Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We reached crisis towards the end of K and ended up pulling DS out of school at the beginning of May when he started hurting himself and threatening to kill himself. It took DS about 6 weeks to stabilize.
What the school is doing right now with multiple classrooms a day absolutely has to stop. That's doing nothing but making the problem worse. They need to do an FBA (which may or may not be ultimately useful) and start the process for an IEP. In our county, there is a short term therapeutic setting for kids in crisis but your county may not have something like that. I wouldn't discard the idea of pulling DS out of school for a month, though. Allowing him to stabilize is completely different than supporting his anxiety. First graders don't act like this when they're not in crisis.
Then the school needs to come up with a placement where your DC is able to access the curriculum. That might be an ED placement. ED was something I was really scared of for DS but retrospectively, the placement you want is the one that allows your DC to enjoy going to school, regardless of what that placement is called.
Regarding medication, we've been through several and DS is now on a mood stabilizer. Like PP's DC, this basically gets DS to a place where he's able to access the CBT techniques that he knows cognitively. DS is 10yo now and has been diagnosed with ASD, ADHD, and anxiety but K/1st were absolutely the hardest years which we got a handle on things.
Good luck.
OP here. I will respond to other PP questions when I have more time. What is an
ED placement?
You can't do a temporary placement b/c he doesn't have an IEP yet.
Try medication in addition to getting an IEP in place.
Temporary placements are possible before the IEP is finalized. From Wrightlaw:
http://www.wrightslaw.com/info/iep.law.appendixa.htm
14. For a child with a disability receiving special education for the first time, when must an IEP be developed--before or after the child begins to receive special education and related services?
Section 300.342(b)(1) requires that an IEP be ``in effect before special education and related services are provided to an eligible child * * *’’ (Italics added.)
The appropriate placement for a particular child with a disability cannot be determined until after decisions have been made about the child’s needs and the services that the public agency will provide to meet those needs. These decisions must be made at the IEP meeting, and it would not be permissible first to place the child and then develop the IEP. Therefore, the IEP must be developed before placement. (Further, the child’s placement must be based, among other factors, on the child’s IEP.)
This requirement does not preclude temporarily placing an eligible child with a disability in a program as part of the evaluation process--before the IEP is finalized--to assist a public agency in determining the appropriate placement for the child. However, it is essential that the temporary placement not become the final placement before the IEP is finalized. In order to ensure that this does not happen, the State might consider requiring LEAs to take the following actions:
a. Develop an interim IEP for the child that sets out the specific conditions and timelines for the trial placement. (See paragraph c, following.)
b. Ensure that the parents agree to the interim placement before it is carried out, and that they are involved throughout the [FR Page 12476] process of developing, reviewing, and revising the child’s IEP.
c. Set a specific timeline (e.g., 30 days) for completing the evaluation, finalizing the IEP, and determining the appropriate placement for the child.
d. Conduct an IEP meeting at the end of the trial period in order to finalize the child’s IEP.