Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think there is any question. Univ of Chicago is now $76,000 a year. UVA instate's tuition is $14,710. (our DS lives off campus so doesn't have dorm, food service, health service fees). He has no car so only expenses are shared apartment and food. Our total outlay was probably $22K this year. Even using UVA's cost calculator for a student living on campus at $32,000, you are still looking at a difference of $44K a year which is in after-tax dollars. We would have to make $70K to pay the difference. Multiply that by four or five years and you have enough to pay for grad school, which is exactly what we are doing. Go to UVA and bank the difference, if you have it. If you don't have it, you should be going to UVA anyhow. DS has had a wonderful four years. Chicago is full of smart kids but it is cold and dark and fun indeed goes there to die.
No, absolutely not. Nobody should pay to go to grad school (professional school like law and medicine are the exception).
Grad students should be offered a teaching or research assistantship which comes with tuition waiver. If you are paying for it, they don't really want you and don't think you will succeed, and they are probably right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My step-S who got kicked out of his HS received his complimentary promotional material from Chicago. Bizarre college. Or a desperate one.
Haha, as if Chicago has any reason to be desperate.
I had a choice between in state at IL or Chicago (with loans). I went to Chicago and it has and still makes a difference.
uva isn't il. the ROI difference between uva and chicago is only $5000 more per year.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think there is any question. Univ of Chicago is now $76,000 a year. UVA instate's tuition is $14,710. (our DS lives off campus so doesn't have dorm, food service, health service fees). He has no car so only expenses are shared apartment and food. Our total outlay was probably $22K this year. Even using UVA's cost calculator for a student living on campus at $32,000, you are still looking at a difference of $44K a year which is in after-tax dollars. We would have to make $70K to pay the difference. Multiply that by four or five years and you have enough to pay for grad school, which is exactly what we are doing. Go to UVA and bank the difference, if you have it. If you don't have it, you should be going to UVA anyhow. DS has had a wonderful four years. Chicago is full of smart kids but it is cold and dark and fun indeed goes there to die.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ask yourself if the extra debt is worth it. Will it matter when he is 40, will his friends and family care which school he went to 20 years prior.
Well, for my family it very much did matter at 40.
If I hadn't gotten the undergraduate education I did, I wouldn't have gotten into the grad program I got into and my career would have turned out quite differently.
Same story for my husband.
We both have elite undergrads (me Ivy, him equivalent abroad) and top ten in our field PhDs.
I'm curious, how do you know you wouldn't have gotten into the grad program you did?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ask yourself if the extra debt is worth it. Will it matter when he is 40, will his friends and family care which school he went to 20 years prior.
Well, for my family it very much did matter at 40.
If I hadn't gotten the undergraduate education I did, I wouldn't have gotten into the grad program I got into and my career would have turned out quite differently.
Same story for my husband.
We both have elite undergrads (me Ivy, him equivalent abroad) and top ten in our field PhDs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My step-S who got kicked out of his HS received his complimentary promotional material from Chicago. Bizarre college. Or a desperate one.
Haha, as if Chicago has any reason to be desperate.
I had a choice between in state at IL or Chicago (with loans). I went to Chicago and it has and still makes a difference.
uva isn't il. the ROI difference between uva and chicago is only $5000 more per year.
well, if that's how you measure quality of school, how about GMU and UVa? Are they equals?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't seem to be very similar schools to me. That might make it easier. Public vs. private. College town vs large city. ACC vs Division III. Intellectual vs more all rounded.
Chicago is now lumped in with the Ivy+ schools. Ivy + MIT, Stanford, Duke, Chicago, etc. UVA is not. That said, I don't know that they outcomes would really be that different.
No. Chicago is with state universities in terms of college outcomes.
Anonymous wrote:Is private Chicago worth the premium?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't seem to be very similar schools to me. That might make it easier. Public vs. private. College town vs large city. ACC vs Division III. Intellectual vs more all rounded.
Chicago is now lumped in with the Ivy+ schools. Ivy + MIT, Stanford, Duke, Chicago, etc. UVA is not. That said, I don't know that they outcomes would really be that different.
No. Chicago is with state universities in terms of college outcomes.
Anonymous wrote:They don't seem to be very similar schools to me. That might make it easier. Public vs. private. College town vs large city. ACC vs Division III. Intellectual vs more all rounded.
Chicago is now lumped in with the Ivy+ schools. Ivy + MIT, Stanford, Duke, Chicago, etc. UVA is not. That said, I don't know that they outcomes would really be that different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My step-S who got kicked out of his HS received his complimentary promotional material from Chicago. Bizarre college. Or a desperate one.
Haha, as if Chicago has any reason to be desperate.
I had a choice between in state at IL or Chicago (with loans). I went to Chicago and it has and still makes a difference.
uva isn't il. the ROI difference between uva and chicago is only $5000 more per year.