Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My super stat DD is at our state flagship honors college. There's no doubt that if we had been full pay she would be somewhere else - first she could have applied ED at her top choice and we also could have applied some places we didn't - think top 20-30 - and some of the rejections and waitlists likely would have fallen the other way. I can tell by the admits from the public HS she attended - there's no doubt. Frankly, the data shows that she would have been much better off being a star athlete that a star academic.
It breaks my heart a little bit as she earned it I just couldn't afford it. And in the life the social connections of those schools to which she was not admitted will matter but I also believe in my daughter and that she will bloom where she is planted. And I think she will be alot less cuddled so in early 20's when she is starting her career she will be formidable and I believe hiring managers will see that. It's a matter of getting those first interviews but as they say persistence beats resistance. And if she decides on med school well then we be grateful we didn't take out the undergraduate loans.
That said, perhaps sour grapes, but there is a certain sense of entitlement/privilege that I sense in the original poster. Full pay is a hook and ED is the filter.
You know the research shows she will do just as well as if she had gone to the more expensive choice?
Anonymous wrote:No sour grapes, I bet, just a notion that maybe we DMV parents all have a Lake Woebegone-style belief about our kids.
What percentage of the class do you think should get into the state flagship?

Anonymous wrote:Full Pay is definitely a hook==but like most privileges, it is invisible to the person benefiting from it. I saw this a lot last year. But the parents involved just think their kid was superior.
Anonymous wrote:Full Pay is definitely a hook==but like most privileges, it is invisible to the person benefiting from it. I saw this a lot last year. But the parents involved just think their kid was superior.
Anonymous wrote:I have said this before on here, but one of my best HS friends was a top stats, top math and science classes - many AP classes and extraordinarily talented at arts - she got into none of her reaches or matches, only her single safety, Boston University. She transferred out after her 1st year to RISD and is now a professor in her subject. But she was considered the "cream" and she most definitely took a longer time to rise to the top and not directly.
Shit happens, and its not always predictable.
Anonymous wrote:Full Pay is definitely a hook==but like most privileges, it is invisible to the person benefiting from it. I saw this a lot last year. But the parents involved just think their kid was superior.
!Anonymous wrote:I've never seen a rockstar kid who busted their butt all 4 years shut out from an elite college. The biggest "drop" I've seen are like rockstar kids obsessed with Harvard who end up at Cornell or Chicago.
Anonymous wrote:My super stat DD is at our state flagship honors college. There's no doubt that if we had been full pay she would be somewhere else - first she could have applied ED at her top choice and we also could have applied some places we didn't - think top 20-30 - and some of the rejections and waitlists likely would have fallen the other way. I can tell by the admits from the public HS she attended - there's no doubt. Frankly, the data shows that she would have been much better off being a star athlete that a star academic.
It breaks my heart a little bit as she earned it I just couldn't afford it. And in the life the social connections of those schools to which she was not admitted will matter but I also believe in my daughter and that she will bloom where she is planted. And I think she will be alot less cuddled so in early 20's when she is starting her career she will be formidable and I believe hiring managers will see that. It's a matter of getting those first interviews but as they say persistence beats resistance. And if she decides on med school well then we be grateful we didn't take out the undergraduate loans.
That said, perhaps sour grapes, but there is a certain sense of entitlement/privilege that I sense in the original poster. Full pay is a hook and ED is the filter.
Anonymous wrote:My super stat DD is at our state flagship honors college. There's no doubt that if we had been full pay she would be somewhere else - first she could have applied ED at her top choice and we also could have applied some places we didn't - think top 20-30 - and some of the rejections and waitlists likely would have fallen the other way. I can tell by the admits from the public HS she attended - there's no doubt. Frankly, the data shows that she would have been much better off being a star athlete that a star academic.
It breaks my heart a little bit as she earned it I just couldn't afford it. And in the life the social connections of those schools to which she was not admitted will matter but I also believe in my daughter and that she will bloom where she is planted. And I think she will be alot less cuddled so in early 20's when she is starting her career she will be formidable and I believe hiring managers will see that. It's a matter of getting those first interviews but as they say persistence beats resistance. And if she decides on med school well then we be grateful we didn't take out the undergraduate loans.
That said, perhaps sour grapes, but there is a certain sense of entitlement/privilege that I sense in the original poster. Full pay is a hook and ED is the filter.