Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A vote for republicans is a vote for taking money out of the pockets of the middle class and giving it to millionaires/billionaires
No, that was Obamacare, stealing people from the middle class to make pharma and insurers dirty rich.
Tax reform has given us the healthiest economy and labor market in decades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm personally suprised by the people who say they are owing even with 0 withholdings. Did you all change to 0 half-way through the year? Are you sure you were actually at 0?
it's the withholding tables that were the problem that payroll based deduction off of. clearly you do not understand how taxes work. Additionally if you have 2 earners and they is a vast discrepancy in earnings, then the tax tables for withholding will be different, but at filing will cause you to owe.
The ignorance on this board sometimes makes me want to smash my head on my computer and then weep for our nation.
Well that's kind of my point - why would the withholding tables be so far off? Previously they were biased in favor of overwithholding. My understanding that the current tweak was aimed to get them closer to 0 liability -- not people owing $1000s, like they are stating here. I'm wondering how the IRS got it so wrong, since I doubt their intent was that people would owe $1000s with 0 exemptions.
No. This was intentional. It was to make people think the tax “cuts” were great and get people to vote for the GOP in the midterms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm personally suprised by the people who say they are owing even with 0 withholdings. Did you all change to 0 half-way through the year? Are you sure you were actually at 0?
it's the withholding tables that were the problem that payroll based deduction off of. clearly you do not understand how taxes work. Additionally if you have 2 earners and they is a vast discrepancy in earnings, then the tax tables for withholding will be different, but at filing will cause you to owe.
The ignorance on this board sometimes makes me want to smash my head on my computer and then weep for our nation.
Well that's kind of my point - why would the withholding tables be so far off? Previously they were biased in favor of overwithholding. My understanding that the current tweak was aimed to get them closer to 0 liability -- not people owing $1000s, like they are stating here. I'm wondering how the IRS got it so wrong, since I doubt their intent was that people would owe $1000s with 0 exemptions.
No. This was intentional. It was to make people think the tax “cuts” were great and get people to vote for the GOP in the midterms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm personally suprised by the people who say they are owing even with 0 withholdings. Did you all change to 0 half-way through the year? Are you sure you were actually at 0?
it's the withholding tables that were the problem that payroll based deduction off of. clearly you do not understand how taxes work. Additionally if you have 2 earners and they is a vast discrepancy in earnings, then the tax tables for withholding will be different, but at filing will cause you to owe.
The ignorance on this board sometimes makes me want to smash my head on my computer and then weep for our nation.
Well that's kind of my point - why would the withholding tables be so far off? Previously they were biased in favor of overwithholding. My understanding that the current tweak was aimed to get them closer to 0 liability -- not people owing $1000s, like they are stating here. I'm wondering how the IRS got it so wrong, since I doubt their intent was that people would owe $1000s with 0 exemptions.
No. This was intentional. It was to make people think the tax “cuts” were great and get people to vote for the GOP in the midterms.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm personally suprised by the people who say they are owing even with 0 withholdings. Did you all change to 0 half-way through the year? Are you sure you were actually at 0?
it's the withholding tables that were the problem that payroll based deduction off of. clearly you do not understand how taxes work. Additionally if you have 2 earners and they is a vast discrepancy in earnings, then the tax tables for withholding will be different, but at filing will cause you to owe.
The ignorance on this board sometimes makes me want to smash my head on my computer and then weep for our nation.
Well that's kind of my point - why would the withholding tables be so far off? Previously they were biased in favor of overwithholding. My understanding that the current tweak was aimed to get them closer to 0 liability -- not people owing $1000s, like they are stating here. I'm wondering how the IRS got it so wrong, since I doubt their intent was that people would owe $1000s with 0 exemptions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s zero exemptions. You took zero exemptions. Not zero “withholding.” A person taking zero exemptions actually withholds more than someone taking more exemptions.
It is just short hand. Don’t be pedantic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm personally suprised by the people who say they are owing even with 0 withholdings. Did you all change to 0 half-way through the year? Are you sure you were actually at 0?
it's the withholding tables that were the problem that payroll based deduction off of. clearly you do not understand how taxes work. Additionally if you have 2 earners and they is a vast discrepancy in earnings, then the tax tables for withholding will be different, but at filing will cause you to owe.
The ignorance on this board sometimes makes me want to smash my head on my computer and then weep for our nation.
Anonymous wrote:It’s zero exemptions. You took zero exemptions. Not zero “withholding.” A person taking zero exemptions actually withholds more than someone taking more exemptions.
Anonymous wrote:I'm personally suprised by the people who say they are owing even with 0 withholdings. Did you all change to 0 half-way through the year? Are you sure you were actually at 0?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh well, you owe the same amount anyway, so what’s the big deal? Yes, we also got hit with a big end of the year tax bill, but our overall taxes went way down, so I really see no reason to complain. The difference is we didn’t give the government a no interest loan for once, instead they gave us one!
You are not a drama queen.
OP is.
Anonymous wrote:I feel stupid. How are you calculating this change? I paid more this year than last year, but income increased too--so of course I paid more. Are you just calculating the overall percent of taxes paid to income?
Our refund is half what it usually is (I like the forced savings, so it is usually $5-6k and pays for our vacations for the year), but this year it is only $3k.
HHI @180k with 3 kids and got dicked over by the SALT.