Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
The prevalence of redshirting around here is baffling. The cutoff is what it is. Unless there is an educator telling you it might be best to wait, send your kid to school on schedule.
Educators told us to wait due to immaturity issues. It was 100% the right call.
That’s a made up reasons to keep you in their preschool longer. Can’t wait til it’s outlawed.
I think in CA they passed some rule that only allows for redshirting if you have a doctor's note to indicate some development delay. If you hold back your kid from starting K on time, when the child is registered for school, the school will determine if that child should just go straight to 1st grade. I think this is a good idea.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2013/02/08/mountain-view-school-may-overrule-parents-wishes-on-when-kids-start-first-grade/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
Redshirting is for cowardly parents without faith in their kids
Wow! So mean! You sound jealous and bitter
Or she’s just rightfully annoyed that she followed the rules and now her kid has kids more than a year older in the class and playing against them in sport.
She had the choice (maybe still has)... if she is unhappy how things turned out for her kid, she should have made a different decision.
If the rules allow it, why should my kid be the youngest? Let it be her kid
My child is the youngest. Its not about being the youngest but going on time. I feel bad for your kid that you either think they are too dumb or immature to attend school or your poor parenting and choices in preschool didn't prepare them. Your child isn't smarter because they are a year older. So, you keep bragging how smart your kid is when they are average or actually behind because you held them back a year academically.
Actually I am not the one insulting you or your kid... that does not speak highly of you. No, I did not redshirt for an academic advantage at all. My DD is smart (not a genious as proven by the WPPSI), but she is sensitive and insecure and definitely not a go getter. We are sending her to perhaps the best preschool in DC (as judged by DCUM)... I really don’tbunderstand why you are so angry and bitter... maybe you regret your choices... yes, it must be it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
The prevalence of redshirting around here is baffling. The cutoff is what it is. Unless there is an educator telling you it might be best to wait, send your kid to school on schedule.
Educators told us to wait due to immaturity issues. It was 100% the right call.
That’s a made up reasons to keep you in their preschool longer. Can’t wait til it’s outlawed.
I think in CA they passed some rule that only allows for redshirting if you have a doctor's note to indicate some development delay. If you hold back your kid from starting K on time, when the child is registered for school, the school will determine if that child should just go straight to 1st grade. I think this is a good idea.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2013/02/08/mountain-view-school-may-overrule-parents-wishes-on-when-kids-start-first-grade/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
Redshirting is for cowardly parents without faith in their kids
Wow! So mean! You sound jealous and bitter
Or she’s just rightfully annoyed that she followed the rules and now her kid has kids more than a year older in the class and playing against them in sport.
She had the choice (maybe still has)... if she is unhappy how things turned out for her kid, she should have made a different decision.
If the rules allow it, why should my kid be the youngest? Let it be her kid
My child is the youngest. Its not about being the youngest but going on time. I feel bad for your kid that you either think they are too dumb or immature to attend school or your poor parenting and choices in preschool didn't prepare them. Your child isn't smarter because they are a year older. So, you keep bragging how smart your kid is when they are average or actually behind because you held them back a year academically.
Actually I am not the one insulting you or your kid... that does not speak highly of you. No, I did not redshirt for an academic advantage at all. My DD is smart (not a genious as proven by the WPPSI), but she is sensitive and insecure and definitely not a go getter. We are sending her to perhaps the best preschool in DC (as judged by DCUM)... I really don’tbunderstand why you are so angry and bitter... maybe you regret your choices... yes, it must be it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
The prevalence of redshirting around here is baffling. The cutoff is what it is. Unless there is an educator telling you it might be best to wait, send your kid to school on schedule.
Educators told us to wait due to immaturity issues. It was 100% the right call.
That’s a made up reasons to keep you in their preschool longer. Can’t wait til it’s outlawed.
I think in CA they passed some rule that only allows for redshirting if you have a doctor's note to indicate some development delay. If you hold back your kid from starting K on time, when the child is registered for school, the school will determine if that child should just go straight to 1st grade. I think this is a good idea.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2013/02/08/mountain-view-school-may-overrule-parents-wishes-on-when-kids-start-first-grade/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
The prevalence of redshirting around here is baffling. The cutoff is what it is. Unless there is an educator telling you it might be best to wait, send your kid to school on schedule.
Educators told us to wait due to immaturity issues. It was 100% the right call.
That’s a made up reasons to keep you in their preschool longer. Can’t wait til it’s outlawed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
The prevalence of redshirting around here is baffling. The cutoff is what it is. Unless there is an educator telling you it might be best to wait, send your kid to school on schedule.
Educators told us to wait due to immaturity issues. It was 100% the right call.
That’s a made up reasons to keep you in their preschool longer. Can’t wait til it’s outlawed.
They don’t need to ban it, they just need to do ALL testing by age (by birth month). That’s gifted testing, SATs, etc. And all school sports should also be done by age and not grade.
So basically let them sit in whatever classroom they want, and talk to those kids at lunch, but remove the more obvious unfair advantages.
I’m sure most redshirting parents will decide pretty fast that their kid doesn’t need to be redshirted after all.
I decided to redshirt exactly for those lunch, play and class time... not because my kid would have an “advantage” with the school work
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
Redshirting is for cowardly parents without faith in their kids
Wow! So mean! You sound jealous and bitter
Or she’s just rightfully annoyed that she followed the rules and now her kid has kids more than a year older in the class and playing against them in sport.
She had the choice (maybe still has)... if she is unhappy how things turned out for her kid, she should have made a different decision.
If the rules allow it, why should my kid be the youngest? Let it be her kid
Anonymous wrote:We did not. She's now in high school.
It was a bit rough in early grade school because some kids in her class were a full year (or more) older. But now you can't tell the difference. Always being the youngest taught her to work harder academically. Nothing was ever handed to her; she had to reach. It is paying off now right when it needs to.
You know your kid best. If she's strong-willed, go for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
The prevalence of redshirting around here is baffling. The cutoff is what it is. Unless there is an educator telling you it might be best to wait, send your kid to school on schedule.
Educators told us to wait due to immaturity issues. It was 100% the right call.
That’s a made up reasons to keep you in their preschool longer. Can’t wait til it’s outlawed.
They don’t need to ban it, they just need to do ALL testing by age (by birth month). That’s gifted testing, SATs, etc. And all school sports should also be done by age and not grade.
So basically let them sit in whatever classroom they want, and talk to those kids at lunch, but remove the more obvious unfair advantages.
I’m sure most redshirting parents will decide pretty fast that their kid doesn’t need to be redshirted after all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
The prevalence of redshirting around here is baffling. The cutoff is what it is. Unless there is an educator telling you it might be best to wait, send your kid to school on schedule.
Educators told us to wait due to immaturity issues. It was 100% the right call.
That’s a made up reasons to keep you in their preschool longer. Can’t wait til it’s outlawed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Send your child to school. What is the drama? Why does it matter what someone else did?
+1
Redshirting is for cowardly parents without faith in their kids
Wow! So mean! You sound jealous and bitter
Or she’s just rightfully annoyed that she followed the rules and now her kid has kids more than a year older in the class and playing against them in sport.
She had the choice (maybe still has)... if she is unhappy how things turned out for her kid, she should have made a different decision.