Anonymous wrote:If you have that level of income, why don't you each get an apartment and leave the kids in the home. You have a regular custody schedule, except instead of passing the kids back and forth you hand off the front door keys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sounds like you are approaching this as a business decision. It's not.
Exactly ! Marriage should not be a business decision. This would remove the $ from the decision. Though I’m sure the legal industrial complex wouldn’t like that.
Anonymous wrote:If you have that level of income, why don't you each get an apartment and leave the kids in the home. You have a regular custody schedule, except instead of passing the kids back and forth you hand off the front door keys.
Anonymous wrote:Your kids will be happier if they can see their parents happy separately.
You're totally in the wrong by wanting to keep living with their father as roomates.
Anonymous wrote:Are all women who get alimony greedy idiots?
Anonymous wrote:Uproot the kids. They will be relieved.
Anonymous wrote:Is this kind of arrangement even possible? I thought couples had to be physically separated (not living under the same roof) for a minimum of 12 months before divorce can proceed? Barring serious issues like domestic violence, incarceration, etc. How do you get around the 12-month separation period?