Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm with Georgetown here. I also hope Georgetown and other universities find a way to rescind or revoke the diplomas of those who graduated before the scandal broke. It doesn't matter if they successfully completed their classes or not; their admission was still fraudulent. Students are legally responsible for the accuracy of their applications and cannot disclaim knowledge of the fraudulent schemes.
I don’t get this logic at all. Isn’t the actual work more important than how one got in? I made up an overseas high school when I never attended high school (grew up in a cult that didn’t believe in education beyond middle school). I graduated with a 3.9 GPA while fully supporting myself. I realize this is different than the privileged circumstances we’re discussing here, but I still think the kids should get credit for their work. I think it’s reasonable for colleges to expel them on a case by case basis but not to strip them of degrees or credits they’ve earned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm with Georgetown here. I also hope Georgetown and other universities find a way to rescind or revoke the diplomas of those who graduated before the scandal broke. It doesn't matter if they successfully completed their classes or not; their admission was still fraudulent. Students are legally responsible for the accuracy of their applications and cannot disclaim knowledge of the fraudulent schemes.
I don’t get this logic at all. Isn’t the actual work more important than how one got in? I made up an overseas high school when I never attended high school (grew up in a cult that didn’t believe in education beyond middle school). I graduated with a 3.9 GPA while fully supporting myself. I realize this is different than the privileged circumstances we’re discussing here, but I still think the kids should get credit for their work. I think it’s reasonable for colleges to expel them on a case by case basis but not to strip them of degrees or credits they’ve earned.
Anonymous wrote:I'm with Georgetown here. I also hope Georgetown and other universities find a way to rescind or revoke the diplomas of those who graduated before the scandal broke. It doesn't matter if they successfully completed their classes or not; their admission was still fraudulent. Students are legally responsible for the accuracy of their applications and cannot disclaim knowledge of the fraudulent schemes.
Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when the system doesn't treat everyone fairly and is not transparent. When people perceive that others are being held to a different standard and information is not readily available at a granular level to let parents decide whether or not a child really has a good chance to get in, parents get desperate and do crazy things. I come from a country with rampant corruption and the reason this country is so corrupt is because the elites have set up a system that encourages cheating and fraudulent activity. The people in the system just react to incentives.
The real culprits here are neither the parents nor the kids. It is the colleges. They participate in this system where information that really matters is hard to obtain and hidden in "aggregated useless statistics" and then they make the admission process a mystery and aren't really transparent about what goes on in the admission meetings.
Parents and kids are just trying to survive in this system.
Its like blaming the woman for prostituting herself, when she is trying to feed herself by selling her body because the market is setup that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that it's the university's fault because it should have known that he was lying on his application? That's ridiculous. And this isn't a life sentence--he's not going to prison, he's being kicked out of school. Which he deserves. He should get the credits for the classes he took, but otherwise, I'm not sympathetic. If he has a hard time getting admitted into another school because he's a liar--well, maybe he shouldn't have lied. People talk about how poor people need to learn to take responsibility for their choices, well, so do rich people, right?
Agreed. The kid is suing because he knows he's not going to be able to transfer to a Georgetown caliber school (with a 3.1 GPA), and he's making a Hail Mary lawsuit pass.
+1 to PP. if this student were a freshman and not a junior with just a year of undergrad left, it might be less likely that he would sue, I think. But he's got three years in, and wants that Georgetown name on the degree. I'm not sure what that will gain for him, if he wins, because the most basic Googke search will turn up the fraud allegation with his name attached--for the rest of his life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought the article said he was told the tennis coach was going to write a recommendation for him? That's different than if he was told the coach was going to pretend he's a recruit. If the student met the coach a couple time and the coach wrote a recommendation it would be using a connections, but not illegal. If that's all that was disclosed to the student, he shouldn't be published. Redoing three years of undergrad is brutal.
punished
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that it's the university's fault because it should have known that he was lying on his application? That's ridiculous. And this isn't a life sentence--he's not going to prison, he's being kicked out of school. Which he deserves. He should get the credits for the classes he took, but otherwise, I'm not sympathetic. If he has a hard time getting admitted into another school because he's a liar--well, maybe he shouldn't have lied. People talk about how poor people need to learn to take responsibility for their choices, well, so do rich people, right?
Agreed. The kid is suing because he knows he's not going to be able to transfer to a Georgetown caliber school (with a 3.1 GPA), and he's making a Hail Mary lawsuit pass.
Anonymous wrote:I thought the article said he was told the tennis coach was going to write a recommendation for him? That's different than if he was told the coach was going to pretend he's a recruit. If the student met the coach a couple time and the coach wrote a recommendation it would be using a connections, but not illegal. If that's all that was disclosed to the student, he shouldn't be published. Redoing three years of undergrad is brutal.
Anonymous wrote:Oh FFS.
He knew he was admitted fraud.
His defense is: you should have stopped me from doing illegal things earlier
Having to transfer isn’t a life sentence. And it will only follow him because he committed a crime and then filed a lawsuit and went public.
And 3.18 isn’t really “good grades”.
Anonymous wrote:Oh FFS.
He knew he was admitted fraud.
His defense is: you should have stopped me from doing illegal things earlier
Having to transfer isn’t a life sentence. And it will only follow him because he committed a crime and then filed a lawsuit and went public.
And 3.18 isn’t really “good grades”.