Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ we did this. The overtime would have sunk us
sounds good in theory, but it's hard to find part-time nannies, let alone part-time nannies responsible enough to coordinate with another nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you really spend over 4,000 a month for the nanny? You are paying over $200 a day. Since she is on the books you also pay her social security? Are you then paying 5,000 a month?
The full time job for the nanny is being a nanny. It's not like hiring a teen or a college student who is still living with their parents and the sitter;s parents are taking care of the mortgage payment, the water bill, etc. A nanny is out there living a grownup life, with rent to pay, electric bill to pay, car payments to make, groceries, etc.
Having a nanny is a "top of the line" type of childcare arrangement.
Anonymous wrote:Personally I would get a second nanny and schedule them to both to work less. Schedule the first nanny for 8:30-6 three days a week so 28.5 hours per week. Then schedule the second nanny to come in and work 8:30-6 the other two days per week. You can pay each $23/hr and you'll still come out ahead ($1092) of what you should be paying ($22/hr * 40 + $33 * 7.5 = $1127.50) since you won't be paying either one overtime for over 40 hours/wk. You would pay more for a second healthcare policy, but this way you have built in back-up for each. Each could take vacations and you would pay ($23*40 + $34.50*7.5 = 1178.75) or only about $100 more for the week that they go away. Also, each could take a day here or there like for doctor's appointments or going to their own child's school event, etc and your weekly rate wouldn't change as you still wouldn't be going over 40 hours/week, so no overtime. You just tell them that they can work/cover for each other as long as neither one works over 40 hours in a week. If one needs to work over 40 hours to accommodate the other, they have to clear it with you before hand (so you know that it is a special case and not a regular thing). I've seen more than one household use something similar to this model.
Anonymous wrote:Do you really spend over 4,000 a month for the nanny? You are paying over $200 a day. Since she is on the books you also pay her social security? Are you then paying 5,000 a month?
Anonymous wrote:^^ we did this. The overtime would have sunk us
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need to talk to an employment lawyer.
Why? OP presumably made a contract for a certain set of hours and days. Nanny doesn't want to do it anymore. That's just cause to terminate the contract. It's unreasonable for the nanny to only want to work 4 hours a day for 8 hours when she agreed otherwise at the time of hiring.
Anonymous wrote:Do you really spend over 4,000 a month for the nanny? You are paying over $200 a day. Since she is on the books you also pay her social security? Are you then paying 5,000 a month?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you really spend over 4,000 a month for the nanny? You are paying over $200 a day. Since she is on the books you also pay her social security? Are you then paying 5,000 a month?
Two infants in a center full time actually comes in close to that in most big cities.
Anonymous wrote:Do you really spend over 4,000 a month for the nanny? You are paying over $200 a day. Since she is on the books you also pay her social security? Are you then paying 5,000 a month?