Anonymous wrote:You said Oil massages are your preference, what does your wife like? Do you know? Fwiw, it’s not always physical. what works best for me is when my husband packs lunch and unloads the dishwasher on the nights he’s home
Anonymous wrote:Only barely related, but someone on the Internet suggested that women withhold sex until men join them in protesting the Supreme Court nominee who thinks that birth control is abortion. Those threats hold no fear for me. My wife has already decided to withhold sex quite independently of politics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What has changed for you that you don't want sex? I ask this sincerely and without accusation. I have small children and my libido has remained steady (and vigorous). To me that would be like deciding that music or great food is no longer appealing.
For most, it's energy and hormones. You can say, with some justification, that new Dads aren't as busy as new Moms. But, they're still pretty damn busy. I don't know a lot of new dads who are sleeping 8 hours and spending a lot of their awake time just hanging out, not doing anything. And the new dads still want sex. So, it's not just about being busier.
Also, I should add, that great food would absolutely lose its appeal if you were never hungry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What has changed for you that you don't want sex? I ask this sincerely and without accusation. I have small children and my libido has remained steady (and vigorous). To me that would be like deciding that music or great food is no longer appealing.
For most, it's energy and hormones. You can say, with some justification, that new Dads aren't as busy as new Moms. But, they're still pretty damn busy. I don't know a lot of new dads who are sleeping 8 hours and spending a lot of their awake time just hanging out, not doing anything. And the new dads still want sex. So, it's not just about being busier.
Anonymous wrote:
What has changed for you that you don't want sex? I ask this sincerely and without accusation. I have small children and my libido has remained steady (and vigorous). To me that would be like deciding that music or great food is no longer appealing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why women can’t make a small effort a few times a week for the good of the family. I don’t get it. It seems like all it takes to make my DH happy (and most other men out there) is to have sex 2-3 times a week. We have two small kids (5 and almost 3 and I am pregnant with a third). Sex is the last thing on my mind 99% of the time, but I do it for him. I even usually enjoy it once we get started.
I think there are two basic categories of women for whom this is problematic:
1) Those who usually don't enjoy it, even after they get started; and
2) Those who feel like they should be in the mood prior to having sex, otherwise it's a violation.
Those in category 2 would probably do well to read something like "Come As You Are" and learn about responsive desire; learn that sex where desire comes after the process is underway can still be good sex and good for the marriage. On the other hand, those in category 1 shouldn't be expected to just lay back and take it.
Men should also learn about responsive desire so that they don't create a new problem by getting pissy about having to initiate almost all of the time.
Women in either category 1 or 2 ought not be overly plussed about monogamy.
Yeah, but they will be. Because when he's not having sex, it's no biggie - just go masturbate. Sex is only about friction and orgasms. But when he's having sex with someone else, sex creates an emotional bond that is threatening to the marriage.
Married woman here. No, sex is not about friction and orgasms. It's about connection and intimacy. God forbid your husband wants to be loved and validated and rock your world. Yeesh. This crap I read about laying back and taking it so DH will do the dishes is madening. I'm a very physical person (work out a lot, love sex, etc) and feel really bad for the husbands of you ladies who don't seem to get it or want to get it.
Well you are very lucky. I don’t know any woman married for several years with small children that still wants to have sex all the time. For most of us things have changed. I am the PP who everybody is responding to. I have sex with my DH 3 times a week while pregnant wh my third, but I do it for him. There have been times where I initiated it because I wanted it, but it’s always when my parents are taking care of the kids and we are in a different place. DH and I have a great relationship and we used to have sex all the time. He had never had as much sex as he had with me when we first met... now it’s just not the same for me. I wish I wS more like you!
What has changed for you that you don't want sex? I ask this sincerely and without accusation. I have small children and my libido has remained steady (and vigorous). To me that would be like deciding that music or great food is no longer appealing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why women can’t make a small effort a few times a week for the good of the family. I don’t get it. It seems like all it takes to make my DH happy (and most other men out there) is to have sex 2-3 times a week. We have two small kids (5 and almost 3 and I am pregnant with a third). Sex is the last thing on my mind 99% of the time, but I do it for him. I even usually enjoy it once we get started.
I think there are two basic categories of women for whom this is problematic:
1) Those who usually don't enjoy it, even after they get started; and
2) Those who feel like they should be in the mood prior to having sex, otherwise it's a violation.
Those in category 2 would probably do well to read something like "Come As You Are" and learn about responsive desire; learn that sex where desire comes after the process is underway can still be good sex and good for the marriage. On the other hand, those in category 1 shouldn't be expected to just lay back and take it.
Men should also learn about responsive desire so that they don't create a new problem by getting pissy about having to initiate almost all of the time.
Women in either category 1 or 2 ought not be overly plussed about monogamy.
Yeah, but they will be. Because when he's not having sex, it's no biggie - just go masturbate. Sex is only about friction and orgasms. But when he's having sex with someone else, sex creates an emotional bond that is threatening to the marriage.
Married woman here. No, sex is not about friction and orgasms. It's about connection and intimacy. God forbid your husband wants to be loved and validated and rock your world. Yeesh. This crap I read about laying back and taking it so DH will do the dishes is madening. I'm a very physical person (work out a lot, love sex, etc) and feel really bad for the husbands of you ladies who don't seem to get it or want to get it.
Well you are very lucky. I don’t know any woman married for several years with small children that still wants to have sex all the time. For most of us things have changed. I am the PP who everybody is responding to. I have sex with my DH 3 times a week while pregnant wh my third, but I do it for him. There have been times where I initiated it because I wanted it, but it’s always when my parents are taking care of the kids and we are in a different place. DH and I have a great relationship and we used to have sex all the time. He had never had as much sex as he had with me when we first met... now it’s just not the same for me. I wish I wS more like you!
What has changed for you that you don't want sex? I ask this sincerely and without accusation. I have small children and my libido has remained steady (and vigorous). To me that would be like deciding that music or great food is no longer appealing.
Anonymous wrote:It's a bit tragic but not uncommon, I don't think, to have spouses who generally try to do right by each other, who are basically competent adults, and who try to carry a fair share of the load when it comes to running the family but who, nevertheless, find themselves in a situation with a libido mismatch. It's not particularly fair to make a woman feel like she has to have sex that she doesn't want to have, and it's not particularly fair to expect a man to be nearly sexless for the rest of his life. An open marriage won't work for most folks. They still love each other & divorce is problematic for a variety of reasons. Sometimes there simply are no good options, and it doesn't have to be anyone's fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why women can’t make a small effort a few times a week for the good of the family. I don’t get it. It seems like all it takes to make my DH happy (and most other men out there) is to have sex 2-3 times a week. We have two small kids (5 and almost 3 and I am pregnant with a third). Sex is the last thing on my mind 99% of the time, but I do it for him. I even usually enjoy it once we get started.
I think there are two basic categories of women for whom this is problematic:
1) Those who usually don't enjoy it, even after they get started; and
2) Those who feel like they should be in the mood prior to having sex, otherwise it's a violation.
Those in category 2 would probably do well to read something like "Come As You Are" and learn about responsive desire; learn that sex where desire comes after the process is underway can still be good sex and good for the marriage. On the other hand, those in category 1 shouldn't be expected to just lay back and take it.
Men should also learn about responsive desire so that they don't create a new problem by getting pissy about having to initiate almost all of the time.
Women in either category 1 or 2 ought not be overly plussed about monogamy.
Yeah, but they will be. Because when he's not having sex, it's no biggie - just go masturbate. Sex is only about friction and orgasms. But when he's having sex with someone else, sex creates an emotional bond that is threatening to the marriage.
Married woman here. No, sex is not about friction and orgasms. It's about connection and intimacy. God forbid your husband wants to be loved and validated and rock your world. Yeesh. This crap I read about laying back and taking it so DH will do the dishes is madening. I'm a very physical person (work out a lot, love sex, etc) and feel really bad for the husbands of you ladies who don't seem to get it or want to get it.
Well you are very lucky. I don’t know any woman married for several years with small children that still wants to have sex all the time. For most of us things have changed. I am the PP who everybody is responding to. I have sex with my DH 3 times a week while pregnant wh my third, but I do it for him. There have been times where I initiated it because I wanted it, but it’s always when my parents are taking care of the kids and we are in a different place. DH and I have a great relationship and we used to have sex all the time. He had never had as much sex as he had with me when we first met... now it’s just not the same for me. I wish I wS more like you!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why women can’t make a small effort a few times a week for the good of the family. I don’t get it. It seems like all it takes to make my DH happy (and most other men out there) is to have sex 2-3 times a week. We have two small kids (5 and almost 3 and I am pregnant with a third). Sex is the last thing on my mind 99% of the time, but I do it for him. I even usually enjoy it once we get started.
I think there are two basic categories of women for whom this is problematic:
1) Those who usually don't enjoy it, even after they get started; and
2) Those who feel like they should be in the mood prior to having sex, otherwise it's a violation.
Those in category 2 would probably do well to read something like "Come As You Are" and learn about responsive desire; learn that sex where desire comes after the process is underway can still be good sex and good for the marriage. On the other hand, those in category 1 shouldn't be expected to just lay back and take it.
Men should also learn about responsive desire so that they don't create a new problem by getting pissy about having to initiate almost all of the time.
Women in either category 1 or 2 ought not be overly plussed about monogamy.
Yeah, but they will be. Because when he's not having sex, it's no biggie - just go masturbate. Sex is only about friction and orgasms. But when he's having sex with someone else, sex creates an emotional bond that is threatening to the marriage.
Married woman here. No, sex is not about friction and orgasms. It's about connection and intimacy. God forbid your husband wants to be loved and validated and rock your world. Yeesh. This crap I read about laying back and taking it so DH will do the dishes is madening. I'm a very physical person (work out a lot, love sex, etc) and feel really bad for the husbands of you ladies who don't seem to get it or want to get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why women can’t make a small effort a few times a week for the good of the family. I don’t get it. It seems like all it takes to make my DH happy (and most other men out there) is to have sex 2-3 times a week. We have two small kids (5 and almost 3 and I am pregnant with a third). Sex is the last thing on my mind 99% of the time, but I do it for him. I even usually enjoy it once we get started.
I think there are two basic categories of women for whom this is problematic:
1) Those who usually don't enjoy it, even after they get started; and
2) Those who feel like they should be in the mood prior to having sex, otherwise it's a violation.
Those in category 2 would probably do well to read something like "Come As You Are" and learn about responsive desire; learn that sex where desire comes after the process is underway can still be good sex and good for the marriage. On the other hand, those in category 1 shouldn't be expected to just lay back and take it.
Men should also learn about responsive desire so that they don't create a new problem by getting pissy about having to initiate almost all of the time.
Women in either category 1 or 2 ought not be overly plussed about monogamy.
Yeah, but they will be. Because when he's not having sex, it's no biggie - just go masturbate. Sex is only about friction and orgasms. But when he's having sex with someone else, sex creates an emotional bond that is threatening to the marriage.