Anonymous wrote:Not every moment but in general yes, that's the deal.
Anonymous wrote:Does the wife owe her husband sex even if she’s not in the mood for it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once entitlement enters the conversation, there’s a major problem already.
It goes beyond consent.
If my partner does not enthusiastically share his or her body with me, there is a problem. But there is also a problem if I prize my own sexual gratification above my partner’s ownership of his or her body and enthusiasm to share it with me.
My grandmother taught me to never eat a meal cooked with resentment. I’ve applied the same to sex. I offered duty sex in my first marriage. When I divorced, I decided I would never do that again. My second marriage is much happier. In part because sex is not a currency or commodity.
So, you found someone with a similar drive. Good
It was never a drive issue. I became repulsed by my first H for a variety of reasons. It’s one thing to have no drive and turn down your spouse. It’s another thing to yearn for pleasure and then have your flesh creep at someone’s touch. I even tried getting drunk to get through duty sex. Toward the end, I think he got off on seeing how revolted, sad, and frustrated I was. My not wanting to refuse him sex have him a terrible power over me.
Glad that you were both able to move on.
Anonymous wrote:Not every moment but in general yes, that's the deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once entitlement enters the conversation, there’s a major problem already.
It goes beyond consent.
If my partner does not enthusiastically share his or her body with me, there is a problem. But there is also a problem if I prize my own sexual gratification above my partner’s ownership of his or her body and enthusiasm to share it with me.
My grandmother taught me to never eat a meal cooked with resentment. I’ve applied the same to sex. I offered duty sex in my first marriage. When I divorced, I decided I would never do that again. My second marriage is much happier. In part because sex is not a currency or commodity.
So, you found someone with a similar drive. Good
It was never a drive issue. I became repulsed by my first H for a variety of reasons. It’s one thing to have no drive and turn down your spouse. It’s another thing to yearn for pleasure and then have your flesh creep at someone’s touch. I even tried getting drunk to get through duty sex. Toward the end, I think he got off on seeing how revolted, sad, and frustrated I was. My not wanting to refuse him sex have him a terrible power over me.
Glad that you were both able to move on.
Anonymous wrote:No. The only thing you're entitled to is deciding no sex is a deal breaker, and you may leave. The idea that a spouse is entitled to sex tracks along the same thinking that you cannot rape your spouse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once entitlement enters the conversation, there’s a major problem already.
It goes beyond consent.
If my partner does not enthusiastically share his or her body with me, there is a problem. But there is also a problem if I prize my own sexual gratification above my partner’s ownership of his or her body and enthusiasm to share it with me.
My grandmother taught me to never eat a meal cooked with resentment. I’ve applied the same to sex. I offered duty sex in my first marriage. When I divorced, I decided I would never do that again. My second marriage is much happier. In part because sex is not a currency or commodity.
So, you found someone with a similar drive. Good
It was never a drive issue. I became repulsed by my first H for a variety of reasons. It’s one thing to have no drive and turn down your spouse. It’s another thing to yearn for pleasure and then have your flesh creep at someone’s touch. I even tried getting drunk to get through duty sex. Toward the end, I think he got off on seeing how revolted, sad, and frustrated I was. My not wanting to refuse him sex have him a terrible power over me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once entitlement enters the conversation, there’s a major problem already.
It goes beyond consent.
If my partner does not enthusiastically share his or her body with me, there is a problem. But there is also a problem if I prize my own sexual gratification above my partner’s ownership of his or her body and enthusiasm to share it with me.
My grandmother taught me to never eat a meal cooked with resentment. I’ve applied the same to sex. I offered duty sex in my first marriage. When I divorced, I decided I would never do that again. My second marriage is much happier. In part because sex is not a currency or commodity.
So, you found someone with a similar drive. Good
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the wife owe her husband sex even if she’s not in the mood for it?
Does the husband owe her mongamy even if he’s not in the mood for it?
PP that is a different question. When you marry you are supposed to "forsake all others" so my advice would be don't get married if you plan on cheating.
To the op:
No, one is not entitled to sex just because you want it. Marry a robot if you want a servant and not a partner OR be a better partner so she wants it.
My advice to you would be don’t get married if you plan on rejecting sex AND expect him to continue forsaking all others. These 2 are incompatible.