Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I noticed more black extras in the second season of Mrs. Maisel, eating at the table behind her in the deli (maybe this would have been realistic) and shopping at the high end Midtown department store she worked at (unlikely that there were many black women shopping at such a place in the 1950s). If Midge was a real person, she probably could have gone through most of her life without seeing a black person at all.
Also, has anyone noticed the glut of TV ads over the past year featuring black/white couples? There are many such couples in real life but it seems a little overly representative and forced.
I'm trying and failing to see what the problem is with any of this.
None of it is real anyhow. Have you ever seen anyone that excited to clean their house or eat a salad in the real world?
Not a problem, just a little unrealistic and forced.
do you realize how ridiculous and terribly sound? It seems ridiculous and forced that commercials are showing interracial couples which do actually exist?
Or that there are black folks in the background. The background--not even being given a main role? Jesus. The show uses 21st and current vernacular in slang. Just roll with it. Damn
You are so clueless as to how bigoted you sound. And you are probably the loudest screamer about how you're not racist or bigoted or prejudiced at all. You're just telling the truth. Am I right? I'm right!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s color-conscious casting.
Honestly, you’re watching a film where characters burst into song, jump into china bowls, and have a coral reef adventure in the bathtub. If the fact that there’s a black lawyer takes you out of the moment, you might want to check your suspension of disbelief.
It's still distracting in a historical setting and whitewashes the very real issues of discrimination and racism that were present in the era. What purpose does it serve in a historical setting other than for the producers to pat themselves on the back for promoting diversity?
Anonymous wrote:The classic Mary Poppins gifs are well played, kudos PP!

Anonymous wrote:Just saw the new Mary Poppins movie. The issue of casting diversity is hardly new and I thought the color blind casting of Lin-Manuel Miranda in a "white" role was very effective because he was very believable in the role (not to mention he's incredibly talented). Yes, his accent was a little weird but I had no problem believing that he could have been a lamplighter in that era of London. Good casting.
Then there was the casting of black actors as one of the lawyers and the executive secretary to the man at the bank. Let's be real: in 1930s-1940s London (the implied era), there wouldn't have been black people in those jobs. By pretending that they would have, it glosses over the racism and discrimination of that era. Yes, this is a fantasy Disney movie, but it's highly unrealistic casting for a historical setting.
Which leads me to wonder if this was color "blind" casting or color "quota" casting? It felt like Disney was worried this period piece would feel too white so they decided to plop some black faces into roles that were historically inaccurate so they could take some credit for diversity on film. Isn't that tokenism?
Don't get me wrong, I totally support color blind casting when it makes sense, but there are certain times when this casting push gets distracting and frankly feels like pandering when placed into a historical setting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I noticed more black extras in the second season of Mrs. Maisel, eating at the table behind her in the deli (maybe this would have been realistic) and shopping at the high end Midtown department store she worked at (unlikely that there were many black women shopping at such a place in the 1950s). If Midge was a real person, she probably could have gone through most of her life without seeing a black person at all.
Also, has anyone noticed the glut of TV ads over the past year featuring black/white couples? There are many such couples in real life but it seems a little overly representative and forced.
I'm trying and failing to see what the problem is with any of this.
None of it is real anyhow. Have you ever seen anyone that excited to clean their house or eat a salad in the real world?
Not a problem, just a little unrealistic and forced.
do you realize how ridiculous and terribly sound? It seems ridiculous and forced that commercials are showing interracial couples which do actually exist?
Or that there are black folks in the background. The background--not even being given a main role? Jesus. The show uses 21st and current vernacular in slang. Just roll with it. Damn
You are so clueless as to how bigoted you sound. And you are probably the loudest screamer about how you're not racist or bigoted or prejudiced at all. You're just telling the truth. Am I right? I'm right!
Anonymous wrote:You do realize there were in fact black barristers in the UK in the 30s and 40s right
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I noticed more black extras in the second season of Mrs. Maisel, eating at the table behind her in the deli (maybe this would have been realistic) and shopping at the high end Midtown department store she worked at (unlikely that there were many black women shopping at such a place in the 1950s). If Midge was a real person, she probably could have gone through most of her life without seeing a black person at all.
Also, has anyone noticed the glut of TV ads over the past year featuring black/white couples? There are many such couples in real life but it seems a little overly representative and forced.
I'm trying and failing to see what the problem is with any of this.
None of it is real anyhow. Have you ever seen anyone that excited to clean their house or eat a salad in the real world?
Not a problem, just a little unrealistic and forced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I noticed more black extras in the second season of Mrs. Maisel, eating at the table behind her in the deli (maybe this would have been realistic) and shopping at the high end Midtown department store she worked at (unlikely that there were many black women shopping at such a place in the 1950s). If Midge was a real person, she probably could have gone through most of her life without seeing a black person at all.
Also, has anyone noticed the glut of TV ads over the past year featuring black/white couples? There are many such couples in real life but it seems a little overly representative and forced.
I'm trying and failing to see what the problem is with any of this.
None of it is real anyhow. Have you ever seen anyone that excited to clean their house or eat a salad in the real world?
Anonymous wrote:I noticed more black extras in the second season of Mrs. Maisel, eating at the table behind her in the deli (maybe this would have been realistic) and shopping at the high end Midtown department store she worked at (unlikely that there were many black women shopping at such a place in the 1950s). If Midge was a real person, she probably could have gone through most of her life without seeing a black person at all.
Also, has anyone noticed the glut of TV ads over the past year featuring black/white couples? There are many such couples in real life but it seems a little overly representative and forced.
Anonymous wrote:This is a movie where people burst in song and fly. And you think a black lawyer is unrealistic?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It's a friggin Disney movie for crying out loud not a History Channel documentary.
If your fictional movie is set in a certain time and place, and it portrays people and things that are anachronistic, then it is simply badly done.
If a movie set in 1930s London had flying cars and cell phones, would you say "this is a fictional movie not a documentary fer chrissake"? No, you would say "this is stupid and distracting".