Anonymous wrote:Now gays from Massachusetts and California don't have to travel a thousand miles or more to an obscure county in Kentucky they'd never otherwise go to to get denied a marriage license.

It's truly a victory for civil rights.

You don’t think there are gay people in Kentucky??

Anonymous wrote:Now gays from Massachusetts and California don't have to travel a thousand miles or more to an obscure county in Kentucky they'd never otherwise go to to get denied a marriage license.

It's truly a victory for civil rights.

Believe it or not, Republicans haven't managed to exile all gay people to San Francisco yet. If you can't see them, it's because they keep quiet out of fear.

Update: she just lost again.

Anonymous wrote:Bigots just don’t understand the absurdity of having a woman who has been married four times and had two children out of wedlock as the protector of “the sanctity of marriage.”

“‘Til death is do part,” Kim.

+1. They don’t seem to get the absurdity that she had twins by her future second husband while married to her first husband. First husband thought they were his. What a thing to do. That is off the chart not a moral thing to do. Then she holds herself up as someone superior to a loving Gay couple.