Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bethesda is over-rated. It is more than a status symbol than anything. Rush, FC Bordeaux, and MSI (depending on age group) offer more than Bethesda does. Hell, Bethesda realized that its u14/rising u14 sucked so it brought over the Rush coach and his players to take over the top team. I understand that barely five girls from the original Bethesda ECNL team were offered spots. That says a great deal about how weak the development is at Bethesda. Compare Bethesda to Mclean, FCV, Pipeline and youwill see that Bethesda is now a 2nd tier club.
A lot of that can be blamed on the TD for the u9-u12 group over the past few years. Her results were very poor, big time yeller and kids left. The 08’s(u11rising u12) are in the same boat with poor result and only had two teams in the age group. You need a larger pool players at that age group or you will have to seek players from outside the club. I know BSC was activity recruiting in that age group. Anyone know how the tryouts went? Did they have a good showing with new players?
I think the clubs on the girls side was/is suffering a malaise. The upper management not really paying attention to what was happening in the lower age groups and just relying on the rep of two good class years who are now aging out. The boys side seems strong. I heard they have changed up a few coaches and staff on the girls side. Can anyone talk about the new director and new coaches?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NCSL and CCL are good developmental leagues but aren't very competitive. EDP is the best non-ECNL/DA league and I would argue that the top half of the EDP's top divisions are as strong or stronger than the top local ECNL/DA teams.
Boys or girls? Age? It matters for any of the comparisons above. You can say that the top half of EDP is better than ECNL or DA, but it’s just words and bias. You have no idea. But it’s clear that there are one or two EDP lovers on this forum, that’s not in question.
What bias?! You sound like one of those parents that have bought into the "DA/ECNL is the end-all-be-all and all other leagues are not worthy." We are talking about girls soccer. and there are EDP teams and former EDP teams that are stronger than the local ECNL/DA teams. That is not bias. That is fact. Bethesda just brought over Rush's entire team to replace its existing ECNL team. Pipeline has nationally ranked teams at several age groups. There are EDP teams in NJ that can dominate any non-PDA ECNL team. Who is the one with the bias. Hi Pot, please meet kettle.
The point here is that EDP has some very competitive divisions and is much stronger than NCSL or CCL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bethesda is over-rated. It is more than a status symbol than anything. Rush, FC Bordeaux, and MSI (depending on age group) offer more than Bethesda does. Hell, Bethesda realized that its u14/rising u14 sucked so it brought over the Rush coach and his players to take over the top team. I understand that barely five girls from the original Bethesda ECNL team were offered spots. That says a great deal about how weak the development is at Bethesda. Compare Bethesda to Mclean, FCV, Pipeline and youwill see that Bethesda is now a 2nd tier club.
A lot of that can be blamed on the TD for the u9-u12 group over the past few years. Her results were very poor, big time yeller and kids left. The 08’s(u11rising u12) are in the same boat with poor result and only had two teams in the age group. You need a larger pool players at that age group or you will have to seek players from outside the club. I know BSC was activity recruiting in that age group. Anyone know how the tryouts went? Did they have a good showing with new players?
I think the clubs on the girls side was/is suffering a malaise. The upper management not really paying attention to what was happening in the lower age groups and just relying on the rep of two good class years who are now aging out. The boys side seems strong. I heard they have changed up a few coaches and staff on the girls side. Can anyone talk about the new director and new coaches?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NCSL and CCL are good developmental leagues but aren't very competitive. EDP is the best non-ECNL/DA league and I would argue that the top half of the EDP's top divisions are as strong or stronger than the top local ECNL/DA teams.
Boys or girls? Age? It matters for any of the comparisons above. You can say that the top half of EDP is better than ECNL or DA, but it’s just words and bias. You have no idea. But it’s clear that there are one or two EDP lovers on this forum, that’s not in question.
What bias?! You sound like one of those parents that have bought into the "DA/ECNL is the end-all-be-all and all other leagues are not worthy." We are talking about girls soccer. and there are EDP teams and former EDP teams that are stronger than the local ECNL/DA teams. That is not bias. That is fact. Bethesda just brought over Rush's entire team to replace its existing ECNL team. Pipeline has nationally ranked teams at several age groups. There are EDP teams in NJ that can dominate any non-PDA ECNL team. Who is the one with the bias. Hi Pot, please meet kettle.
The point here is that EDP has some very competitive divisions and is much stronger than NCSL or CCL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NCSL and CCL are good developmental leagues but aren't very competitive. EDP is the best non-ECNL/DA league and I would argue that the top half of the EDP's top divisions are as strong or stronger than the top local ECNL/DA teams.
Boys or girls? Age? It matters for any of the comparisons above. You can say that the top half of EDP is better than ECNL or DA, but it’s just words and bias. You have no idea. But it’s clear that there are one or two EDP lovers on this forum, that’s not in question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So how does it work? Is a ECNL/DA a first string or A team in a club, EDP a second or B team and CCL/NSCl third tier or C team? Is that correct or are their levels within each division?
Some clubs may do that, others may just do CCL for their next one or two teams (more common in VA), others EDP (more common in MD/northeast), some NPL/VPL (VA), then NCSL and finally ODSL. The difference between the leagues in terms of quality of play is really dependent on the specific gender, age group, and division. Even though for a given club and age group you may be able to say, for example:
DA > CCL1 > CCL2 > NCSL > ODSL
or
ECNL > EDP/NPL > NCSL > ODSL
You can’t generalize across the entire set of clubs, genders, or age groups. Different clubs have different league affiliations and different reasons for those affiliations. Larger clubs like CCL because they streamline scheduling their teams against other clubs teams, for example.
I’d suggest looking at the team in terms of training, level of play, and training environment as a main factor in selecting a suitable team for a DC, not the league the team plays in. It’s more important to find the right environment for your DC to grow as a player than to boast about x or y league that they play in. If the environment is right and the level of play on the team is good, your club will find the right opportunities to compete against teams in an appropriate venue.
Anonymous wrote:Bethesda is over-rated. It is more than a status symbol than anything. Rush, FC Bordeaux, and MSI (depending on age group) offer more than Bethesda does. Hell, Bethesda realized that its u14/rising u14 sucked so it brought over the Rush coach and his players to take over the top team. I understand that barely five girls from the original Bethesda ECNL team were offered spots. That says a great deal about how weak the development is at Bethesda. Compare Bethesda to Mclean, FCV, Pipeline and youwill see that Bethesda is now a 2nd tier club.
Anonymous wrote:So how does it work? Is a ECNL/DA a first string or A team in a club, EDP a second or B team and CCL/NSCl third tier or C team? Is that correct or are their levels within each division?
Anonymous wrote:NCSL and CCL are good developmental leagues but aren't very competitive. EDP is the best non-ECNL/DA league and I would argue that the top half of the EDP's top divisions are as strong or stronger than the top local ECNL/DA teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not OP, but can I ask another question?
My kid tried out for a couple of teams mentioned here, one team we tried out for plays EDP, one plays NCSL. Is one better than the other, or there just happen to be two (or more?) travel leagues in Maryland...?
In my opinion, the order is as follow:
NCSL
CCL
EDP
ECNL / DA
Many argue that CCL is not better than NCSL. I can’t say for sure one way or another but I know that CCL is more of a VA based league and travel games can be anywhere from VA Beach/Roanoke to Northern Baltimore.
Yes.
You are ranking worse on top yeah?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not OP, but can I ask another question?
My kid tried out for a couple of teams mentioned here, one team we tried out for plays EDP, one plays NCSL. Is one better than the other, or there just happen to be two (or more?) travel leagues in Maryland...?
EDP is the far superior league over NCSL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not OP, but can I ask another question?
My kid tried out for a couple of teams mentioned here, one team we tried out for plays EDP, one plays NCSL. Is one better than the other, or there just happen to be two (or more?) travel leagues in Maryland...?
In my opinion, the order is as follow:
NCSL
CCL
EDP
ECNL / DA
Many argue that CCL is not better than NCSL. I can’t say for sure one way or another but I know that CCL is more of a VA based league and travel games can be anywhere from VA Beach/Roanoke to Northern Baltimore.