when they quit biglaw to go into lower paid government workAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:actually women in bigkaw tend to not marry because there isn’t anyone for them to marry up toAnonymous wrote:This forum is full of MRAs fantasizing about what it would be like to be high income. At my job, in biglaw, there are (obviously) many high income women. Most of the women have high income spouses. Some have SAH spouses. Most of the men have working wives. All of them would find this imagined dynamic of the shrew SAHW threatening a man with a frying pan if he quits completely foreign.
"Actually..."
Jeez. Do you even know any women? I am starting to think that you do not. Almost every woman lawyer I know is married. Most of them to other lawyers.
Anonymous wrote:actually women in bigkaw tend to not marry because there isn’t anyone for them to marry up toAnonymous wrote:This forum is full of MRAs fantasizing about what it would be like to be high income. At my job, in biglaw, there are (obviously) many high income women. Most of the women have high income spouses. Some have SAH spouses. Most of the men have working wives. All of them would find this imagined dynamic of the shrew SAHW threatening a man with a frying pan if he quits completely foreign.
Anonymous wrote:actually women in bigkaw tend to not marry because there isn’t anyone for them to marry up toAnonymous wrote:This forum is full of MRAs fantasizing about what it would be like to be high income. At my job, in biglaw, there are (obviously) many high income women. Most of the women have high income spouses. Some have SAH spouses. Most of the men have working wives. All of them would find this imagined dynamic of the shrew SAHW threatening a man with a frying pan if he quits completely foreign.
actually women in bigkaw tend to not marry because there isn’t anyone for them to marry up toAnonymous wrote:This forum is full of MRAs fantasizing about what it would be like to be high income. At my job, in biglaw, there are (obviously) many high income women. Most of the women have high income spouses. Some have SAH spouses. Most of the men have working wives. All of them would find this imagined dynamic of the shrew SAHW threatening a man with a frying pan if he quits completely foreign.
Anonymous wrote:and if she divorces you if you say no or cheats on you?Anonymous wrote:You can say no, correct?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't you want the best paying job possible for your family?
Well, the best paying job I could get right now would pay about $5-600k, but would require 50% travel and routinely working 70-hour weeks. I have decided to stay at my $3-400k job that requires only 20% travel and 50-hour weeks. Do you really think the better paying job would be better for my family? My kids are 2 and 4.
OK that's a huge difference than someone taking the easy 50k job vs hustling for the 100k job. In your case, 3-400k should be enough to support a family.
and if she divorces you if you say no or cheats on you?Anonymous wrote:You can say no, correct?
Anonymous wrote:Lol pointing out your wife has gained 100 lbs is misogyny
Anonymous wrote:be honest, you’d say him noticing she has gained 100 lbs in the two years they’ve been married as being abuseAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:say if she threatened to leave you if you don’t work a job you hate? Not abuse?Anonymous wrote:This is ridiculous. No one can pressure you into working a job you do not want to work. If your spouse is insisting that you take a job you don't want, that's a jerk move, but it's not "abuse." If your spouse beats you or threatens to beat you if you do not take a job you don't want, that's abuse. You can go on and on and on about emotional abuse, but in every situation I've seen where one partner works a high-paying stressful job to support the family, there is at least some discussion of that and agreement about who the breadwinner will be.
If you find that you are in a situation where your spouse is pressuring you to work at a job you don't like in order to subsidize their lifestyle while not contributing financially themselves, I would suggest that you consider divorcing this selfish person.
I think it's mean and manipulative. As someone who works with actual survivors of domestic abuse, I think it it frankly laughable that you are calling a wife who threatens to leave you if you only make $300k instead of $700k "abusive."
Listen, there is economic coercion that certainly happens. By and large, it happens to women who are employed in low-skill, low-pay fields such as childcare, housekeeping, the maquiladoras in Juarez, etc. There are plenty of people who are forced by their spouses to work with threats of violence, social consequences, etc.
What you are describing is a materialist who doesn't respect you. Please do not put yourself in the same category as the women who are forced to work by abusive husbands under threat of violence against them or their children.