Anonymous wrote:I agree let's wait for more details. We have no idea of the size and weight of this kid versus the para or aide who could have been a tiny woman. Let's be honest kids are no longer "regular" size anymore. You have more than half of the American population overweight....throw in height and it could be a nightmare situation for all involved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree let's wait for more details. We have no idea of the size and weight of this kid versus the para or aide who could have been a tiny woman. Let's be honest kids are no longer "regular" size anymore. You have more than half of the American population overweight....throw in height and it could be a nightmare situation for all involved.
Or maybe the kid was an amateur award winning boxer... Or maybe the bus driver was in a wheelchair...![]()
Stop trying to invent excuses and blame the victim and recognize that MCPS has room to improve how it supports kids with special needs.
Anonymous wrote:I agree let's wait for more details. We have no idea of the size and weight of this kid versus the para or aide who could have been a tiny woman. Let's be honest kids are no longer "regular" size anymore. You have more than half of the American population overweight....throw in height and it could be a nightmare situation for all involved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was not restrained because of his disability. He was restrained because of his actions on the bus.
The child is autistic. His actions were consistent with the type of disability he has.
Anyone trained in Special Education would know that yelling at a child having a meltdown would make the child’s behavior worse. There should have been 2 professionals on the bus - the bus driver and a paraeducator. The paraeducator is there to meet the child’s needs while the driver drives the bus. The paraeducator should have been the one figuring out what the child was trying to communicate.
Anonymous wrote:I have worked with younger students who have Autism and who are non-verbal. Unless you have seen the tantrums that children with that combination can have, you may not understand what an intense, scary situation it presents. It is much, much different than a typical child having a tantrum! I cannot imagine trying to deal with a high school age child, on a bus, who is raging; it would pose a safety issue for everyone on that bus!
Every special ed teacher or paraeducator I know (and I know dozens) has been bitten, kicked, punched, hit, slapped, or knocked down by a student. Often, they end up having to have physical therapy for injuries -- and I am talking about injuries caused by elementary-age students! The ones who have worked with middle and high school students always have scars and can tell you stories that will make you wonder how they can continue going to work every day. Dealing with special ed students is not an easy job! It is dangerous! And despite any training one can be given, it will always be dangerous!
I think before you all make judgements, you should wait for the facts of the case to come out and not be so quick to assume wrongdoing. Unless you have been in a similar situation, you have NO IDEA of how you would react!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was not restrained because of his disability. He was restrained because of his actions on the bus.
The child is autistic. His actions were consistent with the type of disability he has.
Anyone trained in Special Education would know that yelling at a child having a meltdown would make the child’s behavior worse. There should have been 2 professionals on the bus - the bus driver and a paraeducator. The paraeducator is there to meet the child’s needs while the driver drives the bus. The paraeducator should have been the one figuring out what the child was trying to communicate.
Anonymous wrote:He was not restrained because of his disability. He was restrained because of his actions on the bus.
Anonymous wrote:He was not restrained because of his disability. He was restrained because of his actions on the bus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if the kid was actually going to hurt the supervising and driving adults - what should they do? Just because he has autism does not mean he was not also acting in a dangerous or threatening manner.
+1.
OP is a loonie.
It's spelled looney, you ignoramus. Sorry you don't feel children with special needs have the right to be treated with dignity and served by trained professionals. Perhaps you should take your highly educated comment to Bethesda Magazine which reported on this concerning incident.
https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/schools/mother-says-autistic-son-was-restrained-put-in-handcuffs-after-episode-on-school-bus/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if the kid was actually going to hurt the supervising and driving adults - what should they do? Just because he has autism does not mean he was not also acting in a dangerous or threatening manner.
+1.
OP is a loonie.