Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m disappointed but we have already decided to move clubs anyway. My son has no idea he was put on a lower team and since we won’t be back I don’t want to tell him. My concern right now is that he’s playing in a tournament this weekend and all the parents will ask me where he placed. I don’t want to say. Please tell me how I can avoid this question. What can I say?
It was his failure, not yours. If asked, be honest.
Just say we never looked at our offer we knew we are moving to a new club
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m disappointed but we have already decided to move clubs anyway. My son has no idea he was put on a lower team and since we won’t be back I don’t want to tell him. My concern right now is that he’s playing in a tournament this weekend and all the parents will ask me where he placed. I don’t want to say. Please tell me how I can avoid this question. What can I say?
It was his failure, not yours. If asked, be honest.
Anonymous wrote:I’m disappointed but we have already decided to move clubs anyway. My son has no idea he was put on a lower team and since we won’t be back I don’t want to tell him. My concern right now is that he’s playing in a tournament this weekend and all the parents will ask me where he placed. I don’t want to say. Please tell me how I can avoid this question. What can I say?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is 'aggression' the key metric in evaluating a player? Only in garbage US soccer leagues and clubs.
Right, because you see lots of great athletes in any sport that aren't aggressive.
Troll somewhere else please.
DC’s coach said s/he didn’t make the top team because s/he wasn’t aggressive enough on 50-50 balls. Maybe there were other things but that’s what was communicated to us.
At least the coach told you something constructive. Many don’t even provide that courtesy. If you believe the coach is right in their assessment, talk to your kid about it. If they agree ask them why? Is it physical fear, fear of failure, or laziness? Fear of failure can be over come. Laziness is a matter of desire and that may indicate that for now they actually do belong on a less competitive team. Physical contact fear can also be overcome, although it is a little bit harder and teaching proper tackling techniques can help.
OP of the above post. I agree, coach showed class in communicating what DC needs to work on. Now it's on to the conversation with DC about the fact that soccer is intense and personal - you're 1v1 most of the game. Just not sure that's his/her cup of tea personality-wise.
Anonymous wrote:13:55 - that's kind of crappy. My daughter got cut from Travel entirely with two games left in the season. She was devastated, being the only one who was cut from her team, while many girls were moving up or staying.
We debated missing the last two games (especially since she was then stuck having two games AND tryouts for another team on one of the game days) but we decided to show. She got a ton of playing time and actually did really well, and I told myself, hey, maybe they'll regret not choosing her now. And we felt like we'd at least kept our commitment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is 'aggression' the key metric in evaluating a player? Only in garbage US soccer leagues and clubs.
Right, because you see lots of great athletes in any sport that aren't aggressive.
Troll somewhere else please.
DC’s coach said s/he didn’t make the top team because s/he wasn’t aggressive enough on 50-50 balls. Maybe there were other things but that’s what was communicated to us.
At least the coach told you something constructive. Many don’t even provide that courtesy. If you believe the coach is right in their assessment, talk to your kid about it. If they agree ask them why? Is it physical fear, fear of failure, or laziness? Fear of failure can be over come. Laziness is a matter of desire and that may indicate that for now they actually do belong on a less competitive team. Physical contact fear can also be overcome, although it is a little bit harder and teaching proper tackling techniques can help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is 'aggression' the key metric in evaluating a player? Only in garbage US soccer leagues and clubs.
Right, because you see lots of great athletes in any sport that aren't aggressive.
Troll somewhere else please.
DC’s coach said s/he didn’t make the top team because s/he wasn’t aggressive enough on 50-50 balls. Maybe there were other things but that’s what was communicated to us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is 'aggression' the key metric in evaluating a player? Only in garbage US soccer leagues and clubs.
Right, because you see lots of great athletes in any sport that aren't aggressive.
Troll somewhere else please.
DC’s coach said s/he didn’t make the top team because s/he wasn’t aggressive enough on 50-50 balls. Maybe there were other things but that’s what was communicated to us.
You need to win back the ball as quickly as possible and you need to step up to the ball, not wait for the pass to come to your feet.
That would be a legitimate issue.
My kid left and found a better environment and had renewed confidence and looked like a completely different player on the field. Sometimes change is needed. It’s not always a parent upset or angry. Sometimes they kid just no longer plays with heart with the “same old, same old” at a Club they stuck with for awhile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is 'aggression' the key metric in evaluating a player? Only in garbage US soccer leagues and clubs.
Right, because you see lots of great athletes in any sport that aren't aggressive.
Troll somewhere else please.
DC’s coach said s/he didn’t make the top team because s/he wasn’t aggressive enough on 50-50 balls. Maybe there were other things but that’s what was communicated to us.