Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You say he has an academic job? Is he an assistant professor, who will be working toward tenure for the next six years? I am a tenured prof, so I am surrounded by other academics, and I don't know a single male academic who was the default parent while working toward tenure. In fact, the most successful mid-career scholars in my field are the men whose wives SAH or have less-intense careers. The thing about academia is that the work is infinite, and the standards are vague. You could always collect just one more set of data, publish just one more article, etc., and you never feel like it's enough until you've got tenure. And then you're working toward full. I know there are a lot of jobs that you can never "turn off" but academia is unusual simply because the work is self-driven and limitless.
So, I'd be thinking about how he's going to resist that pressure to publish more and more and more and focus on running the household while you pursue your career.
The research shows that the most likely person to get tenure is a married male, the most unlikely is a married female. (Unmarried men and unmarried women fall in between.) The typical explanation for these differences is that men are successful because women are running their personal lives, and women are unsuccessful professionally because they're having to run their family life too.
So, is your husband going to step outside of these well established patterns in academia and somehow be a default parent and a successful scholar? There are certainly examples of men who have done it, but it takes commitment on their part to buck the dominant trends.
A man who only bring home scraps of bacon for his dutiful wife to cook up? Not attractive. If you are going to be a slave to your job you better bring in some money. otherwise you are just a selfish prick.
+1
More and more this is how I feel. It’s getting harder and harder not to see having kids in this marriage as a truly raw deal. I am still weighing it, but it is highly likely that I don’t have kids with him and we divorce in a few years when I feel that I am in solid financial footing. I may not meet someone else in time, but I am starting to feel at peace with that given how unattractive my current situation is to me. -OP
You seem generally unhappy now, and also haven't once expressed that you would really like to have a baby. I think that's the conversation you need to have with yourself - do you want to be a mother? If you do, then you need to figure out how that happens.
A baby certainly isn't going to make your marriage easier or better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You say he has an academic job? Is he an assistant professor, who will be working toward tenure for the next six years? I am a tenured prof, so I am surrounded by other academics, and I don't know a single male academic who was the default parent while working toward tenure. In fact, the most successful mid-career scholars in my field are the men whose wives SAH or have less-intense careers. The thing about academia is that the work is infinite, and the standards are vague. You could always collect just one more set of data, publish just one more article, etc., and you never feel like it's enough until you've got tenure. And then you're working toward full. I know there are a lot of jobs that you can never "turn off" but academia is unusual simply because the work is self-driven and limitless.
So, I'd be thinking about how he's going to resist that pressure to publish more and more and more and focus on running the household while you pursue your career.
The research shows that the most likely person to get tenure is a married male, the most unlikely is a married female. (Unmarried men and unmarried women fall in between.) The typical explanation for these differences is that men are successful because women are running their personal lives, and women are unsuccessful professionally because they're having to run their family life too.
So, is your husband going to step outside of these well established patterns in academia and somehow be a default parent and a successful scholar? There are certainly examples of men who have done it, but it takes commitment on their part to buck the dominant trends.
A man who only bring home scraps of bacon for his dutiful wife to cook up? Not attractive. If you are going to be a slave to your job you better bring in some money. otherwise you are just a selfish prick.
+1
More and more this is how I feel. It’s getting harder and harder not to see having kids in this marriage as a truly raw deal. I am still weighing it, but it is highly likely that I don’t have kids with him and we divorce in a few years when I feel that I am in solid financial footing. I may not meet someone else in time, but I am starting to feel at peace with that given how unattractive my current situation is to me. -OP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You say he has an academic job? Is he an assistant professor, who will be working toward tenure for the next six years? I am a tenured prof, so I am surrounded by other academics, and I don't know a single male academic who was the default parent while working toward tenure. In fact, the most successful mid-career scholars in my field are the men whose wives SAH or have less-intense careers. The thing about academia is that the work is infinite, and the standards are vague. You could always collect just one more set of data, publish just one more article, etc., and you never feel like it's enough until you've got tenure. And then you're working toward full. I know there are a lot of jobs that you can never "turn off" but academia is unusual simply because the work is self-driven and limitless.
So, I'd be thinking about how he's going to resist that pressure to publish more and more and more and focus on running the household while you pursue your career.
The research shows that the most likely person to get tenure is a married male, the most unlikely is a married female. (Unmarried men and unmarried women fall in between.) The typical explanation for these differences is that men are successful because women are running their personal lives, and women are unsuccessful professionally because they're having to run their family life too.
So, is your husband going to step outside of these well established patterns in academia and somehow be a default parent and a successful scholar? There are certainly examples of men who have done it, but it takes commitment on their part to buck the dominant trends.
A man who only bring home scraps of bacon for his dutiful wife to cook up? Not attractive. If you are going to be a slave to your job you better bring in some money. otherwise you are just a selfish prick.
+1
More and more this is how I feel. It’s getting harder and harder not to see having kids in this marriage as a truly raw deal. I am still weighing it, but it is highly likely that I don’t have kids with him and we divorce in a few years when I feel that I am in solid financial footing. I may not meet someone else in time, but I am starting to feel at peace with that given how unattractive my current situation is to me. -OP
Doing the job thing is easier when children are younger, you can find care to cover things relatively easily - nanny should be the ideal in this situation since DH has a job that will likely have odd hours. It also takes a year or so to have a kid. DW needs to understand the DH will do things differently than she would have, but if everyone is alive and somewhat happy at the end of the day/week/month. It will work. Getting a house cleaner helps quite a bit too. DW also has to be okay with smaller amounts of time she will have with the child and that feeling will likely change once the child is born. It will may be very difficult for her.Anonymous wrote:Long story short:
DW was a trailing spouse for first part of marriage for much longer than anticipated. Now DH has his desired job (academic), and DW is trying to get her career back on track after 4 years of disjointed work and freelancing. DW is 34, and it is time to have a baby, but DW doesn't want to permanently tank the possibility of a decent paying career. Therefore, DW wants DH to take on at minimum 50% childcare responsibilities while she tries to get promoted and work her way up the corporate ladder to a middle manager level. DH claims to be on board, but DW is concerned that in practice things will fall apart, in large part because she reads all of the sob stories on this board.
What say you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You say he has an academic job? Is he an assistant professor, who will be working toward tenure for the next six years? I am a tenured prof, so I am surrounded by other academics, and I don't know a single male academic who was the default parent while working toward tenure. In fact, the most successful mid-career scholars in my field are the men whose wives SAH or have less-intense careers. The thing about academia is that the work is infinite, and the standards are vague. You could always collect just one more set of data, publish just one more article, etc., and you never feel like it's enough until you've got tenure. And then you're working toward full. I know there are a lot of jobs that you can never "turn off" but academia is unusual simply because the work is self-driven and limitless.
So, I'd be thinking about how he's going to resist that pressure to publish more and more and more and focus on running the household while you pursue your career.
The research shows that the most likely person to get tenure is a married male, the most unlikely is a married female. (Unmarried men and unmarried women fall in between.) The typical explanation for these differences is that men are successful because women are running their personal lives, and women are unsuccessful professionally because they're having to run their family life too.
So, is your husband going to step outside of these well established patterns in academia and somehow be a default parent and a successful scholar? There are certainly examples of men who have done it, but it takes commitment on their part to buck the dominant trends.
A man who only bring home scraps of bacon for his dutiful wife to cook up? Not attractive. If you are going to be a slave to your job you better bring in some money. otherwise you are just a selfish prick.
Anonymous wrote:You say he has an academic job? Is he an assistant professor, who will be working toward tenure for the next six years? I am a tenured prof, so I am surrounded by other academics, and I don't know a single male academic who was the default parent while working toward tenure. In fact, the most successful mid-career scholars in my field are the men whose wives SAH or have less-intense careers. The thing about academia is that the work is infinite, and the standards are vague. You could always collect just one more set of data, publish just one more article, etc., and you never feel like it's enough until you've got tenure. And then you're working toward full. I know there are a lot of jobs that you can never "turn off" but academia is unusual simply because the work is self-driven and limitless.
So, I'd be thinking about how he's going to resist that pressure to publish more and more and more and focus on running the household while you pursue your career.
The research shows that the most likely person to get tenure is a married male, the most unlikely is a married female. (Unmarried men and unmarried women fall in between.) The typical explanation for these differences is that men are successful because women are running their personal lives, and women are unsuccessful professionally because they're having to run their family life too.
So, is your husband going to step outside of these well established patterns in academia and somehow be a default parent and a successful scholar? There are certainly examples of men who have done it, but it takes commitment on their part to buck the dominant trends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After showing up at the wrong place at the wrong time on the wrong day multiple times she will take over all family planning chores and he will claim she is controlling.
She will do 75%, he will do 25% but in his mind it will be 50/50.
Yeah, it will be 75/25 after she deletes all credit for anything he does, and gives herself double credit for what she does (plus triple credit for all the made-up bullshit like "emotional labor").
It will be 75% when he thinks moving the clothes from the washer to the dryer is = to folding and putting it away.
It will be 75% when he thinks showing up to the school play is = to making the costume for the play
Men's math is historically bad.
+1. There's a SAHD in a SAHP group I'm in, and even without working he can't handle running a household. His wife had to hire a nanny to take care of the kids with him.
Jeez, that's pathetic. I'm a DH and what I accomplish in one hour, it would take multiple hours for my DW. And I do all the cooking (and cleanup).
Yes, there are many Dads out there like me because I know them.
Anonymous wrote:Long story short:
DW was a trailing spouse for first part of marriage for much longer than anticipated. Now DH has his desired job (academic), and DW is trying to get her career back on track after 4 years of disjointed work and freelancing. DW is 34, and it is time to have a baby, but DW doesn't want to permanently tank the possibility of a decent paying career. Therefore, DW wants DH to take on at minimum 50% childcare responsibilities while she tries to get promoted and work her way up the corporate ladder to a middle manager level. DH claims to be on board, but DW is concerned that in practice things will fall apart, in large part because she reads all of the sob stories on this board.
What say you?
Anonymous wrote:I say in less it is what HE wants you are setting yourself up for an issue. I think you should hire a nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After showing up at the wrong place at the wrong time on the wrong day multiple times she will take over all family planning chores and he will claim she is controlling.
She will do 75%, he will do 25% but in his mind it will be 50/50.
Yeah, it will be 75/25 after she deletes all credit for anything he does, and gives herself double credit for what she does (plus triple credit for all the made-up bullshit like "emotional labor").[/quote]
LOL!!! totally true!!!!! I love it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You say he has an academic job? Is he an assistant professor, who will be working toward tenure for the next six years? I am a tenured prof, so I am surrounded by other academics, and I don't know a single male academic who was the default parent while working toward tenure. In fact, the most successful mid-career scholars in my field are the men whose wives SAH or have less-intense careers. The thing about academia is that the work is infinite, and the standards are vague. You could always collect just one more set of data, publish just one more article, etc., and you never feel like it's enough until you've got tenure. And then you're working toward full. I know there are a lot of jobs that you can never "turn off" but academia is unusual simply because the work is self-driven and limitless.
So, I'd be thinking about how he's going to resist that pressure to publish more and more and more and focus on running the household while you pursue your career.
The research shows that the most likely person to get tenure is a married male, the most unlikely is a married female. (Unmarried men and unmarried women fall in between.) The typical explanation for these differences is that men are successful because women are running their personal lives, and women are unsuccessful professionally because they're having to run their family life too.
So, is your husband going to step outside of these well established patterns in academia and somehow be a default parent and a successful scholar? There are certainly examples of men who have done it, but it takes commitment on their part to buck the dominant trends.
Yes he is an assistant professor. I have a hard time with the idea of keeping a light career to support an academic career which frankly is not very lucrative. He claims he can easily work until 70 at top pay, but this does not help me sleep at night. What if he gets sick?
He plans to go for tenure at the end of next year if he gets an NSF grant, and has been encouraged to go early by the department. He is 36 and has many, many publications and citations. What he doesn’t have yet is a big grant.
Anyway, i can outearn him fairly soon if I am not mommy tracked, and this matters to me because I highly value financial security.
Oof. An academic who is trying to get NSF grants? That is not the kind of scholar who can usually achieve work-life balance. If he wants to convince you that he could be the default parent, I’d ask him to describe 2-3 scholars who he admires who prioritize their families. Ask him really concrete questions about how they structure their work lives to do things like drop offs and pick ups, how often they travel for conferences/lectures/research, etc., and then ask him how he would do the same things. He needs to think really concretely about how he would detach from his work enough to raise kids.
FTR, you’re totally right that academia is not remunerative enough to merit the hours many people put into it. But it’s a calling for some people. Anyone who made the financial sacrifices to go into academia probably isn’t going to immediately recognize the sense in scaling back his own career so that his spouse can boost the HHI.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You say he has an academic job? Is he an assistant professor, who will be working toward tenure for the next six years? I am a tenured prof, so I am surrounded by other academics, and I don't know a single male academic who was the default parent while working toward tenure. In fact, the most successful mid-career scholars in my field are the men whose wives SAH or have less-intense careers. The thing about academia is that the work is infinite, and the standards are vague. You could always collect just one more set of data, publish just one more article, etc., and you never feel like it's enough until you've got tenure. And then you're working toward full. I know there are a lot of jobs that you can never "turn off" but academia is unusual simply because the work is self-driven and limitless.
So, I'd be thinking about how he's going to resist that pressure to publish more and more and more and focus on running the household while you pursue your career.
The research shows that the most likely person to get tenure is a married male, the most unlikely is a married female. (Unmarried men and unmarried women fall in between.) The typical explanation for these differences is that men are successful because women are running their personal lives, and women are unsuccessful professionally because they're having to run their family life too.
So, is your husband going to step outside of these well established patterns in academia and somehow be a default parent and a successful scholar? There are certainly examples of men who have done it, but it takes commitment on their part to buck the dominant trends.
Yes he is an assistant professor. I have a hard time with the idea of keeping a light career to support an academic career which frankly is not very lucrative. He claims he can easily work until 70 at top pay, but this does not help me sleep at night. What if he gets sick?
He plans to go for tenure at the end of next year if he gets an NSF grant, and has been encouraged to go early by the department. He is 36 and has many, many publications and citations. What he doesn’t have yet is a big grant.
Anyway, i can outearn him fairly soon if I am not mommy tracked, and this matters to me because I highly value financial security.