Hmm, is he trying to hide something?

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/04/29/donald-trump-sues-deutsche-bank-capital-one-block-subpoenas/3624327002/

Anonymous wrote:NY Times:

The president, his kids and the Trump Org sue Deustsche Bank and Capital One to prevent them from responding to congressional subpoenas, according to papers filed today.


******


These are the actions of innocent people.


(not)

What's he hiding?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/441281-read-the-trump-family-trump-organizations-lawsuit-against-deutsche

President Trump, members of his family and his private businesses filed a federal lawsuit late Monday against Deutsche Bank and Capital One in an attempt to block the financial institutions from complying with congressional subpoenas.

The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of New York, comes after House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) issued the subpoenas seeking records on Trump's personal finances.

Read the entirety of the lawsuit here:
https://www.scribd.com/document/408116404/Trump-et-al-v-Deutsche-Bank-et-al#from_embed

NY Times:

The president, his kids and the Trump Org sue Deustsche Bank and Capital One to prevent them from responding to congressional subpoenas, according to papers filed today.


******


These are the actions of innocent people.


(not)

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/24/politics/deutsche-bank-trump-records/index.html

Deutsche Bank has begun the process of providing financial records to New York state's attorney general in response to a subpoena for documents related to loans made to President Donald Trump and his business, according to a person familiar with the production.

Last month, the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James issued subpoenas for records tied to funding for several Trump Organization projects.

The state's top legal officer opened a civil probe after Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen testified to Congress in a public hearing that Trump had inflated his assets. Cohen at that time presented copies of financial statements he said had been provided to Deutsche Bank.

Awesome! But I also hear that Barr is taking charge of SDNY. I wonder if he can coverup this investigation too.

Barr can’t do anything with a NYAG investigation. He can’t do a lot with SDNY either.

The Trump children will be in jail, put there by NYAG, and their father will follow as soon as he is out of office.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there ever a moment when you all sit back and think that using criminal prosecutions to hound political opponents is a terrible thing to do? Or just nah, because you lack the ability to think long term.

Well mercy me. Obviously it's not a terrible thing to do when the politicians in question are criminals. Why should they be let off the hook for their criminal behavior?

p.s. the people who can't think long term are those who aren't doing anything now to save the environment for our descendents, because they're too focused on their life here and now. Just sayin'

It’s remarkable how all of you are able to somehow determine—without any investigation evidence—that Donald Trump is a criminal. You’re the worst, most destructive kind of partisans. Blinded by your rage. Unable to conceive of any good that doesn’t involve advancing your party. Utterly brainless.

Have you READ The Mueller Report? No? Didn't think so. Bet you've never read anything longer than four pages. What's remarkable is how daft you Trumpsters are.

Remind me...did the Mueller report conclude that Donald Trump committee any crimes? Oh, what's that? It didn't? Well, that's very interesting. And, you know what, that part about "not exonerating" the president is irrelevant. Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people. They decide whether or not to charge them based on the evidence, and here, it appears that the Mueller team didn't think it had the evidence to recommend charges.

Again, you and your compatriots need to stop. You are harmful to this country.

Yes, it actually did. You clearly have not read it.

No, it doesn’t say that Donald Trump committed crimes. You want it to say that, but it doesn’t.

Your lies are harming the country. You need to stop. Stop lying. Stop deceiving. Just stop.

Do not feed this stupid Trump Troll. Ignore, ignore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there ever a moment when you all sit back and think that using criminal prosecutions to hound political opponents is a terrible thing to do? Or just nah, because you lack the ability to think long term.

Well mercy me. Obviously it's not a terrible thing to do when the politicians in question are criminals. Why should they be let off the hook for their criminal behavior?

p.s. the people who can't think long term are those who aren't doing anything now to save the environment for our descendents, because they're too focused on their life here and now. Just sayin'

It’s remarkable how all of you are able to somehow determine—without any investigation evidence—that Donald Trump is a criminal. You’re the worst, most destructive kind of partisans. Blinded by your rage. Unable to conceive of any good that doesn’t involve advancing your party. Utterly brainless.

Have you READ The Mueller Report? No? Didn't think so. Bet you've never read anything longer than four pages. What's remarkable is how daft you Trumpsters are.

Remind me...did the Mueller report conclude that Donald Trump committee any crimes? Oh, what's that? It didn't? Well, that's very interesting. And, you know what, that part about "not exonerating" the president is irrelevant. Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people. They decide whether or not to charge them based on the evidence, and here, it appears that the Mueller team didn't think it had the evidence to recommend charges.

Again, you and your compatriots need to stop. You are harmful to this country.

What country are you from, Boris?

Anonymous wrote:"The walls are closing in" again...and again...and again...and again...

We thought Trump would be out of office by now, but he’s amazingly slippery, and his GOP enablers have been closing ranks and protecting him from prosecution for a while now.

Democrats are nicer than Republicans. They don’t fight as ferociously. They aren’t dirty hypocritical liars like the Republicans. Sure, there are some awful Democrats, but overall, they are kinder, gentler, more principled people who care about the poor and women and others traditionally left out of the power structure.

So, yeah, the walls have been closing in, but Dems lack the viciousness to crush Trump and his enablers, the GOP, so the walls are still standing, protecting that criminal.

The fight about subpoenas and witnesses between the House Democrats and the White House is astonishing, and might be the tipping point that pushes Democrats to fight harder and defeat the GOP and their Orange Putin. But maybe not. We’ll have to see if Nancy Pelosi can bite hard when the situation demands it, as it does today.

Anonymous wrote:Interesting fact: Bankers Trust had $100 million in unsecured debt during the 6 entity bankruptcies.

Another Interest fact: Bankers Trust was fully repaid this $100 million (plus interest) long before being bought by DB

IIRC at least some of those entities were public, TCHR, and Morgan Stanley bailed out some of the debt but not all. New Jersey taxpayers never got their share back either of the millions in tax incentives he stole. You actually think this makes him look good?

Interesting fact: Bankers Trust had $100 million in unsecured debt during the 6 entity bankruptcies.

Another Interest fact: Bankers Trust was fully repaid this $100 million (plus interest) long before being bought by DB

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there ever a moment when you all sit back and think that using criminal prosecutions to hound political opponents is a terrible thing to do? Or just nah, because you lack the ability to think long term.

Well mercy me. Obviously it's not a terrible thing to do when the politicians in question are criminals. Why should they be let off the hook for their criminal behavior?

p.s. the people who can't think long term are those who aren't doing anything now to save the environment for our descendents, because they're too focused on their life here and now. Just sayin'

It’s remarkable how all of you are able to somehow determine—without any investigation evidence—that Donald Trump is a criminal. You’re the worst, most destructive kind of partisans. Blinded by your rage. Unable to conceive of any good that doesn’t involve advancing your party. Utterly brainless.

Have you READ The Mueller Report? No? Didn't think so. Bet you've never read anything longer than four pages. What's remarkable is how daft you Trumpsters are.

Remind me...did the Mueller report conclude that Donald Trump committee any crimes? Oh, what's that? It didn't? Well, that's very interesting. And, you know what, that part about "not exonerating" the president is irrelevant. Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people. They decide whether or not to charge them based on the evidence, and here, it appears that the Mueller team didn't think it had the evidence to recommend charges.

Again, you and your compatriots need to stop. You are harmful to this country.

Yes, it actually did. You clearly have not read it.

No, it doesn’t say that Donald Trump committed crimes. You want it to say that, but it doesn’t.

Your lies are harming the country. You need to stop. Stop lying. Stop deceiving. Just stop.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there ever a moment when you all sit back and think that using criminal prosecutions to hound political opponents is a terrible thing to do? Or just nah, because you lack the ability to think long term.

Well mercy me. Obviously it's not a terrible thing to do when the politicians in question are criminals. Why should they be let off the hook for their criminal behavior?

p.s. the people who can't think long term are those who aren't doing anything now to save the environment for our descendents, because they're too focused on their life here and now. Just sayin'

It’s remarkable how all of you are able to somehow determine—without any investigation evidence—that Donald Trump is a criminal. You’re the worst, most destructive kind of partisans. Blinded by your rage. Unable to conceive of any good that doesn’t involve advancing your party. Utterly brainless.

Have you READ The Mueller Report? No? Didn't think so. Bet you've never read anything longer than four pages. What's remarkable is how daft you Trumpsters are.

Remind me...did the Mueller report conclude that Donald Trump committee any crimes? Oh, what's that? It didn't? Well, that's very interesting. And, you know what, that part about "not exonerating" the president is irrelevant. Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people. They decide whether or not to charge them based on the evidence, and here, it appears that the Mueller team didn't think it had the evidence to recommend charges.

Again, you and your compatriots need to stop. You are harmful to this country.

Yes, it actually did. You clearly have not read it.

No, it doesn’t say that Donald Trump committed crimes. You want it to say that, but it doesn’t.

How many pages did you read?

Don’t argue with the Russians. Seriously, have we not learned by now???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there ever a moment when you all sit back and think that using criminal prosecutions to hound political opponents is a terrible thing to do? Or just nah, because you lack the ability to think long term.

Well mercy me. Obviously it's not a terrible thing to do when the politicians in question are criminals. Why should they be let off the hook for their criminal behavior?

p.s. the people who can't think long term are those who aren't doing anything now to save the environment for our descendents, because they're too focused on their life here and now. Just sayin'

It’s remarkable how all of you are able to somehow determine—without any investigation evidence—that Donald Trump is a criminal. You’re the worst, most destructive kind of partisans. Blinded by your rage. Unable to conceive of any good that doesn’t involve advancing your party. Utterly brainless.

You’re projecting - again.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there ever a moment when you all sit back and think that using criminal prosecutions to hound political opponents is a terrible thing to do? Or just nah, because you lack the ability to think long term.

Well mercy me. Obviously it's not a terrible thing to do when the politicians in question are criminals. Why should they be let off the hook for their criminal behavior?

p.s. the people who can't think long term are those who aren't doing anything now to save the environment for our descendents, because they're too focused on their life here and now. Just sayin'

It’s remarkable how all of you are able to somehow determine—without any investigation evidence—that Donald Trump is a criminal. You’re the worst, most destructive kind of partisans. Blinded by your rage. Unable to conceive of any good that doesn’t involve advancing your party. Utterly brainless.

Have you READ The Mueller Report? No? Didn't think so. Bet you've never read anything longer than four pages. What's remarkable is how daft you Trumpsters are.

Remind me...did the Mueller report conclude that Donald Trump committee any crimes? Oh, what's that? It didn't? Well, that's very interesting. And, you know what, that part about "not exonerating" the president is irrelevant. Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people. They decide whether or not to charge them based on the evidence, and here, it appears that the Mueller team didn't think it had the evidence to recommend charges.

Again, you and your compatriots need to stop. You are harmful to this country.

Yes, it actually did. You clearly have not read it.

No, it doesn’t say that Donald Trump committed crimes. You want it to say that, but it doesn’t.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there ever a moment when you all sit back and think that using criminal prosecutions to hound political opponents is a terrible thing to do? Or just nah, because you lack the ability to think long term.

Well mercy me. Obviously it's not a terrible thing to do when the politicians in question are criminals. Why should they be let off the hook for their criminal behavior?

p.s. the people who can't think long term are those who aren't doing anything now to save the environment for our descendents, because they're too focused on their life here and now. Just sayin'

It’s remarkable how all of you are able to somehow determine—without any investigation evidence—that Donald Trump is a criminal. You’re the worst, most destructive kind of partisans. Blinded by your rage. Unable to conceive of any good that doesn’t involve advancing your party. Utterly brainless.

Have you READ The Mueller Report? No? Didn't think so. Bet you've never read anything longer than four pages. What's remarkable is how daft you Trumpsters are.

Remind me...did the Mueller report conclude that Donald Trump committee any crimes? Oh, what's that? It didn't? Well, that's very interesting. And, you know what, that part about "not exonerating" the president is irrelevant. Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people. They decide whether or not to charge them based on the evidence, and here, it appears that the Mueller team didn't think it had the evidence to recommend charges.

Again, you and your compatriots need to stop. You are harmful to this country.

Yes, it actually did. You clearly have not read it.