Anonymous wrote:Because they can’t afford them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality new builds are great.
Here’s what’s not great:
-Foyers with stupid compass designs inlaid in the floor. I don’t care what direction North is, where is the bathroom? You’re not Christopher Columbus and the foyer isn’t setting out to discover new lands.
Lol. I haven't seen this before, is this a thing?
I think the PP is talking about something like this:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality new builds are great.
Here’s what’s not great:
-Foyers with stupid compass designs inlaid in the floor. I don’t care what direction North is, where is the bathroom? You’re not Christopher Columbus and the foyer isn’t setting out to discover new lands.
Lol. I haven't seen this before, is this a thing?

Anonymous wrote:I think its because the new builds are generally out in the suburbs. In DCUMland, suburbs are to be hated.
(I am in a far-flung exurb and LOVE my new build. And it is not "cookie-cutter" as people like to assume all new builds are).
Anonymous wrote:Because DCUM hates everything!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of them are cheaply and quickly built monstrosities? If you can afford a truly custom home - from the site work to the planning and design to the finishes - more power to you. But I was appalled at the sloppy site prep and poor quality of the new build neighborhoods we toured...not to mention the fact that they all seemed to prioritize square footage over livable design or *gasp* a yard...
+1 All the new builds I see look the same. Big, ugly McCraftsmans in the same shade of blue with the smallest possible lawn. It's like people who buy those homes fear greenery.
Honestly, all homes and condos look the same in this area. I always laugh when someone says "New homes look cookie cutter" cause most likely, your place is just as generic and cookie cutter. You either get
1) What you just described
2) Boring basic colonials with brick or vinyl siding
3) Post-WWII shitshacks/ramblers that have shitty HGTV styled flips
4) Boxy looking luxury condos/mixed use urban condos
Anonymous wrote:Quality new builds are great.
Here’s what’s not great:
-building right next to freeway entrance ramps, gas stations, medical clinics, etc.
-faux stone in front and siding wraparounds.
-Ornate columns that look picked off the set of a Monty Python film that you use to hold up your sheet metal pediment.
-Stupidly selected landscaping that looks terrible and will die soon (palm trees??? Really????).
-Giant trash castles that are finished in bargain-basement builders’ crap. The quantity over quality places.
-No yards because of monstrosity footprints. Who wants green space when you can breathe plastic composites and cement board fiber all day!?
-Inability to be harmonious with the surroundings. Your faux French castle might look good in France. It looks bad bad bad on a .25 acre lot next to WWI shacks.
-Foyers with stupid compass designs inlaid in the floor. I don’t care what direction North is, where is the bathroom? You’re not Christopher Columbus and the foyer isn’t setting out to discover new lands.
-Oddly shaped and dissimilar windows and dormers that look like they were all bought from different liquidation sales and stuck onto your house to be fancy.
-That disgusting chalk-colored pink brick that makes it look like your house is crying.
-Coffered ceilings in rooms where they don’t make sense.