Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's what SATs are for. A first grader may have other issues that haven't allowed him to fully develop to his full IQ potential yet.
Overwhelming majority of colleges admit anyone with a pulse. Only the top 100 or so have any sort of admissions standards. And new trend amongst state schools and crummy privates is to remove all math and science requirements because so many of the dummies they admit can't earn even a 2.0 in college algebra and chemistry. Days of a bachelors degree teasing out IQ are long gone.
What a disgusting comment.
+1
I would much rather my kid end up a low IQ student who can’t “even earn a 2.0” without removing math and science requirements than a bitchy person like you — even if he or she is a bitchy person like you who attends Stanford, takes an incredibly difficult course load, & graduates with a 4.0.
Anonymous wrote:My kid has an IQ of 95, which is low average. He gets straight As in school. Please do not judge people on IQ. Humans are complex creatures.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many things to unpack in this post.
IQ tests on first graders are notoriously unreliable. They are particularly unreliable for children who have disabilities, live in poverty, or are being educated in a language that isn't their dominant language. I'd be very hesitant to make any kind of prediction about a child's future based on an IQ test at that age. In fact, I know more than child who tested quite low (IQ score below 80) who now attends an Ivy League school.
The second thing I'd encourage you to do is to broaden your understanding of what "college" is. I think that sometimes if someone did college the traditional way, where they chose a college with a national reputation, lived in campus, took a full course load of credit bearing for 4 straight years, and earned a bachelor's degree, they can think that that's what college is. But college can look many different ways. It can include classes that lead to a certificate and a career as a child care provider, or a carpenter, or a dog groomer. It can include people taking one or two classes at a time, and getting a degree in 10 years, instead of 2. It can include people with a variety of disabilities taking classes for credit with accommodations (e.g. braille textbooks), or support (e.g. a tutor), or non credit classes with modifications (e.g. the students referenced above with Down syndrome and other types of intellectual disabilities). All of these people are college students too. Given the wide variety of ways that there are to attend college, college really can be a choice for everyone.
The last thing to remember is that the goal isn't that every kid goes to college, it's that every kid graduates in a position to be able to make that choice for themselves. What does that mean? It means that their reading, writing and math skills are as strong as they can be. It means that they have experience exploring challenging content, taking positions, and defending them with evidence. It means that they know about academic honesty. It also means that they've learned to manage a complicated schedule and workload, and to interact with a variety of adults. Interestingly, even if a kid doesn't choose to go to college, or to go right to college, these skills will serve them well.
In the world of education, the goal does seem to be that outside of those with severe special needs, every kid go to college. That is what the OP is lamenting about.
Anonymous wrote:The average IQ for college graduates is 105-110. You need to be slightly brighter than average
Anonymous wrote:Just curious about this. Someone mentioned on another thread that people need a minimum IQ for college. If you agree, what would it be? I mentioned that I teach first grade and we have students with low IQs yet it is drilled into us that everyone must be college ready. How realistic is this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s the thing. They have already been tested and while they have low IQs, they don’t qualify for an IEP. What will their future be?
Plumbers, electricians, carpenters who will out earn the college educated particularly teachers.
Why does everyone assume that these jobs can be performed with a low iq? Yes, the education involved in getting those jobs might be attainable for those with low iq. But actually doing the job well enough to be employable actually does take quite a bit of smarts. Many blue collar jobs that DCUM seems to think anyone can do, take just as much smarts if not more than some more white collar jobs. I wouldn't assume that the kids with low iqs will become plumbers or electricians (not sure about carpenters). And if they did become them, they very well might not be able to keep their jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's what SATs are for. A first grader may have other issues that haven't allowed him to fully develop to his full IQ potential yet.
Overwhelming majority of colleges admit anyone with a pulse. Only the top 100 or so have any sort of admissions standards. And new trend amongst state schools and crummy privates is to remove all math and science requirements because so many of the dummies they admit can't earn even a 2.0 in college algebra and chemistry. Days of a bachelors degree teasing out IQ are long gone.
What a disgusting comment.
+1
I would much rather my kid end up a low IQ student who can’t “even earn a 2.0” without removing math and science requirements than a bitchy person like you — even if he or she is a bitchy person like you who attends Stanford, takes an incredibly difficult course load, & graduates with a 4.0.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s the thing. They have already been tested and while they have low IQs, they don’t qualify for an IEP. What will their future be?
Plumbers, electricians, carpenters who will out earn the college educated particularly teachers.