Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to worry until I decided to be proactive. I have a "business class to Zurich" fund which is less than the cost of half a year in care. I take the SAGE test from the University of Ohio every 6 months. That way I can ensure I catch the "competent" window of Alzheimer's. At the first signs I will check out gracefully and not burden my family and lose a lifetime of assets. You have a pretty long window but most people do not want to know they have it, they are more concerned about losing their driver's license than losing their minds, so they just sink into oblivion.
I got the idea after reading this woman's blog. It's and account of the wastefulness of Alzheimer's, completely unvarnished. http://www.deadatnoon.com/
I'm with you![/quote
This 100 percent! DH and I have long term care policies and honestly I hope we never have to use them. My own dear 95 year old dad spent the last 15 months of his life under hospice care bedridden in my childhood home dining room. Nearly killed my mom - my worst nightmare. This is such a better plan.
These things do not cover much. Just do the numbers.
Anonymous wrote:Zurich costs between 10-12K depending on the fluctuation of the Swiss franc, including cremation, so not really all that much. I include 2 business class tickets, top hotels etc. etc. so 30K is on the high end and it will cover a vacation for my travel companion afterwards before they fly back. Anybody can pre-save 30K ahead of time. I have seen too many people ruining their daughter's lives, it's always their daughter, and then blowing through an entire lifetime of assets for no purpose.
I find it morally abhorrent to dump on low-status women who end up working at care homes. It reeks of "massah and the slaves" to me. But by being proactive and agreeing with Emanuel Ezekiel, I am considered strange and the "head in the sand" people who end up costing society a fortune are completely normal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does “check out gracefully” mean?
Assisted suicide
Where is that legal in the US?
Anonymous wrote:Most people who need long-term 24/7 care need it for 2 years or less (because they pass away) so save up enough for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most people who need long-term 24/7 care need it for 2 years or less (because they pass away) so save up enough for that.
That is a ridiculous assumption. It works out for you to believe this, but you have no idea what to expect.
Anonymous wrote:That's what is awful- I don't want to live with Alzheimers or dementia- but the government won't allow assisted suicide for these events (my understanding). I have made absolutely sure that we do not live in a state with a familial responsibility law and will advise my child when he's of age to choose a state without familial responsibility. That is next, folks. When long term care, savings, assets, and medicaid won't pay, they will come after your children for the money.
And, +1 to the medi+eldercare industrial complex being a racket. They are after your money, and will vacuum it all up! I read an article in the Atlantic monthly about refusing antibiotics for elderly and allowing them to succumb to pneumonia. This used to be the natural way for an elderly person to pass, but nursing homes are very quick to deliver a patient to the hospital for a round of IV antibiotics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to worry until I decided to be proactive. I have a "business class to Zurich" fund which is less than the cost of half a year in care. I take the SAGE test from the University of Ohio every 6 months. That way I can ensure I catch the "competent" window of Alzheimer's. At the first signs I will check out gracefully and not burden my family and lose a lifetime of assets. You have a pretty long window but most people do not want to know they have it, they are more concerned about losing their driver's license than losing their minds, so they just sink into oblivion.
I got the idea after reading this woman's blog. It's and account of the wastefulness of Alzheimer's, completely unvarnished. http://www.deadatnoon.com/
I'm with you![/quote
This 100 percent! DH and I have long term care policies and honestly I hope we never have to use them. My own dear 95 year old dad spent the last 15 months of his life under hospice care bedridden in my childhood home dining room. Nearly killed my mom - my worst nightmare. This is such a better plan.
+1 This was my grandmother in her own dining room. Such a pitiful waste.
And, +1 to the medi+eldercare industrial complex being a racket. They are after your money, and will vacuum it all up! I read an article in the Atlantic monthly about refusing antibiotics for elderly and allowing them to succumb to pneumonia. This used to be the natural way for an elderly person to pass, but nursing homes are very quick to deliver a patient to the hospital for a round of IV antibiotics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to worry until I decided to be proactive. I have a "business class to Zurich" fund which is less than the cost of half a year in care. I take the SAGE test from the University of Ohio every 6 months. That way I can ensure I catch the "competent" window of Alzheimer's. At the first signs I will check out gracefully and not burden my family and lose a lifetime of assets. You have a pretty long window but most people do not want to know they have it, they are more concerned about losing their driver's license than losing their minds, so they just sink into oblivion.
I got the idea after reading this woman's blog. It's and account of the wastefulness of Alzheimer's, completely unvarnished. http://www.deadatnoon.com/
I'm with you![/quote
This 100 percent! DH and I have long term care policies and honestly I hope we never have to use them. My own dear 95 year old dad spent the last 15 months of his life under hospice care bedridden in my childhood home dining room. Nearly killed my mom - my worst nightmare. This is such a better plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most people who need long-term 24/7 care need it for 2 years or less (because they pass away) so save up enough for that.
That is a ridiculous assumption. It works out for you to believe this, but you have no idea what to expect.
No, PP is correct that the average reliance on long-term care - in-home or nursing home - is 2 years.
https://www.morningstar.com/articles/823957/75-mustknow-statistics-about-longterm-care.html
My relative that bought long term care insurance for her husband said that the cost of the long term care insurance was about break even at two years of care. So you are betting you’ll live longer than two years, and they are betting you won’t.
The more I learn about Medicaid coverage of long term care, the worse it seems. It’s literally not enough to cover the cost of care so nursing homes either won’t accept it or only accept it by gaming the system in other ways.
What are you talking about, yes medicaid LTC covers the full cost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of good discussions on bogleheads money and finance forum about retirement savings, the cost of long term care, etc.
I too have made my wishes known. Once my faculties are gone, I would prefer not to keep going.
Making your wishes known does not help. Your family cannot agree to kill you. If your body is still functioning you will sit and wait (and pay) until death.