Anonymous wrote:But SHE choice literally the lowest paying field there is! I applied for publishing jobs when I first moved to NYC after college, and the pay was astoundingly low -- lower than temping, lower than the nonprofit job I ended up taking. I think one of the hiring managers expressly told me that the jobs were INTENDED for people with parental help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is definitely how I feel when I find out people have significant parental help in the form of house down payments (or full purchase price), tuition, completed 529’s, free trips to Hawaii, etc. It’s all very hush hush because they want it to seem like they aren’t getting that much help.
I'm not trying to seem like my father didn't pay for most things I had. I just ... don't really talk about money at all, either way. If you are scraping by and ONLY want to be friends with people who are also scraping by, then you need to find a way to say that. Otherwise, if you're cool, I'm going to try to be friends with you. I have friends who are a part-time bartender, a social worker, a paralegal, a tech chick, general counsel of a company, etc. I'll be friends with anyone whose personality I like. And yes, if that means we meet up to go for a walk because you can't afford anything until payday, then I'm cool with that. Or if you want to grab a slice of pizza and can't afford the fancy Italian restaurant, I'm fine with a slice.
But I shouldn't have to feel bad about what I was given. I work hard, I appreciate what I have, I donate. And I will raise my children to do the same. While yes, giving them the gift of not having to worry about money.
If you are down to earth, that is one thing. If you are expecting to live high on the hog and have your IL's sustain that lifestyle for you (have to have a certain car, for example), that is hard to respect - especially if you bad mouth your ILs.
What does down to earth mean to you? My money comes from the trust funds that earlier generations set up for me. From my family. DH has his own trusts. The only thing my in-laws bought us is a condo in their city, which DH and I are both from, because they wanted us to be able to stay there more often so they'd get more time with our kids. Dh and I buy cars ourselves. And I've never badmouthed my in-laws - it almost seems like you're confusing me with someone else...?
I’m always surprised (and jealous) that so many people on DCUM have trust funds. I don’t know anyone IRL that has a trust fund.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is definitely how I feel when I find out people have significant parental help in the form of house down payments (or full purchase price), tuition, completed 529’s, free trips to Hawaii, etc. It’s all very hush hush because they want it to seem like they aren’t getting that much help.
I'm not trying to seem like my father didn't pay for most things I had. I just ... don't really talk about money at all, either way. If you are scraping by and ONLY want to be friends with people who are also scraping by, then you need to find a way to say that. Otherwise, if you're cool, I'm going to try to be friends with you. I have friends who are a part-time bartender, a social worker, a paralegal, a tech chick, general counsel of a company, etc. I'll be friends with anyone whose personality I like. And yes, if that means we meet up to go for a walk because you can't afford anything until payday, then I'm cool with that. Or if you want to grab a slice of pizza and can't afford the fancy Italian restaurant, I'm fine with a slice.
But I shouldn't have to feel bad about what I was given. I work hard, I appreciate what I have, I donate. And I will raise my children to do the same. While yes, giving them the gift of not having to worry about money.
If you are down to earth, that is one thing. If you are expecting to live high on the hog and have your IL's sustain that lifestyle for you (have to have a certain car, for example), that is hard to respect - especially if you bad mouth your ILs.
What does down to earth mean to you? My money comes from the trust funds that earlier generations set up for me. From my family. DH has his own trusts. The only thing my in-laws bought us is a condo in their city, which DH and I are both from, because they wanted us to be able to stay there more often so they'd get more time with our kids. Dh and I buy cars ourselves. And I've never badmouthed my in-laws - it almost seems like you're confusing me with someone else...?
Anonymous wrote:But SHE choice literally the lowest paying field there is! I applied for publishing jobs when I first moved to NYC after college, and the pay was astoundingly low -- lower than temping, lower than the nonprofit job I ended up taking. I think one of the hiring managers expressly told me that the jobs were INTENDED for people with parental help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can totally relate to the first half of the story. I understand what she is saying in the rest.
I feel envy at those who can comfortably send their kids to private. I felt envy (near rage) when having worked for 13 years each in professional careers (26 years could be someone’s entire career), we were struggling to buy an entry level crappy house in Arlington Mclean or Vienna. I had started off earning six figures, mostly did those 13 years, but could not believe how difficult it was to afford that house (after taxes daycare expenses what not).
I have seen what the author describes. People who are able to hang in there, develop and ultimately get some success in industries or careers that are not a real choice unless someone can heavily subsidize them the first 10-20 years (such as in the arts).
I just wanted to say that we don’t talk about things in that article or class issues often enough or open enough.
It’s like Hill staffers. Parents subsidize them until they become lobbyists.
But if you have half a brain, you don’t become a hill staffer unless your family has $$$. Certain fields are luxury goods. Plan accordingly.
A lot of good people don’t realize this. They aren’t dumb, just a little naive.
Anonymous wrote:I’m the PP with the SAHM neighbor. She is very opinionated on why she just couldn’t be happy with anything less than a BMW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can totally relate to the first half of the story. I understand what she is saying in the rest.
I feel envy at those who can comfortably send their kids to private. I felt envy (near rage) when having worked for 13 years each in professional careers (26 years could be someone’s entire career), we were struggling to buy an entry level crappy house in Arlington Mclean or Vienna. I had started off earning six figures, mostly did those 13 years, but could not believe how difficult it was to afford that house (after taxes daycare expenses what not).
I have seen what the author describes. People who are able to hang in there, develop and ultimately get some success in industries or careers that are not a real choice unless someone can heavily subsidize them the first 10-20 years (such as in the arts).
I just wanted to say that we don’t talk about things in that article or class issues often enough or open enough.
It’s like Hill staffers. Parents subsidize them until they become lobbyists.
But if you have half a brain, you don’t become a hill staffer unless your family has $$$. Certain fields are luxury goods. Plan accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:She is ridiculous. I didn’t grow up with money. But I knew I wanted a certain lifestyle. So I went in to a high paying field. And made a good salary and met my spouse who was in a similar high paying field. I didn’t follow my dream or passion. I did what would yield the most $. People make different choices. Some are born lucky. Some make a ton of money being in the right place at the right time. Some people work really really hard. I am happy to pay my taxes and support a strong safety net. But her class rage is totally ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can totally relate to the first half of the story. I understand what she is saying in the rest.
I feel envy at those who can comfortably send their kids to private. I felt envy (near rage) when having worked for 13 years each in professional careers (26 years could be someone’s entire career), we were struggling to buy an entry level crappy house in Arlington Mclean or Vienna. I had started off earning six figures, mostly did those 13 years, but could not believe how difficult it was to afford that house (after taxes daycare expenses what not).
I have seen what the author describes. People who are able to hang in there, develop and ultimately get some success in industries or careers that are not a real choice unless someone can heavily subsidize them the first 10-20 years (such as in the arts).
I just wanted to say that we don’t talk about things in that article or class issues often enough or open enough.
It’s like Hill staffers. Parents subsidize them until they become lobbyists.
Anonymous wrote:I can totally relate to the first half of the story. I understand what she is saying in the rest.
I feel envy at those who can comfortably send their kids to private. I felt envy (near rage) when having worked for 13 years each in professional careers (26 years could be someone’s entire career), we were struggling to buy an entry level crappy house in Arlington Mclean or Vienna. I had started off earning six figures, mostly did those 13 years, but could not believe how difficult it was to afford that house (after taxes daycare expenses what not).
I have seen what the author describes. People who are able to hang in there, develop and ultimately get some success in industries or careers that are not a real choice unless someone can heavily subsidize them the first 10-20 years (such as in the arts).
I just wanted to say that we don’t talk about things in that article or class issues often enough or open enough.