Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Took too long. No confined space should ever have nuts in this day and age.
100% There are thousands of other snacks to choose from.
Also, due to long duration of confined space, animals (except true service animals) should be banned from flights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Took too long. No confined space should ever have nuts in this day and age.
100% There are thousands of other snacks to choose from.
Also, due to long duration of confined space, animals (except true service animals) should be banned from flights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Took too long. No confined space should ever have nuts in this day and age.
No one ever died from being exposed to peanuts in an airplane cabin. NO ONE.
And no one ever died from being exposed to peanuts at school or work or at a restaurant or a bar or anywhere else.
People who are highly sensitive to peanut ether in the air (is that a thing?) need to pretty much just avoid all public places. Avoid life.
But the rest of us who love and enjoy peanuts should not have to prance around on eggshells to accommodate the very few morons who swear they'll die if they get even a glimpse or whiff of a peanut. Get real.
Anonymous wrote:
Took too long. No confined space should ever have nuts in this day and age.
Anonymous wrote:
Took too long. No confined space should ever have nuts in this day and age.
Anonymous wrote:Back when I had a dog I used to fly with on a semi regular basis, I was told by the airlines that a passenger with allergies could be told if anyone has purchased a pet pass and could request no additional passes be sold for their row and adjacent rows. Is this not still the case? It was on Delta.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'm not a huge fan of animals on planes but I think the comparison is flawed. SW isn't banning nuts, so people (like pp) who want to bring nuts still can. But by not giving them away for free, I would guess they cut the number of people eating peanuts by, say, 60-70%. This means significantly lower risk that my peanut allergy toddler will somehow find a surface I haven't wiped down that is covered in peanut dust. There is still a risk that someone by is will eat peanuts or tree nuts- just as there is a risk we will sit next to an animal. The new policy is more similar to saying "we know people have asthma and will stop giving a puppy to everyone on board".
But on the other hand, there are lots of steps you can take to reduce your toddler’s exposure to peanut dust, such as wiping down services, whereas there is nothing an asthmatic person can do to prevent breathing an allergen that’s in the air.
Anonymous wrote:My 7 year old son has a severe allergy to peanuts. We carry an epipen (epinephrine injection) with us every time we leave the house as he could potentially die from allergic shock if he is exposed to peanuts. We don’t know whether he can breathe peanut dust or touch peanuts without going into shock and obviously aren’t going to test that. He’s had medical tests and all they can tell us is his allergy to peanuts is off the charts.
The Southwest news is good news as now we can fly Southwest but as prior posters have noted our choice was to either fly another airline or not fly at all. We didn’t complain about not being able to fly Southwest as there are certainly many people who have limited choices for any number of reasons and this was just ours.
My guess is that Southwest looked at the growing number of young children with peanut allergies (no one knows why but the incidence of food allergies generally and peanut allergies which are typically the most deadly) have been rising for awhile and just made a simple business decision of how many customers are they losing from peanut allergies versus how many would they lose if they eliminated peanuts as do many airlines have done awhile ago.
Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'm not a huge fan of animals on planes but I think the comparison is flawed. SW isn't banning nuts, so people (like pp) who want to bring nuts still can. But by not giving them away for free, I would guess they cut the number of people eating peanuts by, say, 60-70%. This means significantly lower risk that my peanut allergy toddler will somehow find a surface I haven't wiped down that is covered in peanut dust. There is still a risk that someone by is will eat peanuts or tree nuts- just as there is a risk we will sit next to an animal. The new policy is more similar to saying "we know people have asthma and will stop giving a puppy to everyone on board".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't die from a dog allergy
You can. For me and many others, allergic reactions to animals leads to asthma attacks.