Anonymous wrote:FCPS's curriculum has declined in general. I'm not sure it matters because I don't think most FCPS classes are taught at a very high level. Maybe an AP class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do the kids going to Madison from TMS seem to be well prepared for the writing and work load?
I think you are over-estimating how prepared one needs to be for honors classes at Madison. Seriously. My child was in honors at TMS. She is prepared just fine for honors classes at Madison. It's not some wildly advanced curriculum. Yes, it is high school, but the teachers understand that they are teaching 14 and 15 yr olds.... so they teach them what they expect them to do/know in class. There isn't some secret magic that the AAP kids get (at TMS or LJ) that dooms the non-AAP kids from getting A's in honors classes at Madison. If your kid wants to get good grades at Madison, he or she will put in the effort to do what the teacher asks, and will get good grades. This whole idea that some middle schools prepare you for Madison (or any FCPS high school) and some do not, is just silly.
Totally disagree with this. First, if a middle school has more homework, requires planning ahead and budgeting time, makes kids work for their grades, graders harder, has higher expectations, or teachers a higher level curriculum, that has to - and does - help in high school. My friend is a teacher at Madison and said she can tell which ones went to LJ and which went to Thoreau. She said, by far, the Thoreau students were not used to more rigorous grading and expectations, their writing was inferior and they complained more about the amount of work. Yes, a kid who cares about his grade, will do so regardless of the school, but that doesn’t negate the fact that one middle school can better prepare you for high school than another.
—former teacher
How long ago did you have this conversation and did it account for fact that LJ kids at Madison were all AAP, and Thoreau students at Madison were mostly non AAP kids? That's changed now.
She’s mentioned it multiple times over the years. The last time she mentioned it was about a month and a half ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But the LJ kids are self selecting, too. The more serious, academic focused kids are more likely to choose LJ than the less academic focused kids who are smart, in AAP, but not all about academics. So when the Madison teachers see these kids what exactly are they comparing. Those kids going to LJ may have looked every bit as good if they had chosen to go to and spent two years at TMS.
Exactly. Many of those kids are now choosing Thoreau and even more will do so in the future as LJ's reputation declines, which is already happening.
Anonymous wrote:But the LJ kids are self selecting, too. The more serious, academic focused kids are more likely to choose LJ than the less academic focused kids who are smart, in AAP, but not all about academics. So when the Madison teachers see these kids what exactly are they comparing. Those kids going to LJ may have looked every bit as good if they had chosen to go to and spent two years at TMS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do the kids going to Madison from TMS seem to be well prepared for the writing and work load?
I think you are over-estimating how prepared one needs to be for honors classes at Madison. Seriously. My child was in honors at TMS. She is prepared just fine for honors classes at Madison. It's not some wildly advanced curriculum. Yes, it is high school, but the teachers understand that they are teaching 14 and 15 yr olds.... so they teach them what they expect them to do/know in class. There isn't some secret magic that the AAP kids get (at TMS or LJ) that dooms the non-AAP kids from getting A's in honors classes at Madison. If your kid wants to get good grades at Madison, he or she will put in the effort to do what the teacher asks, and will get good grades. This whole idea that some middle schools prepare you for Madison (or any FCPS high school) and some do not, is just silly.
Totally disagree with this. First, if a middle school has more homework, requires planning ahead and budgeting time, makes kids work for their grades, graders harder, has higher expectations, or teachers a higher level curriculum, that has to - and does - help in high school. My friend is a teacher at Madison and said she can tell which ones went to LJ and which went to Thoreau. She said, by far, the Thoreau students were not used to more rigorous grading and expectations, their writing was inferior and they complained more about the amount of work. Yes, a kid who cares about his grade, will do so regardless of the school, but that doesn’t negate the fact that one middle school can better prepare you for high school than another.
—former teacher
How long ago did you have this conversation and did it account for fact that LJ kids at Madison were all AAP, and Thoreau students at Madison were mostly non AAP kids? That's changed now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do the kids going to Madison from TMS seem to be well prepared for the writing and work load?
I think you are over-estimating how prepared one needs to be for honors classes at Madison. Seriously. My child was in honors at TMS. She is prepared just fine for honors classes at Madison. It's not some wildly advanced curriculum. Yes, it is high school, but the teachers understand that they are teaching 14 and 15 yr olds.... so they teach them what they expect them to do/know in class. There isn't some secret magic that the AAP kids get (at TMS or LJ) that dooms the non-AAP kids from getting A's in honors classes at Madison. If your kid wants to get good grades at Madison, he or she will put in the effort to do what the teacher asks, and will get good grades. This whole idea that some middle schools prepare you for Madison (or any FCPS high school) and some do not, is just silly.
Totally disagree with this. First, if a middle school has more homework, requires planning ahead and budgeting time, makes kids work for their grades, graders harder, has higher expectations, or teachers a higher level curriculum, that has to - and does - help in high school. My friend is a teacher at Madison and said she can tell which ones went to LJ and which went to Thoreau. She said, by far, the Thoreau students were not used to more rigorous grading and expectations, their writing was inferior and they complained more about the amount of work. Yes, a kid who cares about his grade, will do so regardless of the school, but that doesn’t negate the fact that one middle school can better prepare you for high school than another.
—former teacher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do the kids going to Madison from TMS seem to be well prepared for the writing and work load?
I think you are over-estimating how prepared one needs to be for honors classes at Madison. Seriously. My child was in honors at TMS. She is prepared just fine for honors classes at Madison. It's not some wildly advanced curriculum. Yes, it is high school, but the teachers understand that they are teaching 14 and 15 yr olds.... so they teach them what they expect them to do/know in class. There isn't some secret magic that the AAP kids get (at TMS or LJ) that dooms the non-AAP kids from getting A's in honors classes at Madison. If your kid wants to get good grades at Madison, he or she will put in the effort to do what the teacher asks, and will get good grades. This whole idea that some middle schools prepare you for Madison (or any FCPS high school) and some do not, is just silly.
Totally disagree with this. First, if a middle school has more homework, requires planning ahead and budgeting time, makes kids work for their grades, graders harder, has higher expectations, or teachers a higher level curriculum, that has to - and does - help in high school. My friend is a teacher at Madison and said she can tell which ones went to LJ and which went to Thoreau. She said, by far, the Thoreau students were not used to more rigorous grading and expectations, their writing was inferior and they complained more about the amount of work. Yes, a kid who cares about his grade, will do so regardless of the school, but that doesn’t negate the fact that one middle school can better prepare you for high school than another.
—former teacher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do the kids going to Madison from TMS seem to be well prepared for the writing and work load?
I think you are over-estimating how prepared one needs to be for honors classes at Madison. Seriously. My child was in honors at TMS. She is prepared just fine for honors classes at Madison. It's not some wildly advanced curriculum. Yes, it is high school, but the teachers understand that they are teaching 14 and 15 yr olds.... so they teach them what they expect them to do/know in class. There isn't some secret magic that the AAP kids get (at TMS or LJ) that dooms the non-AAP kids from getting A's in honors classes at Madison. If your kid wants to get good grades at Madison, he or she will put in the effort to do what the teacher asks, and will get good grades. This whole idea that some middle schools prepare you for Madison (or any FCPS high school) and some do not, is just silly.
Anonymous wrote:Do the kids going to Madison from TMS seem to be well prepared for the writing and work load?
Anonymous wrote:Do the kids going to Madison from TMS seem to be well prepared for the writing and work load?