Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, its a fair question to ask. It’s pretty clear that DCPS is out of answers on how to make EOTP schools attractive. And it’s clear from the last go around that there is little appetite for city wide schools. So it’s possible another WOTP school gets sacrificed. And LaFayette makes the most sense geographically and has the scale to flip an EOTP MS overnight. In terms of Ward 3 LaFayette is a political powerhouse, but they are a drop in the bucket citywide. Especially for a mayor who may not run for a 3rd term to actually spend time with her new child.
Er, no. Geographically, Shepherd and Bancroft are significantly farther to Deal — by miles — than Lafayette.
I realize the political / optics considerations are different and subjective. But you can't make up your own facts to replace objective truths that can be measured and replicated with reliable instruments.
Removing Shepherd only cuts at most 50 kids. It is a tiny school.
So add up multiple, far-away schools that are much, much closer to another middle school. For example:
Of the 5th graders taking PARCC last year …
Shepherd (47) + Bancroft (72) > Lafayette (97)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, its a fair question to ask. It’s pretty clear that DCPS is out of answers on how to make EOTP schools attractive. And it’s clear from the last go around that there is little appetite for city wide schools. So it’s possible another WOTP school gets sacrificed. And LaFayette makes the most sense geographically and has the scale to flip an EOTP MS overnight. In terms of Ward 3 LaFayette is a political powerhouse, but they are a drop in the bucket citywide. Especially for a mayor who may not run for a 3rd term to actually spend time with her new child.
Er, no. Geographically, Shepherd and Bancroft are significantly farther to Deal — by miles — than Lafayette.
I realize the political / optics considerations are different and subjective. But you can't make up your own facts to replace objective truths that can be measured and replicated with reliable instruments.
Removing Shepherd only cuts at most 50 kids. It is a tiny school.
So add up multiple, far-away schools that are much, much closer to another middle school. For example:
Of the 5th graders taking PARCC last year …
Shepherd (47) + Bancroft (72) > Lafayette (97)
The doesn't tell you how many Bancroft students will opt for MacFarland to continue with dual language, and how many from any of these schools leave for privates or anything else.
0
I agree with this and iof the 97 from Lafayette I would think it was much more likely that more kids go private than those from Bancroft or Shepherd. CCDC is a much wealthier area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't have to choose among Shepherd, Lafayette, Bancroft, and Oyster. They should ALL have different feeder patterns: the former two to Wells and Coolidge and the latter two to MacFarland and Roosevelt.
Agree. If they move schools out of Deal-Wilson, it will be a bunch of schools so none of them can say they were targeted.
Bancroft is an obvious choice, since it's gerrymandered into the Deal-Wilson catchment and just really far from the schools. Bancroft and O-A go to the dual language high schools, because duh. It's a waste of money to not send them there.
Shepherd and Lafayette will both be re-assigned at the same time for the purposes of political optics/CYA. They can't remove a school with UMC children of color (Shepherd) without removing a school filled with UMC white kids (Lafayette). Both or none.
I don’t disagree but Crestwood was zoned out without a WOTP school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We don't have to choose among Shepherd, Lafayette, Bancroft, and Oyster. They should ALL have different feeder patterns: the former two to Wells and Coolidge and the latter two to MacFarland and Roosevelt.
Agree. If they move schools out of Deal-Wilson, it will be a bunch of schools so none of them can say they were targeted.
Bancroft is an obvious choice, since it's gerrymandered into the Deal-Wilson catchment and just really far from the schools. Bancroft and O-A go to the dual language high schools, because duh. It's a waste of money to not send them there.
Shepherd and Lafayette will both be re-assigned at the same time for the purposes of political optics/CYA. They can't remove a school with UMC children of color (Shepherd) without removing a school filled with UMC white kids (Lafayette). Both or none.
Anonymous wrote:We don't have to choose among Shepherd, Lafayette, Bancroft, and Oyster. They should ALL have different feeder patterns: the former two to Wells and Coolidge and the latter two to MacFarland and Roosevelt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, its a fair question to ask. It’s pretty clear that DCPS is out of answers on how to make EOTP schools attractive. And it’s clear from the last go around that there is little appetite for city wide schools. So it’s possible another WOTP school gets sacrificed. And LaFayette makes the most sense geographically and has the scale to flip an EOTP MS overnight. In terms of Ward 3 LaFayette is a political powerhouse, but they are a drop in the bucket citywide. Especially for a mayor who may not run for a 3rd term to actually spend time with her new child.
Er, no. Geographically, Shepherd and Bancroft are significantly farther to Deal — by miles — than Lafayette.
I realize the political / optics considerations are different and subjective. But you can't make up your own facts to replace objective truths that can be measured and replicated with reliable instruments.
Removing Shepherd only cuts at most 50 kids. It is a tiny school.
So add up multiple, far-away schools that are much, much closer to another middle school. For example:
Of the 5th graders taking PARCC last year …
Shepherd (47) + Bancroft (72) > Lafayette (97)
The doesn't tell you how many Bancroft students will opt for MacFarland to continue with dual language, and how many from any of these schools leave for privates or anything else.
0
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, its a fair question to ask. It’s pretty clear that DCPS is out of answers on how to make EOTP schools attractive. And it’s clear from the last go around that there is little appetite for city wide schools. So it’s possible another WOTP school gets sacrificed. And LaFayette makes the most sense geographically and has the scale to flip an EOTP MS overnight. In terms of Ward 3 LaFayette is a political powerhouse, but they are a drop in the bucket citywide. Especially for a mayor who may not run for a 3rd term to actually spend time with her new child.
Er, no. Geographically, Shepherd and Bancroft are significantly farther to Deal — by miles — than Lafayette.
I realize the political / optics considerations are different and subjective. But you can't make up your own facts to replace objective truths that can be measured and replicated with reliable instruments.
Removing Shepherd only cuts at most 50 kids. It is a tiny school.
So add up multiple, far-away schools that are much, much closer to another middle school. For example:
Of the 5th graders taking PARCC last year …
Shepherd (47) + Bancroft (72) > Lafayette (97)
The doesn't tell you how many Bancroft students will opt for MacFarland to continue with dual language, and how many from any of these schools leave for privates or anything else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, its a fair question to ask. It’s pretty clear that DCPS is out of answers on how to make EOTP schools attractive. And it’s clear from the last go around that there is little appetite for city wide schools. So it’s possible another WOTP school gets sacrificed. And LaFayette makes the most sense geographically and has the scale to flip an EOTP MS overnight. In terms of Ward 3 LaFayette is a political powerhouse, but they are a drop in the bucket citywide. Especially for a mayor who may not run for a 3rd term to actually spend time with her new child.
Er, no. Geographically, Shepherd and Bancroft are significantly farther to Deal — by miles — than Lafayette.
I realize the political / optics considerations are different and subjective. But you can't make up your own facts to replace objective truths that can be measured and replicated with reliable instruments.
Removing Shepherd only cuts at most 50 kids. It is a tiny school.
So add up multiple, far-away schools that are much, much closer to another middle school. For example:
Of the 5th graders taking PARCC last year …
Shepherd (47) + Bancroft (72) > Lafayette (97)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, its a fair question to ask. It’s pretty clear that DCPS is out of answers on how to make EOTP schools attractive. And it’s clear from the last go around that there is little appetite for city wide schools. So it’s possible another WOTP school gets sacrificed. And LaFayette makes the most sense geographically and has the scale to flip an EOTP MS overnight. In terms of Ward 3 LaFayette is a political powerhouse, but they are a drop in the bucket citywide. Especially for a mayor who may not run for a 3rd term to actually spend time with her new child.
Er, no. Geographically, Shepherd and Bancroft are significantly farther to Deal — by miles — than Lafayette.
I realize the political / optics considerations are different and subjective. But you can't make up your own facts to replace objective truths that can be measured and replicated with reliable instruments.
Removing Shepherd only cuts at most 50 kids. It is a tiny school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, its a fair question to ask. It’s pretty clear that DCPS is out of answers on how to make EOTP schools attractive. And it’s clear from the last go around that there is little appetite for city wide schools. So it’s possible another WOTP school gets sacrificed. And LaFayette makes the most sense geographically and has the scale to flip an EOTP MS overnight. In terms of Ward 3 LaFayette is a political powerhouse, but they are a drop in the bucket citywide. Especially for a mayor who may not run for a 3rd term to actually spend time with her new child.
Er, no. Geographically, Shepherd and Bancroft are significantly farther to Deal — by miles — than Lafayette.
I realize the political / optics considerations are different and subjective. But you can't make up your own facts to replace objective truths that can be measured and replicated with reliable instruments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, its a fair question to ask. It’s pretty clear that DCPS is out of answers on how to make EOTP schools attractive. And it’s clear from the last go around that there is little appetite for city wide schools. So it’s possible another WOTP school gets sacrificed. And LaFayette makes the most sense geographically and has the scale to flip an EOTP MS overnight. In terms of Ward 3 LaFayette is a political powerhouse, but they are a drop in the bucket citywide. Especially for a mayor who may not run for a 3rd term to actually spend time with her new child.
Er, no. Geographically, Shepherd and Bancroft are significantly farther to Deal — by miles — than Lafayette.
I realize the political / optics considerations are different and subjective. But you can't make up your own facts to replace objective truths that can be measured and replicated with reliable instruments.
Anonymous wrote:Sadly, its a fair question to ask. It’s pretty clear that DCPS is out of answers on how to make EOTP schools attractive. And it’s clear from the last go around that there is little appetite for city wide schools. So it’s possible another WOTP school gets sacrificed. And LaFayette makes the most sense geographically and has the scale to flip an EOTP MS overnight. In terms of Ward 3 LaFayette is a political powerhouse, but they are a drop in the bucket citywide. Especially for a mayor who may not run for a 3rd term to actually spend time with her new child.