Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a parent with high numbers (for K) at MV and another HRCS, does this effort indicate anything I should be concerned about?
You should keep in mind the teachers are engaging in an effort that will help with stability and long term viability of the school. Charter school teachers are paid less than DCPS and without a seat at the decision-making table, they don't have a lot of power. So this may seem scary or unsettling to potential parents but its something that needs to happen if MV wants to start keeping teachers longer.
Anonymous wrote:As a parent with high numbers (for K) at MV and another HRCS, does this effort indicate anything I should be concerned about?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a parent with high numbers (for K) at MV and another HRCS, does this effort indicate anything I should be concerned about?
That MV teachers care about the future of the school but want a raise and more of a voice in decisions about the school. They feel the voice of front line educators isn’t sought or heeded as much as it could be.
Anonymous wrote:As a parent with high numbers (for K) at MV and another HRCS, does this effort indicate anything I should be concerned about?
Anonymous wrote:As a parent with high numbers (for K) at MV and another HRCS, does this effort indicate anything I should be concerned about?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The teachers are leading this. They've asked for support from parents but that's it.
Ugh. With a new campus and this, it seems like a lot of administrative drama.
Asking for fair treatment and democratic representation at work isn’t administrative drama. Teachers are people too, and they deserve a seat at the table.
PP, fair point. I'm actually very prounion, but watched the Chavez school effort burn. Let me reword: it seems like between this and the logistics of opening a new campus, how is the administration balancing all these efforts at once?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The teachers are leading this. They've asked for support from parents but that's it.
Ugh. With a new campus and this, it seems like a lot of administrative drama.
Asking for fair treatment and democratic representation at work isn’t administrative drama. Teachers are people too, and they deserve a seat at the table.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The teachers are leading this. They've asked for support from parents but that's it.
Ugh. With a new campus and this, it seems like a lot of administrative drama.
Anonymous wrote:The teachers are leading this. They've asked for support from parents but that's it.
Anonymous wrote:When MV decided to expand against the desires of the vast majority of parents, several teachers approached the parents who testified at the charter board hearing and thanked them for speaking out publicly. They said that many, many teachers expressed similar misgivings about the school expanding too soon, but the administration ignored them. And they didn't have to power to speak out publicly. I've heard lots of stories about Spanish-language teachers afraid to speak out about working conditions because of their immigration status. I think this has been an issue for a long time, and it is finally boiling over.
How does it affect kids? They have overworked teachers who are frustrated because they are on the front lines, yet don't have a say in decisions that affect them and their students. I'd rather have teachers who feel appreciated and empowered teaching my kids. But I'm not the least bit surprised that administration is so far unwilling to recognize the union.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are the teachers unhappy with?
From the Post article, it sounds like they feel they don’t have enough support to do their job, and want more of a voice in how the school is run.
What that often translates to in a unionized workplace are things like student/teacher ratio caps, negotiating the length of the workday and probably standardized salary bands.