Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 11:13     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
Okay, I think that you re right about Gal Gadot, but that is a terrible photo of her. Agree on Angelina, too. But Anne Hathaway? Her eyes are kind of creepily buggy to me. I have no idea who those other actresses are, although the last one might be Salma?

Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 10:40     Subject: Re:Mediocre Hollywood women
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who DO you find attractive?
















Real beauty doesn’t need an explanation.



Is there a reason you included photos from the 90s versus how most of these actresses look now? Your "dislike" photos are current.
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 10:38     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
Anonymous wrote:Kristen bell is genuinely talented. Including her really undermines your list.
The rest are fine.
Blake Lively is California beautiful. I don’t find her interesting but whatever.
I think Emma Watson is very photogenic- not a fan of her acting, but I like her personally. That goes a long way.
Jennifer Aniston just has something about her. I remember seeing her in a B movie when she was just starting out. She has an it factor. She stood out.



Agree with all go this, especially on Aniston. She definitely has the "it" factor, and tremendous comedic timing. She also is a more than capable dramatic actress, was excellent in Good Girl, Cake, and The Yellow Birds. She's never claimed to be a great beauty, and neither has Kristen Bell. They are both talented imo.
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 10:33     Subject: Re:Mediocre Hollywood women
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Umm Blake Likely is a golden goddess...and I say this as someone who does think Emma Watson is mediocre she just happened to turn her Harry Potter lead role into multi-film success.


Blake is just a tall blonde. How many tall blondes are walking around the mall?


Not many, blonde hair is relatively rare. Where do you live that you see so much blonde hair?

LOL, she's not naturally blonde. Check out her roots in OP's pic. We have like 50% bottle blondes here in DC. I don't understand why so many women dye their hair blonde. Boring AF.


Lively is probably blonde with an assist. Kristen Bell is all bottle.

And if you go to the Midwest, you will find the natural blondes in their native habitat.


And? DC is like 50% AA, even if there are a bunch of bottle blondes point is you aren't seeing a ton of blondes who are also tall (bottle or not). OP's lame point is obviously not even true. She just wants to whine like a bitter Betty and exaggerate. She's being ridiculous.
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 10:24     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
Anonymous wrote:That nose on Hathaway!


You mean one of the few not surgically altered? You're right, ridiculous!
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 10:22     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
Anonymous wrote:What causes someone to even post a thread like this? So much insecurity.


Agreed. This thread is ridiculous and pathetic.
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 10:10     Subject: Re:Mediocre Hollywood women
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Umm Blake Likely is a golden goddess...and I say this as someone who does think Emma Watson is mediocre she just happened to turn her Harry Potter lead role into multi-film success.


Blake is just a tall blonde. How many tall blondes are walking around the mall?


Not many, blonde hair is relatively rare. Where do you live that you see so much blonde hair?

LOL, she's not naturally blonde. Check out her roots in OP's pic. We have like 50% bottle blondes here in DC. I don't understand why so many women dye their hair blonde. Boring AF.


Lively is probably blonde with an assist. Kristen Bell is all bottle.

And if you go to the Midwest, you will find the natural blondes in their native habitat.
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 10:04     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
What causes someone to even post a thread like this? So much insecurity.
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 10:02     Subject: Re:Mediocre Hollywood women
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow, OP. I think all of the women you posted are beautiful.


I totally agree with OP. And - I'd like to add - I wish I had written her post.

Why?
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 10:00     Subject: Re:Mediocre Hollywood women
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Umm Blake Likely is a golden goddess...and I say this as someone who does think Emma Watson is mediocre she just happened to turn her Harry Potter lead role into multi-film success.


Blake is just a tall blonde. How many tall blondes are walking around the mall?


Not many, blonde hair is relatively rare. Where do you live that you see so much blonde hair?

LOL, she's not naturally blonde. Check out her roots in OP's pic. We have like 50% bottle blondes here in DC. I don't understand why so many women dye their hair blonde. Boring AF.
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 09:35     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
Imagine what you looked like on your wedding day. In great shape professional hair and make up etc. Then imagine it is your job to look like that every day. The vast majority of Hollywood actresses look totally normal day to day.
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 09:32     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
Kate Hudson
Blake lively
Katherine Heigl
Margot robbie
Gwyneth Paltrow
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 08:41     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
Emma Watson just got lucky by being cast as Hermione Granger.

I agree that she's not the best actress in the world (she was not good in Beauty and the Beast) but how do you quantify a thing like luck? She's ok enough as an actress to get by, which, combined with her fame, allows her to nab plum roles.
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 08:36     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
Okay, we get it. Blondes are shitty and brunettes are the poo.

What about your stand on redheads? Any crimes against humanity for them?
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2018 08:31     Subject: Mediocre Hollywood women
I think Kristen Bell and Jennifer Aniston have talent -- especially good comic timing.