Anonymous wrote:My work study positions were always on campus. I worked in the dining hall and as catering staff (easiest jobs to get), and as tech support (wasn't able to start doing this until my second semester), and as a tutor (wasn't able to start doing this until my second year).
The tech support and tutoring jobs were helpful on future resumes. Dining hall and catering staff not so much.
Anonymous wrote:First gen meaning their parents came here as immigrants? I must live in bizarro world but almost every "first gen" I know is top of the class. I've never associated immigration with poor academics? Quite the opposite. Maybe that's just being a product of Northern Va. (Koreans, Chinese, Indian)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even at $10 an hour, it's not easy to earn that full $3,500 unless the kid works 20 hours a week. That's a major chunk of time, especially for a first-generation kid. And if it's a strenuous job where they have to be on their feet they're going to be physically fatigued for study and class time, which could snowball to screwing up their grades.
Why the heck is 20 hours worth more to a first generation kid? What a strange comment.
When I hear first gen I assume bottom half of the entering class. Kids in the top of the class can juggle everything. First gen kids are likely to get overwhelmed and start missing assignments ditching class and then dropping out. I’ve seen it hundreds of times.
Anonymous wrote:I know kids need skin in the game but first-gen kids overall have atrocious grades and I believe sub 10% graduation rates. Paying them to go to a study hall and meet with tutors would be far more effective than a job requirement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even at $10 an hour, it's not easy to earn that full $3,500 unless the kid works 20 hours a week. That's a major chunk of time, especially for a first-generation kid. And if it's a strenuous job where they have to be on their feet they're going to be physically fatigued for study and class time, which could snowball to screwing up their grades.
Why the heck is 20 hours worth more to a first generation kid? What a strange comment.
Anonymous wrote:Even at $10 an hour, it's not easy to earn that full $3,500 unless the kid works 20 hours a week. That's a major chunk of time, especially for a first-generation kid. And if it's a strenuous job where they have to be on their feet they're going to be physically fatigued for study and class time, which could snowball to screwing up their grades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC is a freshman. First generation. No change in grades or behavior. The previous letters do all have * disclaimer language that things can change this is estimate . . .
Haven’t called yet. We have no leverage and I feel like they’re going to be like that post above. “No . . . again, no . . .”
So you've known about this for at least two weeks and haven't bothered to make a single phone calls to understand what happened?
Anonymous wrote:DC is a freshman. First generation. No change in grades or behavior. The previous letters do all have * disclaimer language that things can change this is estimate . . .
Haven’t called yet. We have no leverage and I feel like they’re going to be like that post above. “No . . . again, no . . .”
Anonymous wrote:DC has been at college for two weeks and financial aid award updated right around move in. Very generous aid overall, but now instead of an essentially free $3,500 DC now has to work part-time for $3,500. We were attracted to the school because of the aid and no requirement to work the first year. I want to complain to financial aid office but I feel like we have no leverage (school already began) and whoever I get on the phone will think I'm acting entitled (due to already very generous aid) or that my teen's spoiled and doesn't want to work. I sincerely don't mind DC working other years but DC is first to go away for college and we would prefer focus on clubs and grades. Any advice?