Anonymous wrote:NP. Am i the only one that sort of feels like they can understand where the boss is coming from? If work ends at 6 but an employee leaves every day for a week at 4:30, that’s 7.5 hours of time, which is basically a workday. Apart from the burned half hour, whats the objection to using 8 hours of PTO?
Not trying to be inflammatory, just curious. Maybe I don’t get the whole exempt non-exempt thing or maybe I don’t have the same sort of job as you all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work for a massive multinational corp and several years ago, they went through a huge reclassification process moving people from exempt to non-exempt/hourly because they were found to be misclassifying people across the board. This is not at all uncommon, misclassifying people as exempt when they don't meet the standards for exempt is probably one of the most common violations out there for labor law. However, as you've stated OP, pushing the issue is a very risky move.
What I would do, if I were the employee, is look for a new job as hard as I can and in the meantime, be a clock watcher as much as the boss is. You want me to never leave a second before 6? Fine but I'm also never leaving a second after 6. Oh there's more work to be done in the evening? Suck my butt, I'm out.
My boss is like this and this is literally what I do.
Yep!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work for a massive multinational corp and several years ago, they went through a huge reclassification process moving people from exempt to non-exempt/hourly because they were found to be misclassifying people across the board. This is not at all uncommon, misclassifying people as exempt when they don't meet the standards for exempt is probably one of the most common violations out there for labor law. However, as you've stated OP, pushing the issue is a very risky move.
What I would do, if I were the employee, is look for a new job as hard as I can and in the meantime, be a clock watcher as much as the boss is. You want me to never leave a second before 6? Fine but I'm also never leaving a second after 6. Oh there's more work to be done in the evening? Suck my butt, I'm out.
My boss is like this and this is literally what I do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As far as I understand they can make the policies that they want regarding exempt staff (my company makes us take PTO in 4 hour increments and it's so annoying). The bigger issue is your boss sounds kind of like a d*ck and I would look for another job between the boss and the dismally small PTO you get.
You mean you need to take a half a day PTO at a time right? This is super standard....
I’ve never experienced this. Seems weird and counterproductive to me. I only need to take an hour, but you are going to force me to take 4? How does that help anyone, including the employer?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As far as I understand they can make the policies that they want regarding exempt staff (my company makes us take PTO in 4 hour increments and it's so annoying). The bigger issue is your boss sounds kind of like a d*ck and I would look for another job between the boss and the dismally small PTO you get.
You mean you need to take a half a day PTO at a time right? This is super standard....
NP. I didn’t realize this was standard. That makes me feel better —although it does mean that I’m away longer than I need to be for an hour medical appointment.
Anonymous wrote:I work for a massive multinational corp and several years ago, they went through a huge reclassification process moving people from exempt to non-exempt/hourly because they were found to be misclassifying people across the board. This is not at all uncommon, misclassifying people as exempt when they don't meet the standards for exempt is probably one of the most common violations out there for labor law. However, as you've stated OP, pushing the issue is a very risky move.
What I would do, if I were the employee, is look for a new job as hard as I can and in the meantime, be a clock watcher as much as the boss is. You want me to never leave a second before 6? Fine but I'm also never leaving a second after 6. Oh there's more work to be done in the evening? Suck my butt, I'm out.
Anonymous wrote:Find another job asap. The boss sounds like a nightmare. Or he really just wants to push this person out. If she is a woman and treated differently from other employees without kids or who are male, she might want to see about a lawsuit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As far as I understand they can make the policies that they want regarding exempt staff (my company makes us take PTO in 4 hour increments and it's so annoying). The bigger issue is your boss sounds kind of like a d*ck and I would look for another job between the boss and the dismally small PTO you get.
You mean you need to take a half a day PTO at a time right? This is super standard....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So which is it, OP, exempt or non-exempt? Different rules.
I think the employer says exempt, but I believe the employee is misclassified. Trying to find original offer letter.
Doesn't matter if the original offer letter does state exempt, the classification could still be wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So which is it, OP, exempt or non-exempt? Different rules.
I think the employer says exempt, but I believe the employee is misclassified. Trying to find original offer letter.
there are not different rules for her question, which is whether the employer can require the employer to be at the work at certain times.Anonymous wrote:So which is it, OP, exempt or non-exempt? Different rules.
Anonymous wrote:So which is it, OP, exempt or non-exempt? Different rules.