovery, mental health, juveniles), Theo champions tactics that are regressive, ineffective, and a poor use of resources. Those things are real, and they matter for a whole lot of people. I get that Arlington is Arlington, but people are nuts if they think those regressive policies don’t harm real people who are not true dangers to the community.