Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd love to know what goes in to prepping the teachers to push back. We've only had one IEP meeting, but all through my child's 8 years we've heard all sorts of complaints from teachers about lack of focus, etc. All of the supporting documentation and professional observation going into the IEP meeting supported this, and many conversations with the teacher about the problem (initiated by her, because there was a problem) and we sat there during the IEP as she told everyone in the room my son had zero issues. My blood still boils thinking about it as we were told we need a neuropsych before they'd approve anything. What do the families who can't afford a neuropsych do?
What you don't realize is that if there is a suspected disability that may be interfering with the student's ability to access to curriculum, and THE SCHOOL says a neuropsych is needed to diagnose that disability... the school must pay for that evaluation.
You can refuse to agree with the eligibility determination document/IEP draft and tell the school you're taking them to due process for refusing to properly evaluate your child. Their tune will change real fast.
Of course, if the student is doing well academically, socially and emotionally, it'll be hard to prove your case in due process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I definitely felt a little guilty (maybe a lot?) when I got the first IEP. Because I knew that I had done it in part because I am trained to interpret laws and regulations, and make very strong arguments. And I also knew that I had done it in part to cope with a bad school that we had previously enrolled in. I also felt surprised at the amount of services that we got (10 hrs push in special ed plus good related services) and I felt sorta, kinda, like I was "that mom" pathologizing her normal child.
At the end of the day I actually felt confident about my argument and like it was the right thing to do, but I felt guilty that I got something via my personal skills, that other equally needy parents don't. This is one reason I try to chime in on this board to share wisdom!
Also as time has gone by, I feel like I was very smart and prescient to get a strong IEP. I truly believe it helped smooth the path for my DS, who is now really thriving academically and has not had behavioral issues. But, I do still have residual guilt, because I have no doubt that similarly needy kids would not have gotten the same.
Op again. I don’t know the exact lingo for the program he is in. He’s going to be mainstreamed in an inclusive classroom but have a sped teacher with him (and three other kids) for about 5-6 hours per day. I knew 2 hours was too little. I knew self-contained was not right either. This program was never told to me or offered to me. It was literally through hours of internet digging and then a call to the county sped coordinator to confirm it existed and there was space available. I feel like I “found out” about their special little program and they are upset with me!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I definitely felt a little guilty (maybe a lot?) when I got the first IEP. Because I knew that I had done it in part because I am trained to interpret laws and regulations, and make very strong arguments. And I also knew that I had done it in part to cope with a bad school that we had previously enrolled in. I also felt surprised at the amount of services that we got (10 hrs push in special ed plus good related services) and I felt sorta, kinda, like I was "that mom" pathologizing her normal child.
At the end of the day I actually felt confident about my argument and like it was the right thing to do, but I felt guilty that I got something via my personal skills, that other equally needy parents don't. This is one reason I try to chime in on this board to share wisdom!
Also as time has gone by, I feel like I was very smart and prescient to get a strong IEP. I truly believe it helped smooth the path for my DS, who is now really thriving academically and has not had behavioral issues. But, I do still have residual guilt, because I have no doubt that similarly needy kids would not have gotten the same.
Op again. I don’t know the exact lingo for the program he is in. He’s going to be mainstreamed in an inclusive classroom but have a sped teacher with him (and three other kids) for about 5-6 hours per day. I knew 2 hours was too little. I knew self-contained was not right either. This program was never told to me or offered to me. It was literally through hours of internet digging and then a call to the county sped coordinator to confirm it existed and there was space available. I feel like I “found out” about their special little program and they are upset with me!
It sounds from your post like the result of your efforts was that 3 other kids also benefit from this service! If that is the case how about giving yourself a huge pat on the back for helping them as well!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd love to know what goes in to prepping the teachers to push back. We've only had one IEP meeting, but all through my child's 8 years we've heard all sorts of complaints from teachers about lack of focus, etc. All of the supporting documentation and professional observation going into the IEP meeting supported this, and many conversations with the teacher about the problem (initiated by her, because there was a problem) and we sat there during the IEP as she told everyone in the room my son had zero issues. My blood still boils thinking about it as we were told we need a neuropsych before they'd approve anything. What do the families who can't afford a neuropsych do?
What you don't realize is that if there is a suspected disability that may be interfering with the student's ability to access to curriculum, and THE SCHOOL says a neuropsych is needed to diagnose that disability... the school must pay for that evaluation.
You can refuse to agree with the eligibility determination document/IEP draft and tell the school you're taking them to due process for refusing to properly evaluate your child. Their tune will change real fast.
Of course, if the student is doing well academically, socially and emotionally, it'll be hard to prove your case in due process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I definitely felt a little guilty (maybe a lot?) when I got the first IEP. Because I knew that I had done it in part because I am trained to interpret laws and regulations, and make very strong arguments. And I also knew that I had done it in part to cope with a bad school that we had previously enrolled in. I also felt surprised at the amount of services that we got (10 hrs push in special ed plus good related services) and I felt sorta, kinda, like I was "that mom" pathologizing her normal child.
At the end of the day I actually felt confident about my argument and like it was the right thing to do, but I felt guilty that I got something via my personal skills, that other equally needy parents don't. This is one reason I try to chime in on this board to share wisdom!
Also as time has gone by, I feel like I was very smart and prescient to get a strong IEP. I truly believe it helped smooth the path for my DS, who is now really thriving academically and has not had behavioral issues. But, I do still have residual guilt, because I have no doubt that similarly needy kids would not have gotten the same.
Op again. I don’t know the exact lingo for the program he is in. He’s going to be mainstreamed in an inclusive classroom but have a sped teacher with him (and three other kids) for about 5-6 hours per day. I knew 2 hours was too little. I knew self-contained was not right either. This program was never told to me or offered to me. It was literally through hours of internet digging and then a call to the county sped coordinator to confirm it existed and there was space available. I feel like I “found out” about their special little program and they are upset with me!
Anonymous wrote:I'd love to know what goes in to prepping the teachers to push back. We've only had one IEP meeting, but all through my child's 8 years we've heard all sorts of complaints from teachers about lack of focus, etc. All of the supporting documentation and professional observation going into the IEP meeting supported this, and many conversations with the teacher about the problem (initiated by her, because there was a problem) and we sat there during the IEP as she told everyone in the room my son had zero issues. My blood still boils thinking about it as we were told we need a neuropsych before they'd approve anything. What do the families who can't afford a neuropsych do?
Anonymous wrote:So I definitely felt a little guilty (maybe a lot?) when I got the first IEP. Because I knew that I had done it in part because I am trained to interpret laws and regulations, and make very strong arguments. And I also knew that I had done it in part to cope with a bad school that we had previously enrolled in. I also felt surprised at the amount of services that we got (10 hrs push in special ed plus good related services) and I felt sorta, kinda, like I was "that mom" pathologizing her normal child.
At the end of the day I actually felt confident about my argument and like it was the right thing to do, but I felt guilty that I got something via my personal skills, that other equally needy parents don't. This is one reason I try to chime in on this board to share wisdom!
Also as time has gone by, I feel like I was very smart and prescient to get a strong IEP. I truly believe it helped smooth the path for my DS, who is now really thriving academically and has not had behavioral issues. But, I do still have residual guilt, because I have no doubt that similarly needy kids would not have gotten the same.
Anonymous wrote:I'd love to know what goes in to prepping the teachers to push back. We've only had one IEP meeting, but all through my child's 8 years we've heard all sorts of complaints from teachers about lack of focus, etc. All of the supporting documentation and professional observation going into the IEP meeting supported this, and many conversations with the teacher about the problem (initiated by her, because there was a problem) and we sat there during the IEP as she told everyone in the room my son had zero issues. My blood still boils thinking about it as we were told we need a neuropsych before they'd approve anything. What do the families who can't afford a neuropsych do?
Anonymous wrote:"Public schools really need to stick to the "least restrictive environment" component to IDEA.
As a related service provider, I can tell you that many families don't want their kid taken away from regular ed peers while others feel like more hours will result in more progress (not always in my experience).
I have worked for MCPS, DCPS and PGCPS and never have I experienced special ed teams trying to give minimal services.
Just last week we met about a kid who has scored in the low end of average for all areas but kept his services in place because we thought the progress was because of the supports but we also want him to be in the classroom as much as possible as his abilities increase, so it is a careful balance.
Trust me, educators want kids to learn.
If anything, we try to make sure kids who aren't progressing are placed in appropriate programs but those decisions are made at higher levels"
You obviously have never worked with twice exceptional students. Trust me, educators don't care if kids don't learn so long as they can score at minimally acceptable levels so that the school's numbers don't look bad. I have never once, in 8 years of advocating for my child, heard an educator say "oh, we can't have him not be challenged. We'll make sure that we do something about that." Never. I have heard plenty of "oh, he doesn't need that - he's working at grade level."
Anonymous wrote:MCPS has one.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We wanted access to a program (which exists an
OP, is this a GT/LD program?
Wait- where are there GT/ LD programs?