Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I say it depends on how you define "drive".
If you're moving, then I take issue with that. That's a problem. That's compromising safety.
If you're sitting in traffic, crawling and stopping over and over... that's not driving. That's moving a few feet every minute.
My commute is 3 miles. But traffic is horrendous. It can sometimes take 45'minutes to go THREE miles. I only drive it during bad weather or when I'm going someplace right after work, the est of the time I bike if I'm in a hurry, or I walk.
But I refuse to accept that me texting or doing anything else on my phone is a danger to anyone when I'm sitting in traffic having not moved for four minutes.
These stupid zero tolerance policies are just as dumb as the ones they have for kids in school, where a 14 year old girl gets suspended for "drug possession" because she has Midol.
It's stupid.
I was rear-ended in my car while pregnant by a woman in stop and go traffic you described. Put your effing phone down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I say it depends on how you define "drive".
If you're moving, then I take issue with that. That's a problem. That's compromising safety.
If you're sitting in traffic, crawling and stopping over and over... that's not driving. That's moving a few feet every minute.
My commute is 3 miles. But traffic is horrendous. It can sometimes take 45'minutes to go THREE miles. I only drive it during bad weather or when I'm going someplace right after work, the est of the time I bike if I'm in a hurry, or I walk.
But I refuse to accept that me texting or doing anything else on my phone is a danger to anyone when I'm sitting in traffic having not moved for four minutes.
These stupid zero tolerance policies are just as dumb as the ones they have for kids in school, where a 14 year old girl gets suspended for "drug possession" because she has Midol.
It's stupid.
I was rear-ended in my car while pregnant by a woman in stop and go traffic you described. Put your effing phone down.
First of all, if you were rear ended, then the traffic was obviously moving at least intermittently. You have a right to be angry about that. I would be too. This isn't what I'm speaking of. My route puts me at several intersections where I don't move AT ALL for 4-6 minutes at a time. It's simply how the lights time out at that level of traffic volume. So I know I'll be siting in one spot, with my engine turned off, btw, for at least four minutes or more. That's when I text or check emails and do other stuff. Not while I'm crawling along, but when I'm stopped and not moving.
If you can't appreciate the difference in those two scenarios, then I'd suggest you're actively not doing so, looking to be angry.
Anonymous wrote:
It's not new, but it is really bad, and it won't stop until there's a successful campaign to treat people who text/phone while driving like drunk drivers.
Anonymous wrote:It’s awful, OP. The other day I was behind a driver on the beltway who had a video of something playing on her mounted phone while she was driving. I could not believe it. I just tried to get away from her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I say it depends on how you define "drive".
If you're moving, then I take issue with that. That's a problem. That's compromising safety.
If you're sitting in traffic, crawling and stopping over and over... that's not driving. That's moving a few feet every minute.
My commute is 3 miles. But traffic is horrendous. It can sometimes take 45'minutes to go THREE miles. I only drive it during bad weather or when I'm going someplace right after work, the est of the time I bike if I'm in a hurry, or I walk.
But I refuse to accept that me texting or doing anything else on my phone is a danger to anyone when I'm sitting in traffic having not moved for four minutes.
These stupid zero tolerance policies are just as dumb as the ones they have for kids in school, where a 14 year old girl gets suspended for "drug possession" because she has Midol.
It's stupid.
But it is, because of when you look up from your phone and start moving. You may refuse to accept that this is a danger, just as you may refuse to accept that summer in the Northern Hemisphere is the hotter season, but both are facts just the same. Please put your phone in the trunk when you're driving.
Anonymous wrote:
First of all, if you were rear ended, then the traffic was obviously moving at least intermittently. You have a right to be angry about that. I would be too. This isn't what I'm speaking of. My route puts me at several intersections where I don't move AT ALL for 4-6 minutes at a time. It's simply how the lights time out at that level of traffic volume. So I know I'll be siting in one spot, with my engine turned off, btw, for at least four minutes or more. That's when I text or check emails and do other stuff. Not while I'm crawling along, but when I'm stopped and not moving.
If you can't appreciate the difference in those two scenarios, then I'd suggest you're actively not doing so, looking to be angry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I say it depends on how you define "drive".
If you're moving, then I take issue with that. That's a problem. That's compromising safety.
If you're sitting in traffic, crawling and stopping over and over... that's not driving. That's moving a few feet every minute.
My commute is 3 miles. But traffic is horrendous. It can sometimes take 45'minutes to go THREE miles. I only drive it during bad weather or when I'm going someplace right after work, the est of the time I bike if I'm in a hurry, or I walk.
But I refuse to accept that me texting or doing anything else on my phone is a danger to anyone when I'm sitting in traffic having not moved for four minutes.
These stupid zero tolerance policies are just as dumb as the ones they have for kids in school, where a 14 year old girl gets suspended for "drug possession" because she has Midol.
It's stupid.
I was rear-ended in my car while pregnant by a woman in stop and go traffic you described. Put your effing phone down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where ya been?
It's the norm. 95% of the population texts and drives. This isn't new, OP.
It's not new, but it is really bad, and it won't stop until there's a successful campaign to treat people who text/phone while driving like drunk drivers.
Yes! What can an average citizen do to spearhead this?
+1 I see so many people texting and driving (I'm a big walker). What should I do? Take a picture of them and their license plate? How would I send it to the police?
You can text DC police at 50411, just not sure if they'll follow up on it.
https://mpdc.dc.gov/service/text-police-50411
Please try, though.
Taking pictures of license plates while you are driving is just as dangerous. The best thing you can do is pay attention to the road - which clearly, you are not doing- and drive defensive. Yes, something needs to be done. But you are a distracted driver as well at this point.
Anonymous wrote:I say it depends on how you define "drive".
If you're moving, then I take issue with that. That's a problem. That's compromising safety.
If you're sitting in traffic, crawling and stopping over and over... that's not driving. That's moving a few feet every minute.
My commute is 3 miles. But traffic is horrendous. It can sometimes take 45'minutes to go THREE miles. I only drive it during bad weather or when I'm going someplace right after work, the est of the time I bike if I'm in a hurry, or I walk.
But I refuse to accept that me texting or doing anything else on my phone is a danger to anyone when I'm sitting in traffic having not moved for four minutes.
These stupid zero tolerance policies are just as dumb as the ones they have for kids in school, where a 14 year old girl gets suspended for "drug possession" because she has Midol.
It's stupid.