Well probably. They have publicly said they want children and she is 37 right? Clock's ticking. They have time but not scads of it. Why wouldn't they get right to it?

I vote no to pregnancy. Harry wants to get up in dem guts early and often at this stage. Pregnancy would only interfere with that.

Anonymous wrote:Why all this hate for Kate? It's not like there are no SAHMs with three kids and rich husbands on here.

Yes!
Plus this sites weird obsession with Meghan and how much Harry touches her. Really?
One poster speculates on their sex life. It’s not normal.

My chest got full the day after we conceived. Both pregnancies.

He's glowing, and beaming with pride --she looks like she wants to sit down and put her feet up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does that mean she’s going to stop working too, like Kate? That would be ridiculous.

Meghan wouldn’t dream of it I’m thinking. A) She knows hard work is required of her, and b) her prior record of global work speaks for itself.

DP Well, if they choose to have children I hope they take time to enjoy them! There is nothing wrong with what Kate Middleton is doing. Taking care of her family is important and valuable.

Anonymous wrote:Gosh, he's really into her, isn't he? It's sweet to see .

They have been married only four months! I would say that is normal for the majority of people in the world.

Anonymous wrote:Gosh, he's really into her, isn't he? It's sweet to see .

I know! Happy for them both.

Why all this hate for Kate? It's not like there are no SAHMs with three kids and rich husbands on here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on, on that same page, she looks noticeably more buxom up top, but not so in shots lower down. Not even a different angle can amplify that much. The top photo is clearly doctored; the edge of her body and dress look artificial.

Top photo:

Lower down photo:

LOL no one is doctoring the images. The dress has ruffles and if you notice - she’s walking outside. Outside has wind. End of story.

Same PP you responded to. No, ruffles don't explain it. Top one clearly has more accentuation.

Alright - here's that exact same image from GettyImages.com. Getty is a photography-site of licensed photographs as they are from the papparazzi. They never doctor or photoshop their images. The mags who buy them do. Yet...the image is still the same.



The dress is Jason Wu and bespoke so there's nothing to compare it to. https://www.elle.com/uk/fashion/celebrity-style/a23003482/meghan-markle-prince-harry-music-gala-evening/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does that mean she’s going to stop working too, like Kate? That would be ridiculous.

Meghan wouldn’t dream of it I’m thinking. A) She knows hard work is required of her, and b) her prior record of global work speaks for itself.

Meghan's been a working member of the Royal family starting half a year before her wedding. She's not slowing down and I think she + Harry are on the exact same page. He went out looking for a woman who will kill it at being a successful, global power couple and Royal team.

"The fact that I fell in love with Meghan so incredibly quickly was sort of confirmation to me that all the stars were aligned, everything was just perfect. It was this beautiful woman just sort of literally tripped and fell into my life, I fell into her life. The fact that she — I know the fact that she will be unbelievably good at the job part of it as well is obviously a huge relief to me because she will be able to deal with everything else that comes with it. We’re a fantastic team. We know we are. And we hope to, over time, try and have as much impact for the things that we care about as much as possible." - Prince Harry

Anonymous wrote:Does that mean she’s going to stop working too, like Kate? That would be ridiculous.

Meghan wouldn’t dream of it I’m thinking. A) She knows hard work is required of her, and b) her prior record of global work speaks for itself.

Does that mean she’s going to stop working too, like Kate? That would be ridiculous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on, on that same page, she looks noticeably more buxom up top, but not so in shots lower down. Not even a different angle can amplify that much. The top photo is clearly doctored; the edge of her body and dress look artificial.

Top photo:

Lower down photo:

LOL no one is doctoring the images. The dress has ruffles and if you notice - she’s walking outside. Outside has wind. End of story.

Same PP you responded to. No, ruffles don't explain it. Top one clearly has more accentuation.

Anonymous wrote:Come on, on that same page, she looks noticeably more buxom up top, but not so in shots lower down. Not even a different angle can amplify that much. The top photo is clearly doctored; the edge of her body and dress look artificial.

Top photo:

Lower down photo:

LOL no one is doctoring the images. The dress has ruffles and if you notice - she’s walking outside. Outside has wind. End of story.