Anonymous wrote:Everyone has to know their child and know what’s appropriate. I’m an adult adoptee. My adoption wasn’t traumatic at all for me and while I can objectively acknowledge there’s a loss of birth family and culture, I myself don’t see it as a loss and instead see how much I’ve gained. But there are other adoptees who feel entirely differently.
Anonymous wrote:does that really happen? Relinquishing a child for adoption is voluntaryAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Btw I have also heard of this day referred to as a “traumaversary”.
That's absurd.
No it isn't. The day my child came into my care was the day the police broke down a door and removed her and she saw her bio father arrested. And if you have ever heard a bio mother cry when parental rights are terminated.you would understand it is not something to celebrate.
Anonymous wrote:does that really happen? Relinquishing a child for adoption is voluntaryAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Btw I have also heard of this day referred to as a “traumaversary”.
That's absurd.
No it isn't. The day my child came into my care was the day the police broke down a door and removed her and she saw her bio father arrested. And if you have ever heard a bio mother cry when parental rights are terminated.you would understand it is not something to celebrate.
does that really happen? Relinquishing a child for adoption is voluntaryAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Btw I have also heard of this day referred to as a “traumaversary”.
That's absurd.
No it isn't. The day my child came into my care was the day the police broke down a door and removed her and she saw her bio father arrested. And if you have ever heard a bio mother cry when parental rights are terminated.you would understand it is not something to celebrate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone has to know their child and know what’s appropriate. I’m an adult adoptee. My adoption wasn’t traumatic at all for me and while I can objectively acknowledge there’s a loss of birth family and culture, I myself don’t see it as a loss and instead see how much I’ve gained. But there are other adoptees who feel entirely differently.
These are not mutually exclusive. My child is quite traumatized by loss and abandonment issues. Yet he knows objectively and in his heart that he has gained so much as a result of adoption and that, likely, his life is so much better in terms of comfort, security, love and financial matters.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone has to know their child and know what’s appropriate. I’m an adult adoptee. My adoption wasn’t traumatic at all for me and while I can objectively acknowledge there’s a loss of birth family and culture, I myself don’t see it as a loss and instead see how much I’ve gained. But there are other adoptees who feel entirely differently.
Anonymous wrote:No. I don't even have memorized the date she became legally ours. But adoption is born out of loss, always - the loss of a bond between a mother and her child. That's not something to celebrate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Btw I have also heard of this day referred to as a “traumaversary”.
That's absurd.
No it isn't. The day my child came into my care was the day the police broke down a door and removed her and she saw her bio father arrested. And if you have ever heard a bio mother cry when parental rights are terminated.you would understand it is not something to celebrate.
Yes, I've done TPR hearings as a professional. But, when it comes to that, except on a rare occasion, parents had many chances to get it together and the child deserves a family.
There are many kids of adoptions and to lump it all together is absurd.
If you don't agree with adoption, you could have kept your child under guardianship and let the parents maintain their rights.
You don’t have to disagree with adoption to acknowledge the trauma. My kid’s birth mother is dead. So clearly something horrible happened, and clearly he needed to live with someone else. I agree that coming into my home was the best of the available choices, and I am glad that adoption gave him permanency. That doesn’t mean that there wasn’t trauma and loss, even though my child was too young to remember.
The best advice I got was to imagine if his birth mother was my sister. If my sister died and left a child with no living parent then I would welcome that child, and love that child, and feel grateful that they could be with me and not lost to me, and find a way to build a family that experienced love and joy, but none of that would erase the loss. And my child would know that I loved him, and was glad he was with me, and also that I wished things could have been otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Btw I have also heard of this day referred to as a “traumaversary”.
That's absurd.
No it isn't. The day my child came into my care was the day the police broke down a door and removed her and she saw her bio father arrested. And if you have ever heard a bio mother cry when parental rights are terminated.you would understand it is not something to celebrate.
Yes, I've done TPR hearings as a professional. But, when it comes to that, except on a rare occasion, parents had many chances to get it together and the child deserves a family.
There are many kids of adoptions and to lump it all together is absurd.
If you don't agree with adoption, you could have kept your child under guardianship and let the parents maintain their rights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Btw I have also heard of this day referred to as a “traumaversary”.
That's absurd.
No it isn't. The day my child came into my care was the day the police broke down a door and removed her and she saw her bio father arrested. And if you have ever heard a bio mother cry when parental rights are terminated.you would understand it is not something to celebrate.
Yes, I've done TPR hearings as a professional. But, when it comes to that, except on a rare occasion, parents had many chances to get it together and the child deserves a family.
There are many kids of adoptions and to lump it all together is absurd.
If you don't agree with adoption, you could have kept your child under guardianship and let the parents maintain their rights.
It isn't up to the foster parent whether the bios maintain their rights and you should know it.
Foster parents can choose legal guardianship or choose to keep the kids in care and long term foster. There are lots of options. The preference is adoption but often kids stay in long term care or on a rare situation guardianship. Or, you can do an open adoption and continue to allow visits. Its not all or nothing nor should be except in severe cases of abuse or neglect.
They can choose the legal relationship they have to the child (or at least, accept or decline the options they are offered) but they are not able to prevent a TPR if the state choses to seek it. It isn't up to them and if they choose not to adopt, that won't stop the TPR.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Btw I have also heard of this day referred to as a “traumaversary”.
That's absurd.
No it isn't. The day my child came into my care was the day the police broke down a door and removed her and she saw her bio father arrested. And if you have ever heard a bio mother cry when parental rights are terminated.you would understand it is not something to celebrate.
Yes, I've done TPR hearings as a professional. But, when it comes to that, except on a rare occasion, parents had many chances to get it together and the child deserves a family.
There are many kids of adoptions and to lump it all together is absurd.
If you don't agree with adoption, you could have kept your child under guardianship and let the parents maintain their rights.
It isn't up to the foster parent whether the bios maintain their rights and you should know it.
Foster parents can choose legal guardianship or choose to keep the kids in care and long term foster. There are lots of options. The preference is adoption but often kids stay in long term care or on a rare situation guardianship. Or, you can do an open adoption and continue to allow visits. Its not all or nothing nor should be except in severe cases of abuse or neglect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Btw I have also heard of this day referred to as a “traumaversary”.
That's absurd.
No it isn't. The day my child came into my care was the day the police broke down a door and removed her and she saw her bio father arrested. And if you have ever heard a bio mother cry when parental rights are terminated.you would understand it is not something to celebrate.
Yes, I've done TPR hearings as a professional. But, when it comes to that, except on a rare occasion, parents had many chances to get it together and the child deserves a family.
There are many kids of adoptions and to lump it all together is absurd.
If you don't agree with adoption, you could have kept your child under guardianship and let the parents maintain their rights.
It isn't up to the foster parent whether the bios maintain their rights and you should know it.
Anonymous wrote:Never. I loathe "gotcha". Children are not prizes to be captured and the day is a profound ambivalence in my family.