Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.
It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!
I disagree. Kate looks regal. This woman looks like she walked in from Forever 21.
Regal yes, but I love the way Kate dresses, and that's among the worst dresses I've ever seen her wear. I can only think it's a protest dress against having to be seen with Donald Trump (who said she deserved it when the paparazzi snapped photos of her sunbathing topless in her private rental home in France.
Nope. Ugly is standard for Kate and this dress is far from the worst she’s worn to a state banquet.
![]()
I hated that blue state banquet dress too, but the one from today is far worse.
She looks so old.
Be nice. She had three kids. Be nice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.
Bad hair, sad little tits, and a pinched face. Is that the look now?
The draping fails to create the appearance of a waist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guy here. Kate looks amazing. That other chick looks sleazy
Sleezy works for mistresses world-wide. Camilla didn't get where she is by being prudish. Phone sex was the name of the game in the 90s.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.
Bad hair, sad little tits, and a pinched face. Is that the look now?
Anonymous wrote:Guy here. Kate looks amazing. That other chick looks sleazy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.
It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!
I disagree. Kate looks regal. This woman looks like she walked in from Forever 21.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.
It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!
The Kate halter is back. Must have killed you to go so long w/o posting.
Are you a bot? You keep saying the same thing over and over, while people tell you that hating Kate's dress does not equal hating Kate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.
Bad hair, sad little tits, and a pinched face. Is that the look now?

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.
It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!
The Kate halter is back. Must have killed you to go so long w/o posting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.
It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!
Anonymous wrote:
HEADS UP, IT'S THE ANTI-KATE TROLL AGAIN POSTING AS DIFFERENT PEOPLE.
Anonymous wrote:
HEADS UP, IT'S THE ANTI-KATE TROLL AGAIN POSTING AS DIFFERENT PEOPLE.