Anonymous wrote:Christians, fighting hard to put Christ back into Christmas while skipping keeping Christ in Christianity.
Anonymous wrote:This means Pence will never be a successful presidential candidate. Most ambitious Vice Presidents wives launch a First Lady type initiative to lend a sympathetic, caring tone to their men.
She's probably filling the family's coffers because defense lawyers are expensive and Pence is in Russiagate up to his lying eyeballs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Funny that this thread is about teaching art to Christian children and it's one of the most vitriolic, profane exchanges on this board (which is saying a lot).
Did we hit a nerve, Trumpies?
uh . . . Who was originally butthurt?
OP is taking offense at Pence's new teaching position. Remember that this is a private school embracing a religious philosophy. Many religions either condone homosexuality or just barely tolerate it. As a former Catholic who attended Catholic school, I can share what the beliefs were. Sue, you can be gay but don't act on those "impulses." So you either follow the rules or move on.
It is what it is.
So this is where I just have to laugh at the hypocrisy of the neo liberals, which is an appropriate term these days. You'll fight to the death to be "inclusive" in SOME cases but will attack when a religion excludes certain people and forbids specific practices.
Let's look at a woman's right to cover. You must know that the Koran is not gay-friendly. But if she sends her child to a school steeped in "true" Islamic doctirne (as in what's in the Koran is right), do you "love the sinner but hate the sin?"
And what's the sin in this case? her belief system? which is, by the way, the same "extended" doctrine which encourages her to cover
Would you become angry is this woman were president or First Lady?
You can't have it both ways.
Just as long as you acknowledge that these same people crying about religious liberty would be raging at a second lady going to teach at a madrasa.
We get it. Karen Pence thinks a huge number of American citizens should suppress their true selves or face eternity in hell. It is equally valid that those Americans and their family/friends have an equal right to think Karen Pence is a looney whose ideas are psychologically harmful. She doesn’t accept them for who they are and they don’t accept her for who she is. Freedom!
Anonymous wrote:Is Karen Pence trolling Jill Biden in the upsidedown?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Funny that this thread is about teaching art to Christian children and it's one of the most vitriolic, profane exchanges on this board (which is saying a lot).
Did we hit a nerve, Trumpies?
uh . . . Who was originally butthurt?
OP is taking offense at Pence's new teaching position. Remember that this is a private school embracing a religious philosophy. Many religions either condone homosexuality or just barely tolerate it. As a former Catholic who attended Catholic school, I can share what the beliefs were. Sue, you can be gay but don't act on those "impulses." So you either follow the rules or move on.
It is what it is.
So this is where I just have to laugh at the hypocrisy of the neo liberals, which is an appropriate term these days. You'll fight to the death to be "inclusive" in SOME cases but will attack when a religion excludes certain people and forbids specific practices.
Let's look at a woman's right to cover. You must know that the Koran is not gay-friendly. But if she sends her child to a school steeped in "true" Islamic doctirne (as in what's in the Koran is right), do you "love the sinner but hate the sin?"
And what's the sin in this case? her belief system? which is, by the way, the same "extended" doctrine which encourages her to cover
Would you become angry is this woman were president or First Lady?
You can't have it both ways.
Anonymous wrote:Ben Shapiro on Twitter:
“Which is more discriminatory: a private school requiring that its voluntary attendees abide by a code of conduct, or people saying such a school should not exist because that school disagrees with their ideas?”
Anonymous wrote:Funny that this thread is about teaching art to Christian children and it's one of the most vitriolic, profane exchanges on this board (which is saying a lot).
Did we hit a nerve, Trumpies?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ben Shapiro on Twitter:
“Which is more discriminatory: a private school requiring that its voluntary attendees abide by a code of conduct, or people saying such a school should not exist because that school disagrees with their ideas?”
Name one poster or person who has said the school “shouldn’t exist.” Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Ben Shapiro on Twitter:
“Which is more discriminatory: a private school requiring that its voluntary attendees abide by a code of conduct, or people saying such a school should not exist because that school disagrees with their ideas?”
Anonymous wrote:These religious zealots are such hypocrites.....a pox on them all.
Anonymous wrote:She's a hypocrite. A school that considers extramarital sex immoral while her husband fronts for a thrice married adulterer.
Anonymous wrote:Ben Shapiro on Twitter:
“Which is more discriminatory: a private school requiring that its voluntary attendees abide by a code of conduct, or people saying such a school should not exist because that school disagrees with their ideas?”
Anonymous wrote:So what? It's a Christian school. Obviously many Christians believe that engaging in same sex sexual behavior is a sin. Are Christians now required to accept same sex relations?