Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is heading the ball essential? I can see incidental head contact with the ball as ok, but purposely heading it could be 'outlawed.' Besides it could make for more 'acting' opportunities!
+1 How would the game suffer if intentional heading were banned?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop playing sports, safest place is in a bubble. Lets look at all the female players that are > 50 years old and study them. If there aren't any former players that show evidence, then play on.
Amen! 52 and still out there, heading balls.![]()
Are you a woman?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop playing sports, safest place is in a bubble. Lets look at all the female players that are > 50 years old and study them. If there aren't any former players that show evidence, then play on.
Amen! 52 and still out there, heading balls.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Stop playing sports, safest place is in a bubble. Lets look at all the female players that are > 50 years old and study them. If there aren't any former players that show evidence, then play on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Concussion headband.
Heck, make 'em all wear motorcycle helmets. Safety first!
Anonymous wrote:Why is heading the ball essential? I can see incidental head contact with the ball as ok, but purposely heading it could be 'outlawed.' Besides it could make for more 'acting' opportunities!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Concussion headband.
Heck, make 'em all wear motorcycle helmets. Safety first!
Hasn't helped the NFL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Concussion headband.
Heck, make 'em all wear motorcycle helmets. Safety first!
Anonymous wrote:Concussion headband.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work on a Neuroscience ICU. And several of us have kids who play soccer. Nothing else you said was worth addressing.
Some doctors smoke. What's your point?
That your comment about 10 neurologists is anecdotal. Some people won't vaccinate their kids either but i don't listen to those idiots either.
There are multiple posters here, I’m the one who posted the smoking comment but not the ten neuroscientists thing. But for the record, your anecdotal evidence is no more of less valid than that poster’s.
That's my point. The OP listed those 10 neurologists as if it were evidence. It's not, and no more valid than neurologists who disagree.
It's ALL anecdotal and meaningless.